Miyaguchi Takuma, Tazawa Masayuki, Kanaya Takafumi, Ibe Yoko, Arii Hironori, Yajima Kenji, Nakao Yumiko, Wada Naoki
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024 Jan 17;6(1):100322. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100322. eCollection 2024 Mar.
To make an initial assessment of the correlation between immersive virtual reality-based (ILBT) line bisection testing and paper-and-pencil-based line bisection (PLBT) testing in healthy subjects.
Diagnostic study.
Research laboratory.
Twenty healthy adults (51.5 [11.0] years old, 55% women; N=20).
Participants underwent an ILBT and a conventional PLBT in near space (NS) and more distant space (MDS). Correlations between the ILBT and PLBT, deviation rates in the NS and MDS, horizontal gaze distribution, and presence of virtual reality sickness (VRS) were evaluated.
Correlation between the deviation rates of the PLBT and ILBT.
There was no significant correlation between the ILBT and PLBT for evaluating the deviation rate of the line bisection test (LBT). There was no significant difference in the deviation rate of the LBTs between the NS and MDS, but there was a significant difference in the horizontal line-of-sight distribution. VRS was not observed as an adverse event.
In healthy adult subjects, our results suggested that there was no significant correlation between the deviation rates of the ILBT and PLBT. We also found that the ILBT is a useful and safe method for evaluating the horizontal line-of-sight distribution and percentage deviation of line segments from the center in the NS and MDS without inducing VRS.
对健康受试者中基于沉浸式虚拟现实的直线二等分测试（ILBT）与纸笔式直线二等分测试（PLBT）之间的相关性进行初步评估。
诊断性研究。
研究实验室。
20名健康成年人（年龄51.5 [11.0]岁，女性占55%；N = 20）。
参与者在近空间（NS）和更远空间（MDS）接受了ILBT和传统的PLBT。评估了ILBT与PLBT之间的相关性、NS和MDS中的偏差率、水平注视分布以及虚拟现实疾病（VRS）的存在情况。
PLBT和ILBT偏差率之间的相关性。
在评估直线二等分测试（LBT）的偏差率时，ILBT与PLBT之间无显著相关性。NS和MDS中LBT的偏差率无显著差异，但水平视线分布存在显著差异。未观察到VRS作为不良事件。
在健康成年受试者中，我们的结果表明ILBT和PLBT的偏差率之间无显著相关性。我们还发现，ILBT是一种有用且安全的方法，可用于评估NS和MDS中水平视线分布以及线段相对于中心的偏差百分比，且不会诱发VRS。
