Suppr超能文献

经济激励对无家可归者 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的影响,以及影响接种率的因素:一项随机对照试验。

The effect of a financial incentive on COVID-19 vaccination uptake, and predictors of uptake, in people experiencing homelessness: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2024 Apr 11;42(10):2578-2584. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.020. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Abstract

People who are homeless are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection, and of poorer associated outcomes. Delivering vaccinations to, and ensuring uptake of multiple doses in, people who are homeless is complex. Financial incentives may improve vaccination uptake, particularly in people who have not received routine vaccinations previously, though evidence about the effect of incentives is limited and variable. This randomized controlled trial (ANZCTR 383156) assessed the effect of a financial incentive (an A$10 grocery voucher) on uptake of the second COVID-19 vaccination in Australian adults who were homeless, and who had received their first dose. Participants were recruited through a vaccination program for people experiencing homelessness between September 2021 and January 2022. They were followed-up for a minimum of 6.5 months. Uptake was measured 'on-time' at 6 weeks, and at any time during the trial period. Vaccination status was checked on the Australian Immunisation Register. Demographic and vaccination program characteristics associated with uptake were also investigated. Eighty-six people consented to participate, and 43 were randomly allocated to each of the 'incentive' and 'no incentive' groups. The incentive slightly increased the likelihood of a participant receiving a second vaccination on-time (risk difference (RD), 11.6 % [95 %CI, -9.0, 32.2 %]; p = 0.27), and at any time during the trial (RD, 14.0 % [95 %CI, -2.2, 30.1 %], p = 0.09). The incentive had a significant positive effect on uptake in people with no previous vaccination history, increasing their likelihood of receiving a second vaccination on-time (RD, 42.3 % [95 %CI, 15.7, 68.8 %]; p = 0.002) and at any time during the trial (RD, 38.7 % [95 %CI, 16.1, 61.3 %], p < 0.001). Financial incentives may increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in people who are homeless, and particularly those who have no previous vaccination history. Future research should consider alternative incentive values, types, and cost-effectiveness.

摘要

无家可归者感染 COVID-19 的风险增加,并且相关结局更差。为无家可归者接种疫苗并确保其多次接种是复杂的。经济激励措施可能会提高疫苗接种率,尤其是在以前未接受常规疫苗接种的人群中,但关于激励措施效果的证据有限且存在差异。这项随机对照试验(ANZCTR 383156)评估了经济激励(一张 10 澳元的食品券)对澳大利亚无家可归的成年人接种第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗的影响,这些人已经接种了第一剂疫苗。参与者是通过 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月期间为无家可归者开展的疫苗接种计划招募的。他们的随访时间至少为 6.5 个月。接种率在 6 周时“按时”进行测量,并在试验期间的任何时间进行测量。疫苗接种状况在澳大利亚免疫登记处进行检查。还调查了与接种率相关的人口统计学和疫苗接种计划特征。86 人同意参与,其中 43 人随机分配到“激励”和“无激励”组。激励措施略微增加了参与者按时接种第二剂疫苗的可能性(风险差异(RD),11.6%[95%CI,-9.0,32.2%];p=0.27),并且在试验期间的任何时间都有所增加(RD,14.0%[95%CI,-2.2,30.1%],p=0.09)。对于没有既往疫苗接种史的人,激励措施对提高接种率有显著的积极影响,增加了他们按时接种第二剂疫苗的可能性(RD,42.3%[95%CI,15.7,68.8%];p=0.002)和在试验期间的任何时间(RD,38.7%[95%CI,16.1,61.3%],p<0.001)。经济激励措施可能会提高无家可归者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率,尤其是那些没有既往疫苗接种史的人。未来的研究应考虑替代激励措施的价值、类型和成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验