Carini Robert M, Sinski Jennifer, Weber Jonetta D
Department of Sociology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Department of Sociology, Bellarmine University, Louisville, KY 40205, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 23;10(10):1720. doi: 10.3390/ani10101720.
Some nonhuman animal shelters have developed rehoming programs for black cats to remedy what they believe are their higher rates of euthanasia and lower rates of adoption. This study reviews humans' preferences/aversions to cats of various coat colors and uses contingency tables and multinomial logistic regression to test possible differences in outcomes (euthanasia, adoption, or transfer) for 7983 cats that entered an urban public shelter in Kentucky, USA from 2010 through 2011. While coat color overall was negligibly associated with cat outcomes in a contingency table, the pairwise difference between black and white cats was significant ( < 0.05) and nontrivial in strength. Specifically, black cats experienced the highest euthanasia and lowest adoption rates, while white cats had the lowest euthanasia and highest adoption rates. Brown, gray, and orange cats experienced similar outcomes, but middling between those of black and white cats. These patterns by color remained weak but significant after controlling for breed and stray status in regression analysis, with the exception of orange and white, which did not differ significantly. A subsample of 1219 entirely black cats was analyzed to assess whether they had different outcomes during the run-up to Halloween; their October percentages of adoption and transfer were comparable to or lower than all other months of the calendar year. Thus, this study did not find that outcomes improved for black cats during October. Overall, this study provides weak support for what has been termed "Black Cat Bias" by others, and hints that black cats in public shelters should receive extra consideration for rehoming, particularly if such efforts do not substantially redirect resources from other initiatives.
一些非人类动物收容所为黑猫制定了重新安置计划,以补救他们认为黑猫较高的安乐死率和较低的领养率。本研究回顾了人类对各种毛色猫咪的偏好/厌恶,并使用列联表和多项逻辑回归来测试2010年至2011年进入美国肯塔基州一个城市公共收容所的7983只猫咪在结局(安乐死、领养或转移)方面可能存在的差异。虽然在列联表中,毛色总体上与猫咪的结局关联甚微,但黑猫和白猫之间的成对差异显著(<0.05)且强度不小。具体而言,黑猫的安乐死率最高,领养率最低,而白猫的安乐死率最低,领养率最高。棕色、灰色和橙色猫咪的结局相似,但介于黑猫和白猫之间。在回归分析中控制了品种和流浪状态后,按毛色划分的这些模式仍然微弱但显著,橙色和白色除外,它们没有显著差异。对1219只全黑猫的子样本进行了分析,以评估它们在万圣节前夕是否有不同的结局;它们10月份的领养和转移百分比与日历年度的所有其他月份相当或更低。因此,本研究没有发现10月份黑猫的结局有所改善。总体而言,本研究为其他人所称的“黑猫偏见”提供了微弱支持,并暗示公共收容所中的黑猫在重新安置时应得到额外考虑,特别是如果此类努力不会从其他举措中大幅重新分配资源。