Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Jul;36(7):1029-1037. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13219. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Evaluate the bleaching efficacy (BE) and tooth sensitivity (TS) of in-office bleaching using different application tips.
Forty-eight participants were selected (split-mouth), one to receive bleaching with an attached brush tip and one with a conventional tip. The procedure was performed with Whiteness Automixx Plus 35%. The BE was evaluated at the beginning, weekly, one and 12 months post-bleaching with a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (ΔE*, ΔE, and WI) and with Vita classical A1-D4 and Vita Bleachedguide shade guides units (ΔSGU). Absolute risk and intensity of TS were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale. The equivalence of BE was analyzed using the two one-sided t-tests for paired samples. The absolute risk of TS was evaluated using the McNemar test, and the TS intensity was measured with the paired t test (α = 0.05).
The equivalence of BE was observed for both groups in all color evaluations (p > 0.05). A lower absolute risk and intensity of TS were observed for the attached brush tip when compared with the conventional tip (p < 0.003 and p < 0.0001).
Using an attached brush tip showed the same BE as a conventional tip. However, for the attached brush tip, there was a reduction in TS.
The applicator-attached brush tip is recommended for in-office dental bleaching, because of the possible reduction in risk and intensity of TS.
评估使用不同涂抹头的诊室漂白的漂白效果(BE)和牙齿敏感(TS)。
选择 48 名参与者(分侧),分别接受带有附加毛刷头和常规涂抹头的漂白。使用 Whiteness Automixx Plus 35%进行操作。在漂白开始时、每周、漂白后 1 个月和 12 个月,使用 Vita Easyshade 分光光度计(ΔE*、ΔE 和 WI)以及 Vita 经典 A1-D4 和 Vita 漂白比色指南比色板(ΔSGU)评估 BE。使用视觉模拟量表记录绝对 TS 风险和强度。使用配对样本的双侧 t 检验分析 BE 的等效性。使用 McNemar 检验评估 TS 的绝对风险,使用配对 t 检验测量 TS 强度(α=0.05)。
在所有颜色评估中,两组的 BE 等效性均得到观察(p>0.05)。与常规涂抹头相比,附加毛刷头的绝对 TS 风险和强度较低(p<0.003 和 p<0.0001)。
使用附加毛刷头的 BE 与常规涂抹头相同。然而,对于附加毛刷头,TS 风险和强度降低。
由于可能降低 TS 的风险和强度,建议在诊室牙齿漂白中使用带涂抹头的附加毛刷头。