Chen Zhengquan, Tirosh Oren, Han Jia, Adams Roger, El-Ansary Doa, Pranata Adrian
Shanghai Yangpu District Mental Health Center, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Department of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 27;12:1351913. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1351913. eCollection 2024.
Voluntary lateral weight shifting is essential for gait initiation. However, kinematic changes during voluntary lateral weight shifting remain unknown in people with low back pain (LBP). This study aims to explore the differences in kinematics and muscle activation when performing a voluntary lateral weight shifting task between patients with LBP and asymptomatic controls without pain. Twenty-eight participants volunteered in this study (14 in both the LBP group and the control group). The Sway Discrimination Apparatus (SwayDA) was used to generate a postural sway control task, mimicking lateral weight shifting movements when initiating gait. Kinematic parameters, including range of motion (ROM) and standard deviation of ROM (Std-ROM) of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and lower limb joints, were recorded using a motion capture system during lateral weight shifting. The electroactivity of the trunk and lower limb muscles was measured through surface electromyography using root mean square (RMS). The significant level was 0.05. An independent -test was employed to compare kinematic parameters, and muscle activation between the LBP group and the control group. A paired-sample -test, adjusted with Bonferroni correction (significant level of 0.025), was utilized to examine differences between the ipsilateral weight shifting towards side (dominant side) and the contralateral side. The results of kinematic parameters showed significantly decreased ROM and std-ROM of the ipsilateral hip in the transverse plane (t = -2.059, = 0.050; t = -2.670, = 0.013), as well as decreased ROM of the ipsilateral knee in the coronal plane ( = -2.148, = 0.042), in the LBP group compared to the control group. For the asymptomatic controls, significantly larger ROM and ROM-std were observed in the hip and knee joints on the ipsilateral side in contrast to the contralateral side (3.287 ≤ ≤ 4.500, 0.001 ≤ ≤ 0.006), but no significant differences were found between the two sides in the LBP group. In addition, the LBP group showed significantly lower RMS of the biceps femoris than the control group (t = -2.186, = 0.044). Patients with LBP showed a conservative postural control pattern, characterized by reduced ROM of ipsilateral joints and diminished activation of the biceps femoris. These findings suggested the importance of voluntary postural control assessment and intervention to maximize recovery.
自主侧向体重转移对于步态启动至关重要。然而,下背痛(LBP)患者在自主侧向体重转移过程中的运动学变化仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨LBP患者与无症状对照组在执行自主侧向体重转移任务时运动学和肌肉激活的差异。28名参与者自愿参加本研究(LBP组和对照组各14名)。使用摇摆辨别装置(SwayDA)生成一个姿势摇摆控制任务,模拟步态启动时的侧向体重转移运动。在侧向体重转移过程中,使用运动捕捉系统记录运动学参数,包括腰椎、骨盆和下肢关节的活动范围(ROM)和ROM的标准差(Std-ROM)。通过表面肌电图使用均方根(RMS)测量躯干和下肢肌肉的电活动。显著性水平为0.05。采用独立样本t检验比较LBP组和对照组之间的运动学参数和肌肉激活情况。采用配对样本t检验,并经Bonferroni校正(显著性水平为0.025),以检查同侧体重向一侧(优势侧)转移与对侧之间的差异。运动学参数结果显示,与对照组相比,LBP组同侧髋关节在横断面的ROM和Std-ROM显著降低(t = -2.059,P = 0.050;t = -2.670,P = 0.013),同侧膝关节在冠状面的ROM也降低(t = -2.148,P = 0.042)。对于无症状对照组,与对侧相比,同侧髋关节和膝关节的ROM和ROM-Std显著更大(3.287≤t≤4.500,0.001≤P≤0.006),但LBP组两侧之间未发现显著差异。此外,LBP组股二头肌的RMS显著低于对照组(t = -2.186,P = 0.044)。LBP患者表现出一种保守的姿势控制模式,其特征是同侧关节ROM降低和股二头肌激活减弱。这些发现表明自主姿势控制评估和干预对于实现最大程度恢复的重要性。