Purdue University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, 403 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907 United States.
University of California, Davis Agricultural Economics and Econometrics, 2116 Social Sciences and Humanities, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Aug;181:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105073. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Changing consumer shopping behaviors, and specifically the shift towards online procurement of goods and services, have altered the retail landscape of nearly all goods, including pet products and services. Whilst it is known and commonly discussed that less retail business for products and medications is being conducted in clinics than in the past, it is not well documented where that commerce is now taking place, and by what customer segments. For cats, dogs, and other pets, specialty food and food in general was purchased by a high percentage of respondents at the physical store. Sixteen-percent of dog owners, 17 % of cat owners and 14 % of other animal owners purchased prescription food at the veterinarian. Ten percent of dog owners, 10 % of cat owners, and 9 % of other animal owners purchased prescription food from the physical store. A high percentage of cat and dog owners purchased flea and tick preventative, heartworm preventative and prescription medications at the veterinarian, followed by the physical store. Using a choice experiment, both dog and cat owners were willing-to-pay a statistically significant positive amount for having their veterinarian, or a veterinarian in their community (who was not their veterinarian) on the veterinary telemedicine call or video when compared to a veterinarian from outside the community. In relation to the willingness to pay (WTP) for a telemedicine veterinary consultation with a veterinarian outside of the pet owners' community, dog owners were willing to pay $38.04 more for a telemedicine veterinary consultation with their regular veterinarian, and $13.38 more for a telemedicine veterinary consultation with a veterinarian in the dog owners' community. Cat owners had a WTP of $38.12 per call or visit for having their veterinarian as the consultant which was statistically higher than their WTP for a veterinarian in their community, $12.74 when compared to a veterinarian outside their community. When comparing the mean price adjusted WTP between cat and dog owners, there were not any statistically significant differences found. Quantifying pet owner willingness to pay for commonly discussed attributes of telemedicine, such as whether a local veterinarian is consulted (versus a veterinarian from outside the community), facilitates veterinary practice management decision making as practices adjust product and service offerings to meet the changing consumer demand of pet owners in today's marketplace.
消费者购物行为的变化,特别是网上采购商品和服务的趋势,改变了几乎所有商品的零售格局,包括宠物产品和服务。虽然人们普遍知道,过去在诊所进行的产品和药物的零售业务减少了,但现在这种商业活动在哪里进行,以及哪些客户群体在进行这种活动,并没有很好地记录下来。对于猫、狗和其他宠物来说,有很高比例的受访者会在实体店购买特种食品和一般食品。16%的狗主人、17%的猫主人和 14%的其他动物主人会在兽医那里购买处方食品。10%的狗主人、10%的猫主人和 9%的其他动物主人会从实体店购买处方食品。有很高比例的猫和狗主人会在兽医那里购买跳蚤和蜱虫预防药、心丝虫预防药和处方药,其次是在实体店购买。通过选择实验,狗和猫的主人都愿意为他们的兽医,或者他们所在社区(不是他们的兽医)的兽医,在兽医远程医疗电话或视频中接听电话或视频支付一笔有统计学意义的正金额,而不是由社区外的兽医接听。关于对社区外宠物主人的兽医远程医疗咨询的支付意愿(WTP),狗主人愿意为他们的常规兽医进行远程医疗咨询支付 38.04 美元,为他们所在社区的兽医进行远程医疗咨询支付 13.38 美元。猫主人每次电话或就诊的 WTP 为 38.12 美元,要求他们的兽医作为顾问,这一数字明显高于他们对所在社区兽医的 WTP,与社区外兽医相比,这一数字为 12.74 美元。在比较猫和狗主人的平均价格调整 WTP 时,没有发现任何统计学上的显著差异。量化宠物主人对远程医疗常见属性的支付意愿,例如是否咨询当地兽医(与社区外的兽医相比),有助于兽医实践管理决策,因为实践需要调整产品和服务,以满足当今市场上宠物主人不断变化的需求。