• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估临床与转化研究机构中的管理工作。

Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization.

作者信息

Philibert Ingrid, Fletcher Amanda, Poppert Cordts Katrina M, Rizzo Matthew

机构信息

Great Plains IDeA CTR, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 13;8(1):e42. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.25. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.25
PMID:38476243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10928697/
Abstract

Institutional Development Awards for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) networks, funded by NIH/NIGMS, aim to advance CTR infrastructure to address historically unmet state and regional health needs. Success depends on the response to actionable feedback to IDeA-CTR leadership from network partners and governance groups through annual surveys, interviews, and governance body recommendations. The Great Plains IDeA-CTR applied internal formative meta-evaluation to evaluate dispositions of 172 governance recommendations from 2017 to 2021. Results provided insights to improve the classification and quality of recommendations, credibility of evaluation processes, responsiveness to recommendations, and communications and governance in a complex CTR network comprising multiple coalitions.

摘要

由美国国立卫生研究院/国立综合医学科学研究所资助的临床与转化研究机构发展奖(IDeA-CTR)网络旨在推进临床与转化研究基础设施建设,以满足历来未得到满足的州和地区健康需求。成功与否取决于通过年度调查、访谈以及治理机构建议,网络合作伙伴和治理团体对IDeA-CTR领导层可采取行动的反馈的回应。大平原IDeA-CTR应用内部形成性元评估来评估2017年至2021年期间172条治理建议的处理情况。结果为改善建议的分类和质量、评估过程的可信度、对建议的响应能力以及在一个由多个联盟组成的复杂临床与转化研究网络中的沟通和治理提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization.评估临床与转化研究机构中的管理工作。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 13;8(1):e42. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.25. eCollection 2024.
2
Participatory needs assessment and action planning for a clinical and translational research network.临床与转化研究网络的参与式需求评估与行动计划
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 21;5(1):e69. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.568.
3
Evidence-based practice strategies for faculty professional development in clinical translational research at Institutional Development Award (IDeA) state institutions in the Mountain West.美国西部山区获得机构发展奖(IDeA)的州立机构中,临床转化研究领域教师专业发展的循证实践策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 May 20;6(1):e83. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.407. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluating systemic changes to support clinical and translational health research.评估支持临床和转化健康研究的系统变化。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Oct;94:102145. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102145. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Building a Governance Strategy for CER: The Patient Outcomes Research to Advance Learning (PORTAL) Network Experience.构建比较效果研究的治理策略:推进学习的患者结局研究(PORTAL)网络经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 28;4(2):1216. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1216. eCollection 2016.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Improving clinical and translational research training: a qualitative evaluation of the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2-mentored research scholars program.改善临床与转化研究培训:对亚特兰大临床与转化科学研究所KL2指导的研究学者项目的定性评估
J Investig Med. 2017 Jan;65(1):23-31. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000143. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
Advance-CTR: Statewide Infrastructure to Improve Health in Rhode Island through Clinical and Translational Research.Advance-CTR:通过临床和转化研究改善罗得岛州健康状况的全州基础设施。
R I Med J (2013). 2021 Apr 1;104(3):41-45.
9
Leadership in informal stormwater governance networks.非正式雨水管理网络中的领导力。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0222434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222434. eCollection 2019.
10
Lessons Learned in Evaluating the Infrastructure of a Centre for Translational Research (CTR).评估转化研究中心(CTR)基础设施的经验教训
Eval J Australas. 2020 Mar 1;20(1):6-22. doi: 10.1177/1035719x20909910. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation Utility Metrics (EUMs) in Reflective Practice.反思性实践中的评估效用指标(EUMs)
Can J Program Eval. 2022 Jun;37(1):142-154. doi: 10.3138/cjpe.72386. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Lessons Learned in Evaluating the Infrastructure of a Centre for Translational Research (CTR).评估转化研究中心(CTR)基础设施的经验教训
Eval J Australas. 2020 Mar 1;20(1):6-22. doi: 10.1177/1035719x20909910. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
What attributes guide best practice for effective feedback? A scoping review.哪些属性指导有效反馈的最佳实践?范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 May;24(2):383-401. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9854-x. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting.实施策略:规范与报告建议。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 1;8:139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.
5
Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs).临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)评估指南。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):303-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12036. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
6
Measuring community coalition effectiveness using the ICE instrument.使用ICE工具衡量社区联盟的有效性。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;23(1):74-87. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2006.230111.x.
7
A conceptual model for understanding effective coalitions involved in health promotion programming.一个用于理解参与健康促进规划的有效联盟的概念模型。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;23(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2006.230110.x.