Koralesky Katherine E, Rankin Janet M, Fraser David
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N1N4, Canada.
Anim Welf. 2023 Jan 26;32:e3. doi: 10.1017/awf.2022.4. eCollection 2023.
A diverse research literature now exists on the animals, staff and organisations involved in animal sheltering. We reviewed this research through the lens of institutional ethnography, a method of inquiry that focuses on the actual work that people do within institutions. The main topics, identified through a larger ethnographic study of animal sheltering, were: (i) research about shelter staff and officers; (ii) the relinquishment of animals to shelters; and (iii) animals' length of stay in shelters. After reviewing the literature, we held focus groups with shelter personnel to explore how their work experiences are or are not represented in the research. The review showed that stress caused by performing euthanasia has attracted much research, but the decision-making that leads to euthanasia, which may involve multiple staff and potential conflict, has received little attention. Research on 'compassion fatigue' has also tended to focus on euthanasia but a granular description about the practical and emotional work that personnel undertake that generates such fatigue is missing. Published research on both relinquishment and length of stay is dominated by metrics (questionnaires) and often relies upon shelter records, despite their limitations. Less research has examined the actual work processes involved in managing relinquishment as well as monitoring and reducing animals' length of stay. Institutional ethnography's focus on people's work activities can provide a different and more nuanced understanding of what is happening in animal sheltering and how it might better serve the needs of the animals and staff.
现在有大量关于动物收容所中的动物、工作人员和组织的研究文献。我们通过制度民族志的视角对这些研究进行了回顾,制度民族志是一种探究方法,侧重于人们在机构内实际从事的工作。通过对动物收容所进行的一项规模更大的民族志研究确定的主要主题包括:(i)关于收容所工作人员和官员的研究;(ii)将动物送交收容所的情况;以及(iii)动物在收容所的停留时间。在回顾文献之后,我们与收容所工作人员举行了焦点小组讨论,以探讨他们的工作经历在研究中是否得到体现。回顾表明,实施安乐死所造成的压力已吸引了大量研究,但导致安乐死的决策(这可能涉及多名工作人员以及潜在冲突)却很少受到关注。关于“同情疲劳”的研究也往往侧重于安乐死,但缺少对工作人员所从事的导致这种疲劳的实际工作和情感工作的细致描述。关于送交和停留时间的已发表研究主要以指标(问卷调查)为主,并且常常依赖收容所记录,尽管这些记录存在局限性。较少有研究考察了管理送交以及监测和缩短动物停留时间所涉及的实际工作流程。制度民族志对人们工作活动的关注能够为动物收容所正在发生的事情以及它如何能更好地满足动物和工作人员的需求提供一种不同的、更细致入微的理解。