• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的医疗保健成本、资源利用和生产力损失。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):843-852. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
3
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
4
USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.美国预防服务工作组结直肠癌筛查指南:对多年间隔期检测的深入探讨
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e77-81.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;36(3):393-414. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
7
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组关于结直肠癌筛查的医师和患者建议。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):307-323. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians (Version 2).美国医师学院无症状一般风险成人结直肠癌筛查指南(2023 年版)
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Aug;176(8):1092-1100. doi: 10.7326/M23-0779. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
9
Acceptability of alternative technologies compared with faecal immunochemical test and/or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review.替代技术在结直肠癌筛查中与粪便免疫化学试验和/或结肠镜检查的可接受性比较:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2023 Mar;30(1):14-27. doi: 10.1177/09691413221109999. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological trends of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers from 1990 to 2021 and predictions for 2036: analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021.1990年至2021年早发性胃肠道癌症的流行病学趋势及2036年预测:来自2021年全球疾病负担研究的分析
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2555518. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2555518. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
2
The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between empowerment and benefit finding among Chinese colorectal cancer patients.复原力在中国结直肠癌患者赋能与获益发现关系中的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 24;15(1):31143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17249-x.
3
Global colorectal cancer screening programs and coverage rate estimation: an evidence synthesis.全球结直肠癌筛查项目与覆盖率估计:一项证据综合分析
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 22;23(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06887-4.
4
Role of non-coding RNA-regulated ferroptosis in colorectal cancer.非编码RNA调控的铁死亡在结直肠癌中的作用
Cell Death Discov. 2025 Jul 8;11(1):315. doi: 10.1038/s41420-025-02606-6.
5
Cracking the Code of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview With a Focus on Current and Emerging Screening Methods.破解结直肠癌筛查密码:聚焦当前及新兴筛查方法的概述
Cureus. 2025 May 24;17(5):e84724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84724. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Diagnostic Value of the Combined Detection of Microbiota, Multiple Inflammation-Related Indicators, Serum Lipid Indices, and Tumour Markers in Colorectal Polyps: A Case-Control Study.微生物群、多种炎症相关指标、血脂指标和肿瘤标志物联合检测在大肠息肉中的诊断价值:一项病例对照研究
Int J Med Sci. 2025 May 30;22(11):2757-2770. doi: 10.7150/ijms.108819. eCollection 2025.
7
Prediction of KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer using a CT-based radiomic model.基于CT的影像组学模型预测结直肠癌中的KRAS基因突变
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 12;12:1592497. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1592497. eCollection 2025.
8
Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy for Identifying Sessile Serrated Polyps and Adenomas During Routine Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.在常规结直肠癌筛查中使用Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查识别无蒂锯齿状息肉和腺瘤:一项回顾性队列研究
JGH Open. 2025 May 14;9(5):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70173. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Tongue coating microbiota-based machine learning for diagnosing digestive system tumours.基于舌苔微生物群的机器学习用于诊断消化系统肿瘤
J Oral Microbiol. 2025 Apr 5;17(1):2487645. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2487645. eCollection 2025.
10
Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in India: Real-World Scenario, Pitfalls, and Solutions.印度结直肠癌筛查:现实情况、陷阱与解决方案
South Asian J Cancer. 2025 Feb 12;13(4):229-235. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1802655. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining developments in multicancer early detection: highlights of new clinical data from recent conferences.探讨多癌种早期检测的新进展:近期会议中新型临床数据要点。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Dec;27(19 Suppl):S347-S355. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88801.
2
Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015.结肠镜胶囊内镜在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:随机对照试验CareForColon2015的中期分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1712-E1719. doi: 10.1055/a-1546-8727. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
4
Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review.迈向新型非侵入性结直肠癌筛查方法:全面综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;13(8):1820. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081820.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测与结肠镜检查或粪便免疫化学检测用于阿拉斯加原住民结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 May;96(5):1203-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.035. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland.采用粪便免疫化学检测进行面向性别的结直肠癌筛查试点:芬兰基于人群的登记研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e046667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046667.
7
The optimal cut-off value in fit-based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study.基于拟合的结直肠癌筛查的最佳截断值:一项观察性研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1872-1879. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3761. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.利用 CRC-AIM 微观模拟模型估计基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查比较效果的差异依从性影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431. eCollection 2020.
9
Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).参与结直肠癌筛查的竞争策略:一项随机卫生服务研究(PICCOLINO 研究)。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.049. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening With Repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test Versus Sigmoidoscopy: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial.重复粪便免疫化学试验与乙状结肠镜检查筛查结直肠癌:一项随机试验的基线结果。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1085-1096.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.037. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。

Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.

出版信息

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4
PMID:35316477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989803/
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) imposes significant morbidity and mortality, yet it is also largely preventable with evidence-based screening strategies. In May 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated guidance, recommending screening begin at age 45 for average-risk individuals to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the United States (US). The Task Force recommends screening with one of several screening strategies: high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test (HSgFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, computed tomographic (CT) colonography (virtual colonoscopy), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, or traditional colonoscopy. In addition to these recommended options, there are several emerging and novel CRC screening modalities that are not yet approved for first-line screening in average-risk individuals. These include blood-based screening or "liquid biopsy," colon capsule endoscopy, urinary metabolomics, and stool-based microbiome testing for the detection of colorectal polyps and/or CRC. In order to maximize CRC screening uptake in the US, patients and providers should engage in informed decision-making about the benefits and limitations of recommended screening options to determine the most appropriate screening test. Factors to consider include the invasiveness of the test, test performance, screening interval, accessibility, and cost. In addition, health systems should have a programmatic approach to CRC screening, which may include evidence-based strategies such as patient education, provider education, mailed screening outreach, and/or patient navigation, to maximize screening participation.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)带来了巨大的发病率和死亡率,但通过基于证据的筛查策略,它在很大程度上也是可以预防的。2021 年 5 月,美国预防服务工作组更新了指南,建议在 45 岁开始对一般风险人群进行筛查,以降低美国 CRC 的发病率和死亡率。工作组建议使用以下几种筛查策略之一进行筛查:高灵敏度愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(HSgFOBT)、粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)、多靶点粪便 DNA(mt-sDNA)试验、计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠成像(虚拟结肠镜检查)、柔性乙状结肠镜检查、带有 FIT 的柔性乙状结肠镜检查或传统结肠镜检查。除了这些推荐的选择外,还有几种新兴的、新颖的 CRC 筛查方法尚未被批准用于一般风险人群的一线筛查。这些方法包括基于血液的筛查或“液体活检”、结肠胶囊内镜、尿代谢组学以及基于粪便的微生物组检测,用于检测结直肠息肉和/或 CRC。为了在美国最大限度地提高 CRC 筛查率,患者和医生应该就推荐的筛查方法的益处和局限性进行知情决策,以确定最合适的筛查测试。需要考虑的因素包括测试的侵入性、测试性能、筛查间隔、可及性和成本。此外,卫生系统应该对 CRC 筛查采取计划方法,这可能包括基于证据的策略,如患者教育、医生教育、邮寄筛查推广和/或患者导航,以最大限度地提高筛查参与度。