Suppr超能文献

诊室美白凝胶pH值对联合美白技术中牙齿敏感的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Impact of the in-office bleaching gels pH on tooth sensitivity in combined bleaching techniques: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Verde Thiago Costa, de Melo Ferreira Gloria Maria Linhares Bandeira, Favoreto Michael Willian, de Souza Carneiro Taynara, Muniz Rosyara Silva Corrêa, Reis Alessandra, Cardenas Andres Felipe Millan, Loguercio Alessandro Dourado, de Siqueira Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 21;29(5):256. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06330-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This randomized, parallel, single-blind clinical trial evaluated tooth sensitivity (TS), efficacy, gingival irritation (GI), aesthetic self-perception, and psychosocial impact of combined bleaching using in-office bleaching agents with different pHs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

160 participants were randomized into two groups (n = 80) with 35% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching gels: Whiteness HP Maxx (acidic, unstable pH) and Whiteness HP Automixx Plus (neutral, stable pH). In-office bleaching was performed in one session: HP Maxx (3 applications of 15 min) and HP Automixx Plus (1 application of 50 min). Both groups then received at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide for 4 h daily for two weeks. TS and GI were assessed using Visual Analogue Scales. Color change was measured with a spectrophotometer and color guides. Aesthetic self-perception and psychosocial impact were evaluated using three scales: Orofacial Aesthetics Scale, Oral Health Impact Profile, and Psychosocial Impact Questionnaire of Dental Aesthetics.

RESULTS

The risk and intensity of TS significantly favored the neutral and stable pH gel for both in-office (p < 0.001) and combined treatments (p < 0.004). Both groups achieved significant whitening (p > 0.37). No difference in GI risk or intensity was found (p > 0.11). All aesthetic and psychosocial scales showed significant improvement post-treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Using a gel with neutral and stable pH during in-office bleaching reduces the risk and intensity of TS without compromising whitening efficacy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combining at-home and in-office bleaching with a neutral, stable gel reduces TS risk and intensity while ensuring optimal whitening results and patient comfort.

摘要

目的

本随机、平行、单盲临床试验评估了使用不同pH值的诊室漂白剂联合漂白对牙齿敏感(TS)、疗效、牙龈刺激(GI)、美学自我认知以及心理社会影响。

材料与方法

160名参与者被随机分为两组(n = 80),使用35%过氧化氢诊室漂白凝胶:Whiteness HP Maxx(酸性,不稳定pH值)和Whiteness HP Automixx Plus(中性,稳定pH值)。诊室漂白在一次就诊中进行:HP Maxx(15分钟应用3次)和HP Automixx Plus(50分钟应用1次)。然后两组均接受为期两周的每天4小时的10%过氧化脲家庭漂白。使用视觉模拟量表评估TS和GI。用分光光度计和色标测量颜色变化。使用三种量表评估美学自我认知和心理社会影响:口腔面部美学量表、口腔健康影响概况和牙科美学心理社会影响问卷。

结果

对于诊室漂白(p < 0.001)和联合治疗(p < 0.004),TS的风险和强度均显著有利于中性和稳定pH值的凝胶。两组均实现了显著美白(p > 0.37)。未发现GI风险或强度有差异(p > 0.11)。所有美学和心理社会量表在治疗后均显示出显著改善(p < 0.05)。

结论

在诊室漂白期间使用具有中性和稳定pH值的凝胶可降低TS的风险和强度,同时不影响美白效果。

临床意义

将家庭漂白和诊室漂白与中性、稳定的凝胶相结合可降低TS风险和强度,同时确保最佳美白效果和患者舒适度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验