Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.
Central Queensland Public Health Unit, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):e073555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073555.
We aimed to define the epidemiology of COVID-19 outbreaks in aged care facilities (ACFs) during the postvaccine period, including vaccine effectiveness (VE) for this high-risk group.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched through 1 September 2023.
Any original observational studies and trials reporting data on COVID-19 outbreaks among the partially/fully vaccinated residents from ACFs during or after the worldwide implementation of vaccine roll-out.
We estimated the attack rate, case fatality rate, mortality rate and VE during postvaccine period. Random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. Quality assessment on all included studies was performed using the Meta Quality Appraisal Tool.
38 articles were included from 12 countries reporting 79 outbreaks with 1708 confirmed cases of COVID-19 from 78 ACFs. The pooled attack rate was 28% (95% CI 20% to 37%) among the fully vaccinated residents. Two-thirds (62.5%) of the index cases were unvaccinated healthcare professionals (eg, physicians, nurses) and caregivers. Unvaccinated residents had a significantly higher rates (12%) (95% CI 7% to 19%) of mortality compared with the vaccinated residents (2%) (95% CI% 1 to 4%) and the post-COVID-19 vaccine estimates for case fatality rate (13% vs 23%) and hospitalisation rate (17% vs 37%) were substantially lower. VE in preventing disease among residents in ACFs was 73% (95% CI 49% to 86). Overall, the included studies were heterogeneous in nature, however, the risk of bias was low to moderate.
Our study reaffirmed the impact of vaccination as a key public health measure to minimise the burden of COVID-19 in ACFs. Facilities with higher crowding indexes should be prioritised for vaccination and should advocate for higher vaccination targets among staff and residents as a critical intervention strategy to minimise disease burden in this vulnerable population.
我们旨在定义疫苗接种后时期老年护理机构(ACF)中 COVID-19 爆发的流行病学情况,包括该高风险群体的疫苗有效性(VE)。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
通过 2023 年 9 月 1 日检索 Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库。
任何报告了在全球疫苗推出期间或之后,ACF 中部分/完全接种疫苗的居民 COVID-19 爆发数据的原始观察性研究和试验。
我们估计了疫苗接种后时期的发病率、病死率、死亡率和 VE。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用 Meta 质量评估工具对所有纳入研究进行质量评估。
来自 12 个国家的 38 篇文章报告了 79 起爆发事件,来自 78 个 ACF 的 1708 例 COVID-19 确诊病例。完全接种疫苗的居民发病率为 28%(95% CI 20%至 37%)。三分之二(62.5%)的指数病例为未接种疫苗的医护人员(如医生、护士)和护理人员。未接种疫苗的居民死亡率明显更高(12%)(95%CI 7%至 19%),而接种疫苗的居民死亡率为 2%(95%CI%1 至 4%),接种后 COVID-19 疫苗估计病死率(13%比 23%)和住院率(17%比 37%)明显较低。ACF 居民中预防疾病的 VE 为 73%(95% CI 49%至 86%)。总体而言,纳入研究在性质上存在异质性,但偏倚风险为低至中度。
我们的研究再次证实了疫苗接种作为减轻 ACF 中 COVID-19 负担的关键公共卫生措施的重要性。人群拥挤指数较高的设施应优先接种疫苗,并应倡导在工作人员和居民中实现更高的疫苗接种目标,作为减轻这一脆弱人群疾病负担的关键干预策略。