Suppr超能文献

数字化X线摄影、电子根尖定位仪与根管治疗术后疼痛时同步工作长度测定的比较评估:一项随机临床试验

Comparative evaluation of digital radiography, electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length determination on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Saha Boris, Alam Sharique, Lyngdoh Daiasharailang, Mishra Surendra Kumar

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr Z.A Dental College, A.M.U, Aligarh, India.

出版信息

Eur Oral Res. 2024 Jan 5;58(1):44-50. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241264315.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare postoperative pain after root canal preparation using three different methods of working length determination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were randomly divided into three groups based on the method of working length (WL) determination. Group 1: digital radiograph (DRG), Group 2: electronic apex locator (EAL), Group 3: the simultaneous working length control (SLC) method using an endomotor with an integrated apex locator. The root canal treatments were completed in a single visit, and patients were asked to record their pain response using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Group 1 (DRG) recorded the highest postoperative pain score, while the lowest was recorded by Group 3 (SLC). There was a statistically significant difference in the VAS pain scores between DRG and SLC (p<0.05) at 6-, 24- and 48-hour intervals.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the SLC can be a helpful working length determination technique to reduce postoperative pain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用三种不同工作长度确定方法进行根管预备后的术后疼痛情况。

材料与方法

60例被诊断为有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者,根据工作长度(WL)确定方法随机分为三组。第1组:数字X线片(DRG);第2组:电子根尖定位仪(EAL);第3组:使用带有集成根尖定位仪的牙髓动力系统的同步工作长度控制(SLC)方法。根管治疗在一次就诊时完成,患者被要求在术后6、24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录其疼痛反应。

结果

第1组(DRG)记录的术后疼痛评分最高,而第3组(SLC)记录的最低。在6、24和48小时间隔时,DRG和SLC之间的VAS疼痛评分存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,SLC可以作为一种有助于减少术后疼痛的工作长度确定技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa2/10927710/0d0ac4b01890/eor-058-044-e001.jpg

相似文献

4
Comparison of Radiovisiography, an Apex Locator and an Integrated Endomotor-inbuilt Apex Locator in Primary Teeth Endometrics.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S18-S21. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2123.
5
Comparative Assessment of Working Length Determination: Apex Locators versus Endomotor with Built-in Apex Locator in Single-Rooted Permanent Teeth.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2892-S2894. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_487_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
9
Accuracy of the electronic apex locator, tactile, and radiographic methods in working length determination.
J Conserv Dent. 2023 May-Jun;26(3):311-315. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_45_23. Epub 2023 May 16.
10
Comparison of Tentative Radiographic Working Length with and without grid Versus Electronic Apex Locator.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):88-91. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_790_17.

本文引用的文献

2
Accuracy of electronic apical functions of a new integrated motor compared to the visual control of the working length-an ex vivo study.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03357-7. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
In Vivo Evaluation of 3 Electronic Apex Locators: Root ZX Mini, Apex ID, and Propex Pixi.
J Endod. 2020 Feb;46(2):158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.035. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination: An invitro study.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Summer;11(3):161-165. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.029. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
Effect of the Simultaneous Working Length Control during Root Canal Preparation on Postoperative Pain.
J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1422-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment.
Int Endod J. 2014 Mar;47(3):211-21. doi: 10.1111/iej.12137. Epub 2013 May 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验