Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postgraduate Training for Applied Epidemiology (PAE), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 Jan;17(1):e13051. doi: 10.1111/irv.13051. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was detected in a nursing home in February 2021 after residents and staff had received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in January 2021.
Nursing home staff, long-term residents and day-care receivers were included in a retrospective cohort study. We calculated attack rates (AR), secondary AR (SAR) and their 95% binomial confidence interval (CI), and we compared them using Fisher's exact test or chi-squared test, depending on the sample size. We used Poisson regression with robust error estimates to calculate vaccine effectiveness against SARS-COV-2 infections. We selected variables based on directed acyclic graphs. As a proxy for viral load at diagnosis, we compared the mean Ct values at diagnosis using t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests.
The adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection was 56% (95% CI: 15-77%, p = 0.04). Ct values at diagnosis were higher when intervals after receiving the second vaccination were longer (>21 vs. ≤21 days: 4.48 cycles, p = 0.08). The SAR was 67% lower in households of vaccinated (2/9 [22.2%]) than of unvaccinated infected staff (12/18 [66.7%]; p = 0.046). Vaccination rates were lowest among staff with close physical contact to care-receivers (46%). The highest AR in vaccinated staff had those working on wards (14%).
Vaccination reduced the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, viral load and transmission; however, non-pharmaceutical interventions remain essential to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infections, even for vaccinated individuals. Vaccination coverage of staff ought to increase reduction of infections among themselves, their household members and residents.
2021 年 2 月,在居民和员工于 2021 年 1 月接受了两剂 BNT162b2 疫苗后,一家疗养院检测到 SARS-CoV-2 爆发。
疗养院工作人员、长期居民和日托接收者被纳入回顾性队列研究。我们计算了发病率(AR)、继发发病率(SAR)及其 95%二项式置信区间(CI),并根据样本量使用 Fisher 精确检验或卡方检验进行了比较。我们使用具有稳健误差估计的泊松回归来计算针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疫苗效力。我们根据有向无环图选择变量。作为诊断时病毒载量的替代指标,我们使用 t 检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较诊断时的平均 Ct 值。
调整后的疫苗对感染的有效性为 56%(95%CI:15-77%,p=0.04)。在第二次接种后间隔时间较长时(>21 天与≤21 天:4.48 个周期,p=0.08),诊断时的 Ct 值更高。在接种疫苗的家庭中,SAR 比未接种疫苗的感染员工(2/9 [22.2%])低 67%(12/18 [66.7%];p=0.046)。与接受护理的人有密切身体接触的工作人员的疫苗接种率最低(46%)。接种疫苗的工作人员中,在病房工作的工作人员的发病率最高(14%)。
接种疫苗降低了 SARS-CoV-2 感染、病毒载量和传播的风险;然而,即使对于接种疫苗的个体,非药物干预措施仍然是减少 SARS-CoV-2 感染传播的关键。增加工作人员的疫苗接种率应能减少他们自己、其家庭成员和居民的感染。