California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.
University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jan 31;57(4):1568-1575. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05932. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Chemicals have improved the functionality and convenience of industrial and consumer products, but sometimes at the expense of human or ecological health. Existing regulatory systems have proven to be inadequate for assessing and managing the tens of thousands of chemicals in commerce. A different approach is urgently needed to minimize ongoing production, use, and exposures to hazardous chemicals. The premise of the essential-use approach is that chemicals of concern should be used only in cases in which their function in specific products is necessary for health, safety, or the functioning of society and when feasible alternatives are unavailable. To optimize the essential-use approach for broader implementation in the United States and Canada, we recommend that governments and businesses (1) identify chemicals of concern for essentiality assessments based on a broad range of hazard traits, going beyond toxicity; (2) expedite decision-making by avoiding unnecessary assessments and strategically asking up to three questions to determine whether the use of the chemical in the product is essential; (3) apply the essential-use approach as early as possible in the process of developing and assessing chemicals; and (4) engage diverse experts in identifying chemical uses and functions, assessing alternatives, and making essentiality determinations and share such information broadly. If optimized and expanded into regulatory systems in the United States and Canada, other policymaking bodies, and businesses, the essential-use approach can improve chemicals management and shift the market toward safer chemistries that benefit human and ecological health.
化学品提高了工业和消费产品的功能和便利性,但有时却以牺牲人类或生态健康为代价。现有的监管体系已被证明不足以评估和管理商业领域中数以万计的化学品。迫切需要采取一种不同的方法,以尽量减少危险化学品的持续生产、使用和暴露。基本用途方法的前提是,只有在特定产品中,这些关注的化学品对健康、安全或社会运行具有必要功能,且可行替代品不可用时,才应将其用于生产。为了优化基本用途方法,以便更广泛地在美国和加拿大实施,我们建议政府和企业:(1) 根据广泛的危害特征,确定基本用途评估所涉及的关注化学品,而不仅仅是毒性;(2) 通过避免不必要的评估和战略性地提出三个问题,来加快决策制定,以确定产品中使用该化学品是否必要;(3) 在开发和评估化学品的过程中尽早应用基本用途方法;(4) 让不同的专家参与识别化学品用途和功能、评估替代品以及做出基本用途判断,并广泛分享此类信息。如果在美国和加拿大的监管系统以及其他决策机构和企业中得到优化和扩展,基本用途方法可以改进化学品管理,并促使市场向有利于人类和生态健康的更安全化学品转移。