• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health.特邀观点：为何系统评价、范围综述及证据到决策框架对于环境卫生领域透明、一致、公平且基于科学的决策至关重要。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Mar;132(3):31304. doi: 10.1289/EHP14346. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.证据决策框架：为环境健康干预措施的决策提供信息的综述与分析。
Environ Health. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00794-z.
3
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述？在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时，作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
4
Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making.推进暴露科学系统评价方法学，以支持环境健康决策。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;30(6):906-916. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0236-0. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.构建环境与职业健康决策框架的研究：一项系统综述与德尔菲研究
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109209. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
6
Protocol of a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about COVID-19 vaccines and associated adverse events from vaccination.针对 COVID-19 疫苗及相关接种不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析的范围审查方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0285442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285442. eCollection 2023.
7
Approaches for assessing decision-making capacity in older adults: a scoping review protocol.评估老年人决策能力的方法：系统评价研究方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Apr;18(4):832-840. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00068.
8
Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?环境健康评论：它们有多系统？
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106473. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
9
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
10
Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote.在EndNote中管理和编码系统评价与范围综述的参考文献
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):19-31. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Behavioral, Clinical, and Policy Interventions in Reducing Human Exposure to Bisphenols and Phthalates: A Scoping Review.行为、临床和政策干预措施对减少人类双酚 A 和邻苯二甲酸酯暴露的影响：范围综述。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Mar;132(3):36001. doi: 10.1289/EHP11760. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs.对食品中双酚A（BPA）存在所涉公共卫生风险的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 19;21(4):e06857. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Optimizing Chemicals Management in the United States and Canada through the Essential-Use Approach.通过必要用途方法优化美国和加拿大的化学品管理。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jan 31;57(4):1568-1575. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05932. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
4
Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions.进行透明、及时的证据评估，以促成有益于健康的保护行动。
Environ Health. 2022 Dec 5;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00926-z.
5
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Implementation: How the Amended Law Has Failed to Protect Vulnerable Populations from Toxic Chemicals in the United States.有毒物质控制法案（TSCA）实施情况：修正后的法律如何未能保护美国弱势群体免受有毒化学品的侵害。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Sep 6;56(17):11969-11982. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02079. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward.美国的农药和环境不公平：根本原因、当前的监管加强以及前进的道路。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13057-4.
7
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.超越新实体的行星边界安全运行空间。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;56(3):1510-1521. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.证据决策框架：为环境健康干预措施的决策提供信息的综述与分析。
Environ Health. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00794-z.
9
Finding essentiality feasible: common questions and misinterpretations concerning the "essential-use" concept.寻找必要性的可行性：关于“必要用途”概念的常见问题和误解。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2021 Aug 1;23(8):1079-1087. doi: 10.1039/d1em00180a. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
10
Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?环境健康评论：它们有多系统？
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106473. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health.

作者信息

Chartres Nicholas, Joglekar Rashmi

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Mar;132(3):31304. doi: 10.1289/EHP14346. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1289/EHP14346
PMID:38477608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936216/
Abstract
摘要