• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.加拿大结直肠癌筛查的种族和社会人口分布:一项横断面研究。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Jun;115(3):371-383. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00859-9. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care.了解美国当前在结直肠癌筛查方面的种族/民族差异:社会经济地位和获得医疗保健的贡献。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.023.
3
Examining Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and the Role of Online Medical Record Use: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study of a National Survey.研究结直肠癌筛查中的种族差异以及在线病历使用的作用:一项全国性调查横断面研究的结果
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Dec 4;10:e53229. doi: 10.2196/53229.
4
Who, where, when: Colorectal cancer disparities by race and ethnicity, subsite, and stage.谁、何处、何时:按种族和民族、部位和分期划分的结直肠癌差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14767-14780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6105. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Race, Poverty, and Mental Health Drive Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities in the Veterans Health Administration.种族、贫困和心理健康导致退伍军人健康管理局的结直肠癌筛查存在差异。
Med Care. 2019 Oct;57(10):773-780. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001186.
6
An Intersectional Approach to Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Status.一种基于种族/族裔和移民身份的宫颈癌筛查差异的交叉性研究方法。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jan;34(2):261-270. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0251. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
7
Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities.种族/族裔结直肠癌筛查差异的决定因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1317-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1317.
8
Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening among households residing in the largely Haitian community of Little Haiti, Miami-Dade County, Florida: an observational study.佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县小海地主要为海地裔社区居民家庭中影响结直肠癌筛查依从性的因素:一项观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e806. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000806.
9
Socioeconomic and physician supply determinants of racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.社会经济和医生供应因素对结直肠癌筛查中种族差异的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Sep;8(5):e125-34. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000511. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
10
Racial minorities are more likely than whites to report lack of provider recommendation for colon cancer screening.与白人相比,少数族裔更有可能报告缺乏医疗服务提供者对结肠癌筛查的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;110(10):1388-94. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.138. Epub 2015 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Provider-perceived barriers to patient adherence to colorectal cancer screening.提供者所感知到的患者在坚持结直肠癌筛查方面的障碍。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec 27;25:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101681. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
The association between adherence to cancer screening programs and health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症筛查计划依从性与健康素养的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106927. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106927. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Impact of a health literacy intervention combining general practitioner training and a consumer facing intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in underserved areas: protocol for a multicentric cluster randomized controlled trial.改善服务不足地区结直肠癌筛查的医患培训与面向消费者干预相结合的健康素养干预效果评估:一项多中心群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1684. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11565-3.
4
The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study.丹麦一项公共资助筛查项目中健康素养与结直肠癌筛查接受情况的关联:横断面研究
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 29;19:101132. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study.丹麦贫困地区少数民族女性对癌症的认知及癌症筛查障碍 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1.
6
Area-level income disparities in colorectal screening in Canada: evidence to inform future surveillance.加拿大结直肠癌筛查的地区收入差距:为未来监测提供信息的证据。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e128-e137. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4279. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
The future burden of cancer in Canada: Long-term cancer incidence projections 2013-2042.加拿大未来的癌症负担:2013-2042 年长期癌症发病率预测。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;59:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review.人群健康干预措施以改善粪便免疫化学试验筛查结直肠癌:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
The north-south and east-west gradient in colorectal cancer risk: a look at the distribution of modifiable risk factors and incidence across Canada.结直肠癌风险的南北和东西梯度:审视加拿大可改变风险因素的分布及发病率
Curr Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(3):231-235. doi: 10.3747/co.25.4071. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Predictors of non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening among immigrants to Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.加拿大安大略省移民结直肠癌筛查不依从的预测因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

加拿大结直肠癌筛查的种族和社会人口分布:一项横断面研究。

Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Division of Population Health and Applied Health Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Data and Information Services, Digital Health, NL Health Services, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2024 Jun;115(3):371-383. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00859-9. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-024-00859-9
PMID:38485885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11151886/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in Canada, identify disparities, and evaluate the potential predictors and barriers to CRC screening.

METHODS

Data from the 2017 cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were analyzed, focusing on individuals aged 50-74 years. CRC screening participation rates were evaluated at both national and provincial levels and across various sociodemographic characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify predictors and barriers to CRC screening.

RESULTS

Of the 56,950 respondents to the 2017 CCHS, 41.7% (n = 23,727) were between 50 and 74 years of age. The overall CRC screening participation rate was 59.8%, with provinces like Alberta and Manitoba achieving rates of 65.7% and 66.5%, respectively. Significant disparities were observed across socioeconomic, geographical, and racial or ethnic groups. Notably, older adults [AOR 2.41, 95% CI 2.06‒2.83], higher income earners [AOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.77‒2.24], and non-smokers [AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.55‒2.0] had higher odds of screening, while immigrants and minority ethnic groups, especially South-East Asians [AOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29‒0.78] and South Asians [AOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44‒0.95], had lower odds of being up to date with CRC screening. A significant portion of unscreened individuals cited their healthcare provider's perception of the test as unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

While there is promising progress in CRC screening participation rates across Canada, significant disparities persist. Addressing these disparities is crucial for public health. Efforts should focus on enhancing public awareness, facilitating accessibility, and ensuring cultural appropriateness of CRC screening initiatives.

摘要

目的

评估加拿大结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的种族和社会人口分布情况,识别差异,并评估 CRC 筛查的潜在预测因素和障碍。

方法

分析了 2017 年加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS)的数据,重点关注 50-74 岁的人群。评估了国家和省级层面以及各种社会人口特征的 CRC 筛查参与率。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定 CRC 筛查的预测因素和障碍。

结果

在 2017 年 CCHS 的 56950 名受访者中,41.7%(n=23727)年龄在 50-74 岁之间。总体 CRC 筛查参与率为 59.8%,艾伯塔省和马尼托巴省的比例分别为 65.7%和 66.5%。在社会经济、地理和种族或族裔群体之间存在显著差异。值得注意的是,年龄较大的成年人(AOR 2.41,95%CI 2.06-2.83)、高收入者(AOR 1.99,95%CI 1.77-2.24)和不吸烟者(AOR 1.76,95%CI 1.55-2.0)的筛查可能性更高,而移民和少数民族群体,特别是东南亚人(AOR 0.48,95%CI 0.29-0.78)和南亚人(AOR 0.65,95%CI 0.44-0.95),则不太可能按时接受 CRC 筛查。很大一部分未接受筛查的人表示,他们的医疗保健提供者认为该测试没有必要。

结论

尽管加拿大的 CRC 筛查参与率有了令人鼓舞的进展,但仍存在显著差异。解决这些差异对于公共卫生至关重要。应努力提高公众意识,促进可及性,并确保 CRC 筛查计划具有文化适宜性。