Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2024 May 15;313:124115. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.124115. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
In this study, five earth-friendly spectrophotometric methods using multivariate techniques were developed to analyze levofloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem, which are utilized in critical care units as combination therapies. These techniques were used to determine the mentioned medications in laboratory-prepared mixtures, pharmaceutical products and spiked human plasma that had not been separated before handling. These methods were named classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), genetic algorithm partial least squares (GA-PLS), and artificial neural network (ANN). The methods used a five-level, three-factor experimental design to make different concentrations of the antibiotics mentioned (based on how much of them are found in the plasma of critical care patients and their linearity ranges). The approaches used for levofloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem were in the ranges of 3-15, 8-20, and 5-25 µg/mL, respectively. Several analytical tools were used to test the proposed methods' performance. These included the root mean square error of prediction, the root mean square error of cross-validation, percentage recoveries, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients. The outcome was highly satisfactory. The study found that the root mean square errors of prediction for levofloxacin were 0.090, 0.079, 0.065, 0.027, and 0.001 for the CLS, PCR, PLS, GA-PLS, and ANN models, respectively. The corresponding values for linezolid were 0.127, 0.122, 0.108, 0.05, and 0.114, respectively. For meropenem, the values were 0.230, 0.222, 0.179, 0.097, and 0.099 for the same models, respectively. These results indicate that the developed models were highly accurate and precise. This study compared the efficiency of artificial neural networks and classical chemometric models in enhancing spectral data selectivity for quickly identifying three antimicrobials. The results from these five models were subjected to statistical analysis and compared with each other and with the previously published ones. Finally, the whiteness of the methods was assessed by the recently published white analytical chemistry (WAC) RGB 12, and the greenness of the proposed methods was assessed using AGREE, GAPI, NEMI, Raynie and Driver, and eco-scale, which showed that the suggested approaches had the least negative environmental impact. Furthermore, to demonstrate solvent sustainability, a greenness index using a spider chart methodology was employed.
在这项研究中,开发了五种使用多元技术的环保分光光度法,用于分析左氧氟沙星、利奈唑胺和美罗培南,这些药物在重症监护病房被用作联合治疗。这些技术用于在未分离的情况下,在实验室制备的混合物、药物产品和未经处理的加标人血浆中测定上述药物。这些方法分别命名为经典最小二乘法(CLS)、主成分回归(PCR)、偏最小二乘法(PLS)、遗传算法偏最小二乘法(GA-PLS)和人工神经网络(ANN)。这些方法使用五水平、三因素实验设计,使抗生素的浓度不同(基于在重症监护患者血浆中的含量及其线性范围)。左氧氟沙星、利奈唑胺和美罗培南的检测范围分别为 3-15、8-20 和 5-25μg/mL。使用了几种分析工具来测试所提出方法的性能。这些工具包括预测均方根误差、交叉验证均方根误差、回收率百分比、标准偏差和相关系数。结果非常令人满意。研究发现,CLS、PCR、PLS、GA-PLS 和 ANN 模型预测左氧氟沙星的均方根误差分别为 0.090、0.079、0.065、0.027 和 0.001。相应的利奈唑胺值分别为 0.127、0.122、0.108、0.05 和 0.114。对于美罗培南,同一模型的相应值分别为 0.230、0.222、0.179、0.097 和 0.099。这些结果表明,所开发的模型具有高度的准确性和精密度。本研究比较了人工神经网络和经典化学计量模型在增强光谱数据选择性方面的效率,以快速识别三种抗生素。这五个模型的结果进行了统计分析,并相互比较,与以前发表的结果进行了比较。最后,根据最近发表的白色分析化学(WAC)RGB 12 评估了方法的白度,使用 AGREE、GAPI、NEMI、Raynie 和 Driver 以及生态规模评估了所建议方法的绿色度,结果表明所建议的方法对环境的负面影响最小。此外,为了证明溶剂的可持续性,采用蜘蛛图方法评估了绿色度指数。