Lang V O
Anaesthesist. 1979 Sep;28(9):419-27.
The clinical significance of I.M.V.-technique with or without C.P.A.P. are shown. The influence of different I.M.V.-technique on spontaneous respiration and lung ventilation is analyzed. Patient-synchronized techniques especially S.-I.M.V. or E.S.-I.M.V. prooved to be superior. Respiratory-physiological and technical recommendation for I.M.V.-arrangements are given and common devices of the literature analyzed. By these examples individual as well as commercially available devices can be critically evaluated for practical use and safety.
展示了有无持续气道正压通气（C.P.A.P.）的间歇指令通气（I.M.V.）技术的临床意义。分析了不同间歇指令通气技术对自主呼吸和肺通气的影响。患者同步技术，尤其是同步间歇指令通气（S.-I.M.V.）或增强同步间歇指令通气（E.S.-I.M.V.）被证明更具优势。给出了间歇指令通气设置的呼吸生理学和技术建议，并分析了文献中的常见设备。通过这些例子，可以对个体以及市售设备在实际使用和安全性方面进行批判性评估。
