• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)评估指南。

Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs).

机构信息

Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):303-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12036. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1111/cts.12036
PMID:23919366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3931516/
Abstract

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a part of the National Institutes of Health, currently funds the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs), a national consortium of 61 medical research institutions in 30 states and the District of Columbia. The program seeks to transform the way biomedical research is conducted, speed the translation of laboratory discoveries into treatments for patients, engage communities in clinical research efforts, and train a new generation of clinical and translational researchers. An endeavor as ambitious and complex as the CTSA program requires high-quality evaluations in order to show that the program is well implemented, efficiently managed, and demonstrably effective. In this paper, the Evaluation Key Function Committee of the CTSA Consortium presents an overall framework for evaluating the CTSA program and offers policies to guide the evaluation work. The guidelines set forth are designed to serve as a tool for education within the CTSA community by illuminating key issues and practices that should be considered during evaluation planning, implementation, and utilization. Additionally, these guidelines can provide a basis for ongoing discussions about how the principles articulated in this paper can most effectively be translated into operational reality.

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院下属的国家转化医学科学中心(NCATS)目前为临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)提供资金支持,这是一个由 30 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 61 个医学研究机构组成的全国性联盟。该计划旨在改变生物医学研究的进行方式,加快实验室发现转化为患者治疗方法,使社区参与临床研究工作,并培养新一代临床和转化研究人员。像 CTSA 这样雄心勃勃和复杂的计划需要高质量的评估,以表明该计划得到了很好的实施、高效管理并具有明显的效果。在本文中,CTSA 联盟的评估关键职能委员会提出了一个评估 CTSA 计划的总体框架,并提供了指导评估工作的政策。制定的准则旨在通过阐明在评估规划、实施和利用过程中应考虑的关键问题和实践,为 CTSA 社区提供一个教育工具。此外,这些准则还可以为正在进行的讨论提供基础,探讨如何将本文阐述的原则最有效地转化为实际操作。

相似文献

1
Evaluation guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs).临床与转化科学奖(CTSAs)评估指南。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):303-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12036. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
2
Emergency Medicine Resources Within the Clinical Translational Science Institutes: A Cross-sectional Study.临床转化科学研究所内的急诊医学资源:一项横断面研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):740-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12926. Epub 2016 May 14.
3
Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research.评估临床研究效率的常用指标。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):432-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278713499586. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
4
Heterogeneity at work: implications of the 2012 Clinical Translational Science Award evaluators survey.工作中的异质性:2012 年临床转化科学奖评估者调查的启示。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):447-63. doi: 10.1177/0163278713510378.
5
Evaluation and the NIH clinical and translational science awards: a "top ten" list.评价与 NIH 临床与转化科学奖:十大要点
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Dec;36(4):411-31. doi: 10.1177/0163278713507061.
6
CTSA-IP: a solution to identifying and aggregating intellectual property across the NIH Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium of biomedical research institutes.CTSA-IP:一种用于确定和聚合美国国立卫生研究院临床转化科学奖(CTSA)联盟内生物医学研究所知识产权的解决方案。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):328-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00308.x.
7
The role of the clinical and translational science awards program in improving the quality and efficiency of clinical research.临床和转化科学奖项目在提高临床研究质量和效率中的作用。
Chest. 2011 Sep;140(3):764-767. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0710.
8
Reengineering the national clinical and translational research enterprise: the strategic plan of the National Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium.国家临床与转化研究企业的重塑:国家临床与转化科学奖联盟的战略计划。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):463-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccc877.
9
Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers.将实践为基础的研究网络与临床与转化科学奖联系起来:学术健康中心进行社区参与的新机会。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):476-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd2ed3.
10
Evaluating various areas of process improvement in an effort to improve clinical research: discussions from the 2012 Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Clinical Research Management workshop.评估各个领域的流程改进,以改善临床研究:2012 年临床转化科学奖(CTSA)临床研究管理研讨会的讨论。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):317-20. doi: 10.1111/cts.12051. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches and tools to measure individual-level research experience, activities, and outcomes: A narrative review.衡量个体层面研究经历、活动和成果的方法与工具:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 11;9(1):e161. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10076. eCollection 2025.
2
The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.研究者投入工具的开发、效度和信度。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 11;9(1):e160. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.673. eCollection 2025.
3
Modernizing CTSA hub evaluation: an integrated system for performance monitoring and translational science impact assessment.优化临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)中心评估:一个用于绩效监测和转化科学影响评估的综合系统
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Mar 31;10:1534394. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1534394. eCollection 2025.
4
Moving from to : A collaborative continuous quality improvement process for advancing Clinical and Translational Science.从 迈向 :推进临床与转化科学的协作式持续质量改进过程。 (你提供的原文中两个冒号前内容缺失,我按照完整格式翻译了,你可根据实际内容修改完善)
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May 30;8(1):e103. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.555. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization.评估临床与转化研究机构中的管理工作。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 13;8(1):e42. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.25. eCollection 2024.
6
Prioritising and incentivising productivity within indicator-based approaches to Research Impact Assessment: a commentary.基于指标的研究影响评估方法中优先考虑和激励生产力:评论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01082-7.
7
Guidelines for Evaluating Clinical Research Training using Competency Assessments.使用能力评估来评估临床研究培训的指南。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 22;8:202. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000202.2. eCollection 2019.
8
A National Study on Training Innovation in US Medical Education.美国医学教育培训创新的全国性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 3;15(10):e46433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46433. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Evaluation of a clinical and translational research initiative: Developing and implementing a collaborative evaluation process in CAIRIBU.一项临床与转化研究计划的评估:在CAIRIBU中制定并实施协作评估流程
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e68. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.12. eCollection 2023.
10
Evaluating the impact of a CTSA program from 2008 to 2021 through bibliometrics, social network analysis, and altmetrics.通过文献计量学、社会网络分析和替代计量学评估2008年至2021年CTSA项目的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 11;7(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.530. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating translational research: a process marker model.评估转化研究:过程标志物模型。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x.
2
Evaluation metrics for biostatistical and epidemiological collaborations.生物统计学和流行病学合作的评价指标。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 15;30(23):2767-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.4184. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
3
The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: the "how" of high-quality care.转变美国医疗保健的“3T”路线图:高质量医疗的“方式”
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2319-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2319.
4
The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention?基因组医学中的翻译研究连续统一体:我们如何加速将人类基因组发现合理整合到医疗保健和疾病预防中?
Genet Med. 2007 Oct;9(10):665-74. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815699d0.
5
Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.基于实践的研究——美国国立卫生研究院路线图上的“蓝色高速公路”。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.403.
6
Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.国家临床研究事业面临的核心挑战。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.