Saha Boris, Alam Sharique, Lyngdoh Daiasharailang, Mishra Surendra Kumar
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr Z.A Dental College, A.M.U, Aligarh, India.
Eur Oral Res. 2024 Jan 5;58(1):44-50. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241264315.
The study aimed to compare postoperative pain after root canal preparation using three different methods of working length determination.
60 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were randomly divided into three groups based on the method of working length (WL) determination. Group 1: digital radiograph (DRG), Group 2: electronic apex locator (EAL), Group 3: the simultaneous working length control (SLC) method using an endomotor with an integrated apex locator. The root canal treatments were completed in a single visit, and patients were asked to record their pain response using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
Group 1 (DRG) recorded the highest postoperative pain score, while the lowest was recorded by Group 3 (SLC). There was a statistically significant difference in the VAS pain scores between DRG and SLC (p<0.05) at 6-, 24- and 48-hour intervals.
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the SLC can be a helpful working length determination technique to reduce postoperative pain.
本研究旨在比较使用三种不同工作长度确定方法进行根管预备后的术后疼痛情况。
60例被诊断为有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者,根据工作长度(WL)确定方法随机分为三组。第1组:数字X线片(DRG);第2组:电子根尖定位仪(EAL);第3组:使用带有集成根尖定位仪的牙髓动力系统的同步工作长度控制(SLC)方法。根管治疗在一次就诊时完成,患者被要求在术后6、24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录其疼痛反应。
第1组(DRG)记录的术后疼痛评分最高,而第3组(SLC)记录的最低。在6、24和48小时间隔时,DRG和SLC之间的VAS疼痛评分存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。
在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,SLC可以作为一种有助于减少术后疼痛的工作长度确定技术。