W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America.
College of Business, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0222434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222434. eCollection 2019.
Recent transitions in the governance of urban stormwater, specifically developments that leverage the environmental and social benefits of green infrastructure (GI) including infiltration and neighborhood stabilization, often require capacities beyond those of any single municipal- or regional-scale organization. In many cities, transitions toward green stormwater infrastructure have been shepherded by networks of individuals spanning a diversity of organizations from governments to NGOs. These networks are often informal, that is, not established by legal mandate, governing authority, or formal agreement, and are often striking for their lack of formal hierarchy or formal leadership. Previous scholarship has revealed the importance of leadership in the development and efficacy of these multiorganizational, cross-sector environmental governance networks, but research has yet to empirically investigate and characterize informal network leaders within the context of GI for stormwater mitigation. To address this gap, we designed and administered a social network analysis (SNA) survey to individuals in a regional network of GI stormwater management professionals in and around Cleveland, Ohio USA. We collected network data on individual relationships, including collaboration and trust, and tested the impact of these relationships on peer-recognition of leaders in the GI network. Our findings suggest that network size, frequency of collaboration, and individual position within the network-specifically, betweenness centrality and openness-defined and likely supported leaders in the stormwater governance network. Leaders in this non-hierarchical, multi-institution context were more likely to be women and brokerage roles within the network benefitted women, not men, which contrasts with previous findings from research on single-organization and corporate networks. The implications of this research suggest that informal environmental governance networks, such as the GI network investigated, differ substantially from the generally more hierarchical networks of organizations. This finding is useful for municipalities and regional authorities grappling with complex environmental challenges, including transitions in strategies to manage excess stormwater for the protection of municipal drinking water sources and urban freshwater ecosystems.
最近,城市雨水管理的治理发生了转变,特别是利用绿色基础设施(GI)的环境和社会效益的发展,包括渗透和邻里稳定,这通常需要超出任何单一市政或区域规模组织的能力。在许多城市,向绿色雨水基础设施的转变是由跨越政府到非政府组织等各种组织的个人网络推动的。这些网络通常是非正式的,也就是说,不是通过法律授权、治理权威或正式协议建立的,并且通常因其缺乏正式的层次结构或正式的领导而引人注目。以前的研究表明,领导力在这些多组织、跨部门的环境治理网络的发展和有效性方面至关重要,但研究尚未在 GI 缓解雨水方面对非正式网络领导者进行实证调查和描述。为了解决这一差距,我们设计并管理了一项社会网络分析(SNA)调查,调查对象是美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰及其周边地区的 GI 雨水管理专业人员的区域网络中的个人。我们收集了关于个人关系的网络数据,包括合作和信任,并测试了这些关系对 GI 网络中同行对领导者的认可的影响。我们的研究结果表明,网络规模、合作频率以及个人在网络中的特定位置——中心性和开放性——定义并可能支持雨水治理网络中的领导者。在这个非层次化、多机构的背景下,领导者更有可能是女性,并且网络中的经纪人角色对女性有利,而不是男性,这与之前关于单一组织和企业网络的研究结果形成对比。这项研究的意义在于,非正式的环境治理网络,如所调查的 GI 网络,与通常更为层次化的组织网络有很大的不同。这一发现对于那些正在应对复杂环境挑战的城市和地区当局来说是有用的,包括在保护城市饮用水源和城市淡水生态系统的战略方面的转变。