• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国西南地区住院医师对科研不端行为的认知、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。

Knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in southwest China: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Health, The Second Nanning People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.

Department of Science and Education, The Second Nanning People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05277-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05277-6
PMID:38486182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10941492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of numerous scientific outputs, growing attention is paid to research misconduct. This study aimed to investigate knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in southwest China.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in southwest China from November 2022 through March 2023. The links to the questionnaire were sent to the directors of the teaching management department in 17 tertiary hospitals. Answers were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with research misconduct among residents.

RESULTS

6200 residents were enrolled in the study, and 88.5% of participants attended a course on research integrity, but 53.7% of participants admitted to having committed at least one form of research misconduct. Having a postgraduate or above, publishing papers as the first author or corresponding author, attending a course on research integrity, lower self-reported knowledge on research integrity and lower perceived consequences for research misconduct were positively correlated to research misconduct. Serving as a primary investigator for a research project was negatively associated with research misconduct. Most residents (66.3%) agreed that the reason for research misconduct is that researchers lack research ability.

CONCLUSIONS

The high self-reported rate of research misconduct among residents in southwest China underscores a universal necessity for enhancing research integrity courses in residency programs. The ineffectiveness of current training in China suggests a possible global need for reevaluating and improving educational approaches to foster research integrity. Addressing these challenges is imperative not only for the credibility of medical research and patient care in China but also for maintaining the highest ethical standards in medical education worldwide. Policymakers, educators, and healthcare leaders on a global scale should collaborate to establish comprehensive strategies that ensure the responsible conduct of research, ultimately safeguarding the integrity of medical advancements and promoting trust in scientific endeavors across borders.

摘要

背景

随着大量科学产出的出现,人们越来越关注研究不端行为。本研究旨在调查中国西南地区医学住院医师对研究不端行为的知识、态度和实践。

方法

2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 3 月在中国西南地区进行了一项横断面研究。研究向 17 家三级医院的教学管理部门主任发送了问卷链接。收集并分析了答案。采用逻辑回归分析探讨了与住院医师研究不端行为相关的因素。

结果

共有 6200 名住院医师参加了这项研究,88.5%的参与者参加了研究诚信课程,但 53.7%的参与者承认至少有一种形式的研究不端行为。具有研究生或以上学历、以第一作者或通讯作者身份发表论文、参加研究诚信课程、自我报告的研究诚信知识较低、对研究不端行为的感知后果较低与研究不端行为呈正相关。作为研究项目的主要研究者与研究不端行为呈负相关。大多数住院医师(66.3%)认为研究不端行为的原因是研究人员缺乏研究能力。

结论

中国西南地区住院医师自我报告的研究不端行为率较高,突显了在住院医师培训计划中加强研究诚信课程的普遍必要性。中国目前培训的无效性表明,可能需要重新评估和改进全球教育方法,以培养研究诚信。解决这些挑战不仅对中国的医学研究和患者护理的可信度至关重要,而且对维护全球医学教育的最高伦理标准也至关重要。全球的政策制定者、教育者和医疗保健领导者应合作制定全面战略,确保负责任地开展研究,最终保护医学进步的完整性,并在全球范围内促进对科学努力的信任。

相似文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in southwest China: a cross-sectional study.中国西南地区住院医师对科研不端行为的认知、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05277-6.
2
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices About Research Integrity and Scientific Misconduct Among the Faculty and Medical Postgraduates Working in Medical Colleges in North Karnataka and Central India: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.印度北部卡纳塔克邦和中部医学院教职工及医学研究生对研究诚信和科学不端行为的认知、态度及行为:一项横断面在线调查
Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59200. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
4
Residents' breastfeeding knowledge, comfort, practices, and perceptions: results of the Breastfeeding Resident Education Study (BRESt).居民母乳喂养知识、舒适度、实践和看法:母乳喂养住院医师教育研究(BRESt)的结果。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 22;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1150-7.
5
Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.科研不端行为及相关因素:对中国三家三级医院研究人员的调查
Account Res. 2021 Feb;28(2):95-114. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1809386. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
Research misconduct knowledge and associated factors among nurses in China: A national cross-sectional survey.中国护士的科研不端行为知识及相关因素:一项全国性横断面调查。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Feb;69:151658. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151658. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism.打击科研不端行为:专题研讨会在改变对抄袭态度方面的作用。
Cureus. 2018 May 28;10(5):e2698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2698.
8
Teaching testicular self-examination: education and practices in pediatric residents.睾丸自我检查教学:儿科住院医师的教育与实践
Pediatrics. 2003 Mar;111(3):e239-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.3.e239.
9
Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.研究中的不当行为:对一个发展中国家的态度、认知及相关因素的描述性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
10
Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.中国生物医学研究人员对学术不端行为的认知:2015 年与 2010 年的比较。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):629-645. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9913-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of case-based learning and traditional lecture in teaching residents on research misconduct: a controlled before-and-after study.基于案例的学习与传统讲座在向住院医师传授科研不端行为知识方面的比较:一项前后对照研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 25;20(4):e0322336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322336. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
China conducts first nationwide review of retractions and research misconduct.中国首次开展全国范围内的撤稿及科研不端行为审查。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8000):700-701. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00397-x.
2
Research misconduct knowledge and associated factors among nurses in China: A national cross-sectional survey.中国护士的科研不端行为知识及相关因素:一项全国性横断面调查。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Feb;69:151658. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151658. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Research Integrity Attitudes and Behaviors are Difficult to alter: Results from a ten Year Follow-up Study in Norway.研究诚信态度和行为难以改变:来自挪威十年随访研究的结果。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Feb-Apr;18(1-2):50-57. doi: 10.1177/15562646221150032. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.挪威研究人员中存在可疑的研究行为和不当行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Dec 21;28(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00351-4.
5
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.评估伊朗的科研不端行为:伊朗医学教师的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00642-2.
6
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.一项以研究伦理和研究诚信案例为特色的文献综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8.
7
Registered nurses understanding of academic honesty and the perceived relationship to professional conduct: Findings from a cross-sectional survey conducted in Southeast Asia.注册护士对学术诚信的理解及其与职业行为的感知关系:在东南亚进行的横断面调查的结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104794. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104794. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease.基于问题的学习(PBL)与基于案例的学习(CBL)相结合的教学方法在甲状腺疾病临床实践教学中的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y.
9
Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Seminar 教学法与基于讲座的学习在医学教育中的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Med Teach. 2020 Dec;42(12):1343-1349. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1805100. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.科研不端行为及相关因素:对中国三家三级医院研究人员的调查
Account Res. 2021 Feb;28(2):95-114. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1809386. Epub 2020 Sep 7.