Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。

Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.

出版信息

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) imposes significant morbidity and mortality, yet it is also largely preventable with evidence-based screening strategies. In May 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated guidance, recommending screening begin at age 45 for average-risk individuals to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the United States (US). The Task Force recommends screening with one of several screening strategies: high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test (HSgFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, computed tomographic (CT) colonography (virtual colonoscopy), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, or traditional colonoscopy. In addition to these recommended options, there are several emerging and novel CRC screening modalities that are not yet approved for first-line screening in average-risk individuals. These include blood-based screening or "liquid biopsy," colon capsule endoscopy, urinary metabolomics, and stool-based microbiome testing for the detection of colorectal polyps and/or CRC. In order to maximize CRC screening uptake in the US, patients and providers should engage in informed decision-making about the benefits and limitations of recommended screening options to determine the most appropriate screening test. Factors to consider include the invasiveness of the test, test performance, screening interval, accessibility, and cost. In addition, health systems should have a programmatic approach to CRC screening, which may include evidence-based strategies such as patient education, provider education, mailed screening outreach, and/or patient navigation, to maximize screening participation.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)带来了巨大的发病率和死亡率,但通过基于证据的筛查策略,它在很大程度上也是可以预防的。2021 年 5 月,美国预防服务工作组更新了指南,建议在 45 岁开始对一般风险人群进行筛查,以降低美国 CRC 的发病率和死亡率。工作组建议使用以下几种筛查策略之一进行筛查:高灵敏度愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(HSgFOBT)、粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)、多靶点粪便 DNA(mt-sDNA)试验、计算机断层扫描(CT)结肠成像(虚拟结肠镜检查)、柔性乙状结肠镜检查、带有 FIT 的柔性乙状结肠镜检查或传统结肠镜检查。除了这些推荐的选择外,还有几种新兴的、新颖的 CRC 筛查方法尚未被批准用于一般风险人群的一线筛查。这些方法包括基于血液的筛查或“液体活检”、结肠胶囊内镜、尿代谢组学以及基于粪便的微生物组检测,用于检测结直肠息肉和/或 CRC。为了在美国最大限度地提高 CRC 筛查率,患者和医生应该就推荐的筛查方法的益处和局限性进行知情决策,以确定最合适的筛查测试。需要考虑的因素包括测试的侵入性、测试性能、筛查间隔、可及性和成本。此外,卫生系统应该对 CRC 筛查采取计划方法,这可能包括基于证据的策略,如患者教育、医生教育、邮寄筛查推广和/或患者导航,以最大限度地提高筛查参与度。

相似文献

1
Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;36(3):393-414. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验