• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 3 期 FINCH 研究中,Filgotinib 对疼痛控制的影响。

Impact of filgotinib on pain control in the phase 3 FINCH studies.

机构信息

Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2024 Mar 12;10(1):e003839. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003839.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003839
PMID:38479751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10936501/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis of the FINCH 1-3 (NCT02889796, NCT02873936 and NCT02886728) studies assessed specific effects of filgotinib on pain control and their relationship with other aspects of efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Assessments included: residual pain responses of ≤10 and ≤20 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS); the proportion of patients who achieved VAS pain responses in addition to remission or low disease activity by Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria.

RESULTS

Across studies, filgotinib reduced pain from week 2, with responses sustained throughout the studies. In FINCH 1, at week 24, 35.8%, 25.0%, 24.6% and 11.6% of patients in the filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab and placebo arms (each plus methotrexate) achieved VAS pain ≤20 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission; 26.3%, 17.9%, 17.2% and 7.6% achieved VAS pain ≤10 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission. A similar pattern was seen for CDAI remission. Time during which VAS pain was ≤10 or ≤20 mm was longest with filgotinib 200 mg and comparable between adalimumab and filgotinib 100 mg. Similar findings were reported for filgotinib in FINCH 2 and 3.

CONCLUSION

In all RA populations studied, pain improvements occurred from week 2 and were sustained over time. In FINCH 1, filgotinib 100 mg provided similar pain amelioration to adalimumab, whereas filgotinib 200 mg resulted in greater pain improvement and higher proportion of patients with residual pain ≤10 or ≤20 mm and meeting DAS28-CRP remission criteria.

摘要

目的

本项 FINCH 1-3 研究(NCT02889796、NCT02873936 和 NCT02886728)的事后分析评估了 filgotinib 对疼痛控制的具体作用及其与类风湿关节炎(RA)患者其他疗效方面的关系。

方法

评估包括:100mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)上≤10 和≤20mm 的残余疼痛反应;符合 DAS28- C 反应蛋白(DAS28-CRP)或临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)缓解或低疾病活动标准的患者中,filgotinib 治疗组在 VAS 疼痛缓解的比例,此外还有缓解或低疾病活动的患者比例。

结果

在所有研究中,filgotinib 在第 2 周时降低了疼痛,并且在整个研究期间保持了这种缓解。在 FINCH 1 中,在第 24 周时,filgotinib 200mg、filgotinib 100mg、阿达木单抗和安慰剂组(均加用甲氨蝶呤)中,分别有 35.8%、25.0%、24.6%和 11.6%的患者在 DAS28-CRP 缓解的基础上实现了 VAS 疼痛≤20mm;26.3%、17.9%、17.2%和 7.6%的患者在 DAS28-CRP 缓解的基础上实现了 VAS 疼痛≤10mm。CDAI 缓解的情况也类似。VAS 疼痛≤10 或≤20mm 的时间在 filgotinib 200mg 组最长,与阿达木单抗相当,而在 filgotinib 100mg 组则相似。filgotinib 在 FINCH 2 和 3 中的研究结果也相似。

结论

在所有研究的 RA 患者中,疼痛改善从第 2 周开始,并随着时间的推移持续存在。在 FINCH 1 中,filgotinib 100mg 与阿达木单抗提供了相似的疼痛改善效果,而 filgotinib 200mg 则导致了更大的疼痛改善,且有更高比例的患者残余疼痛≤10 或≤20mm,符合 DAS28-CRP 缓解标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/f65be6916915/rmdopen-2023-003839f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/83fc692b3561/rmdopen-2023-003839f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/b0ce73d9fc19/rmdopen-2023-003839f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/27778f4a5247/rmdopen-2023-003839f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/916a80477e2d/rmdopen-2023-003839f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/f65be6916915/rmdopen-2023-003839f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/83fc692b3561/rmdopen-2023-003839f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/b0ce73d9fc19/rmdopen-2023-003839f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/27778f4a5247/rmdopen-2023-003839f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/916a80477e2d/rmdopen-2023-003839f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34c3/10936501/f65be6916915/rmdopen-2023-003839f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of filgotinib on pain control in the phase 3 FINCH studies.在 3 期 FINCH 研究中,Filgotinib 对疼痛控制的影响。
RMD Open. 2024 Mar 12;10(1):e003839. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003839.
2
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with moderately active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate.非戈替尼治疗中度活动性类风湿关节炎且对甲氨蝶呤反应不足患者的疗效和安全性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1661-1671. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae486.
3
Effect of Filgotinib vs Placebo on Clinical Response in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy: The FINCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.依帕司他治疗糖尿病周围神经病变有效性和安全性的系统评价和 Meta 分析
JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):315-325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9055.
4
The impact of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of Phase 3 studies.依尼妥单抗联合化疗治疗晚期或转移性胃腺癌或胃食管结合部腺癌患者的多中心、开放、随机对照Ⅱ期临床研究
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jan 3;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02677-7.
5
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognostic factors: post hoc analysis of FINCH 3.非甲氨蝶呤初治的伴有不良预后因素的类风湿关节炎患者使用非戈替尼的疗效和安全性:FINCH 3事后分析
RMD Open. 2021 Aug;7(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001621.
6
Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis.非戈替尼治疗类风湿关节炎安全性和有效性的地理分析
Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):35-51. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00494-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial.非戈替尼对比安慰剂或阿达木单抗治疗对甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者:一项 III 期随机临床试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):848-858. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219214. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib alone and in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: Subpopulation analyses of 24-week data of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 3).在既往有限或未接受过甲氨蝶呤治疗的日本活动性类风湿关节炎患者中,单独使用和联合使用非戈替尼的疗效和安全性:一项全球 3 期研究(FINCH 3)24 周数据的亚组分析。
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Feb 28;32(2):273-283. doi: 10.1093/mr/roab021.
9
Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial.在有活性类风湿关节炎且之前有限制或未使用过甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中,与甲氨蝶呤联合或作为单药治疗相比,Filgotinib 联合甲氨蝶呤或作为单药治疗:III 期随机对照 FINCH 3 试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):727-738. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219213. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to methotrexate: Subpopulation analyses of 24-week data of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 1).在对甲氨蝶呤应答不足的日本活动性类风湿关节炎患者中,联合使用非戈替尼和甲氨蝶呤的疗效和安全性:一项全球 3 期研究(FINCH 1)24 周数据的亚组分析。
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Feb 28;32(2):263-272. doi: 10.1093/mr/roab030.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-Life Use of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.非戈替尼在类风湿关节炎中的实际应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7185. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237185.
2
The Uncoupling of Disease Activity from Joint Structural Progression in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Filgotinib.使用非戈替尼治疗的类风湿关节炎患者疾病活动与关节结构进展的解偶联
Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Feb;12(1):53-66. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00725-7. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: week 156 interim results from a long-term extension study.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain in the joints and beyond; the challenge of rheumatoid arthritis.关节疼痛及其他问题:类风湿关节炎的挑战。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;5(6):e351-e360. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00094-2. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial.接受生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗反应不佳的类风湿关节炎患者中,upadacitinib 对比 abatacept 的患者报告结局:一项 3 期试验的 12 周和 24 周结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 24;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x.
3
在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项长期扩展研究的第 156 周中期结果。
RMD Open. 2024 Oct 24;10(4):e004476. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004476.
4
An interdisciplinary perspective on peripheral drivers of pain in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎外周驱动因素的跨学科视角。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;20(11):671-682. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01155-z. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
5
Glucocorticoid sparing effect of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis, a single-centre retrospective analysis.类风湿关节炎中与生物性改善病情抗风湿药相比,Janus激酶抑制剂的糖皮质激素节省效应:一项单中心回顾性分析
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1698-1704. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae455.
New indicator for discordance between patient-reported and traditional disease activity outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
新指标可反映早期类风湿关节炎患者报告的和传统疾病活动结局之间的不匹配。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Dec 23;62(1):108-115. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac213.
4
Achieving pain control in early rheumatoid arthritis with baricitinib monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate versus methotrexate monotherapy.巴瑞替尼单药治疗或与甲氨蝶呤联合治疗与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗相比,在早期类风湿性关节炎中实现疼痛控制。
RMD Open. 2022 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001994.
5
Does opioid-based pharmacotherapy have a place in rheumatoid arthritis therapy?基于阿片类药物的药物治疗在类风湿性关节炎治疗中是否占有一席之地?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;22(15):1945-1947. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1940136. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
The Therapeutic Landscape of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current State and Future Directions.类风湿关节炎的治疗前景:现状与未来方向
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:680043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.680043. eCollection 2021.
7
2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2021 年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jul;73(7):924-939. doi: 10.1002/acr.24596. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial.非戈替尼对比安慰剂或阿达木单抗治疗对甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者:一项 III 期随机临床试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):848-858. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219214. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial.在有活性类风湿关节炎且之前有限制或未使用过甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中,与甲氨蝶呤联合或作为单药治疗相比,Filgotinib 联合甲氨蝶呤或作为单药治疗:III 期随机对照 FINCH 3 试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):727-738. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219213. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
The Jak/STAT pathway: A focus on pain in rheumatoid arthritis.Jak/STAT 通路:类风湿关节炎中的疼痛焦点。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Feb;51(1):278-284. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Dec 18.