Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Trier, 54286, Trier, Germany.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Jul;51(4):428-438. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01361-7. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
This study aimed to assess the impact of switching from face-to-face (f2f) psychotherapy to video therapy (VT) due to the COVID-19 pandemic on in-session processes, i.e., the therapeutic alliance, coping skills, and emotional involvement, as rated by both patients and therapists.
A total of N = 454 patients with mood or anxiety disorders were examined. The intervention group (IG) consisted of n = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who switched from f2f to VT, while the control group (CG) consisted of n = 227 patient-therapist dyads, who were treated f2f before the pandemic. To evaluate the effects of switching to VT on in-session processes, three longitudinal piecewise multilevel models, one per process variable, were fitted. Each process variable was regressed on the session number with a slope for the three sessions before switching to VT and a second slope for up to six VT sessions afterwards.
The therapeutic alliance significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups (IG and CG) and raters (patients and therapists) with no differences between IG and CG. On average, patients rated the therapeutic alliance better than therapists. Coping skills significantly increased after switching from f2f to VT across the two groups and raters, but the CG rated coping skills higher than the IG after the switch. Overall, therapists rated coping skills higher than patients. Emotional involvement did not significantly increase after switching to VT across the two groups and raters and there was no significant difference between patient and therapist ratings.
In conclusion, the switch to VT had no negative impact on the therapeutic alliance and emotional involvement. However, more coping skills were reported in the CG than in the IG after the switch to VT, which was mainly due to a stagnation in patient-rated coping skills in the IG.
本研究旨在评估由于 COVID-19 大流行,从面对面(f2f)心理治疗转为视频治疗(VT)对治疗联盟、应对技能和情绪投入等治疗过程的影响,这些都是由患者和治疗师共同评估的。
共有 454 名患有情绪或焦虑障碍的患者接受了检查。干预组(IG)包括 n = 227 名患者-治疗师对,他们从 f2f 转为 VT,而对照组(CG)包括 n = 227 名患者-治疗师对,他们在大流行前接受 f2f 治疗。为了评估转向 VT 对治疗过程的影响,我们拟合了三个纵向分段多层模型,每个模型针对一个过程变量。每个过程变量都与会话编号相关联,有一个从 f2f 切换到 VT 前三个会话的斜率,以及另一个后续六个 VT 会话的斜率。
在 IG 和 CG 两组以及患者和治疗师两个评估者中,从 f2f 转为 VT 后,治疗联盟显著增加,IG 和 CG 之间没有差异。平均而言,患者对治疗联盟的评价优于治疗师。从 f2f 转为 VT 后,IG 和 CG 两组以及两个评估者的应对技能都显著增加,但 CG 在转换后对应对技能的评价高于 IG。总体而言,治疗师对应对技能的评价高于患者。情绪投入在 IG 和 CG 两组以及两个评估者中,从 f2f 转为 VT 后没有显著增加,并且在患者和治疗师的评价之间没有显著差异。
总之,转向 VT 对治疗联盟和情绪投入没有负面影响。然而,在转向 VT 后,CG 比 IG 报告了更多的应对技能,这主要是由于 IG 中患者对应对技能的评价停滞不前。