East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Trust, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Jul;106(6):521-527. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0015. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has been adopted to identify patients requiring further investigations on the colorectal cancer (CRC) referral pathway. We aimed to investigate the effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs on the accuracy of FIT results.
This observational study categorised patients with suspected CRC symptoms, who completed both FIT and colonic investigations, into two groups (control and exposed) based on their use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. Two-by-two tables and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine accuracy.
A total of 928 patients were divided into a control (=683) and an exposed group (=245). A nonsignificant higher proportion of patients tested positive in the exposed group (24.1% vs 18.4%, =0.063). For detection of CRC, improved sensitivity of 87% vs 81.2%, specificity of 84.8% vs 79.9% and negative predictive value of 99.2% vs 98.3% was calculated in the control vs exposed groups, respectively. The positive predictive value was comparable between the two groups (21.4% vs 22% in the control and exposed groups, respectively). In ROC analysis, there was no difference between the groups (AUC 90% vs 87%, =0.56). The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs did not increase the risk of positive FIT results on multivariate logistic regression analysis.
FIT accuracy for CRC detection remained unaffected despite more patients testing positive in the exposed group. FIT should be considered a supplementary tool for triage. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs do not need to be discontinued before collection of FIT.
粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)已被用于确定需要进一步进行结直肠癌(CRC)转诊路径检查的患者。我们旨在研究抗血小板和抗凝药物对 FIT 结果准确性的影响。
本观察性研究根据抗血小板和抗凝药物的使用情况,将有疑似 CRC 症状且完成 FIT 和结肠检查的患者分为两组(对照组和暴露组)。使用 2×2 表和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定准确性。
共纳入 928 例患者,分为对照组(n=683)和暴露组(n=245)。暴露组中检测结果呈阳性的患者比例略高(24.1%比 18.4%,=0.063)。在检测 CRC 方面,对照组的敏感性为 87%,特异性为 84.8%,阴性预测值为 99.2%,均优于暴露组的 81.2%、79.9%和 98.3%。两组的阳性预测值相当(对照组和暴露组分别为 21.4%和 22%)。在 ROC 分析中,两组之间无差异(对照组 AUC 为 90%,暴露组为 87%,=0.56)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,抗血小板和抗凝药物的使用并未增加 FIT 阳性结果的风险。
尽管暴露组中更多的患者检测结果呈阳性,但 FIT 对 CRC 检测的准确性并未受到影响。FIT 应被视为一种辅助分诊工具。在采集 FIT 前,无需停用抗血小板和抗凝药物。