Suppr超能文献

关于再生农业是否改善动物福利的系统评价:基于“同一福利”视角的定性分析

A systematic review on whether regenerative agriculture improves animal welfare: A qualitative analysis with a One Welfare perspective.

作者信息

Hargreaves-Méndez Matías Javier, Hötzel María José

机构信息

Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal (LETA), Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 1346, Itacorubi, 88034-001, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

Anim Welf. 2023 Apr 25;32:e36. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.28. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The welfare of animals in food-production systems is a cause of concern to the public. Regenerative agriculture was first used by the Rodale Institute and proposes to regenerate degraded components of ecosystems, aiming to be more than just sustainable. However, despite animal welfare being pushed to be part of the SDG agenda for 2030, there is no clarity on how regenerative agriculture impacts animal welfare. It is challenging to determine regenerative agriculture impacts on animal welfare, since it is not entirely defined. One Welfare could help define entry points for future research by studying animal welfare in connection with human welfare and environmental conservation. We aimed to analyse the extent to which positive animal welfare outcomes characterise regenerative agriculture systems in peer-reviewed articles and whether the narratives of such articles support that regenerative agriculture promotes animal welfare directly or indirectly by improving human welfare and environmental conservation. We searched papers including 'regenerative agriculture' using PRISMA-P, selecting animal welfare, human welfare, environment conservation terms, developed themes, and carried out analysis using Atlas.Ti8 and Causal Loop Diagram. We found that papers mainly linked animal welfare to animal health, human welfare to financial farm status and farmer's self-awareness, and environmental conservation to soil improvement. Causal Loop Diagram indicated that regenerative agriculture had the potential to improve the health and nutrition components of animal welfare by enhancing financial farmers' status/self-awareness (human welfare), and the soil (environmental conservation), reflecting that the processes that affect human welfare and environmental conservation could also affect animal welfare. However, information in papers remains insufficient to determine how regenerative agriculture impacts on animal welfare and research into regenerative agriculture needs to extend its focus on animal welfare and elucidate the regenerative agriculture principles leading to animal welfare.

摘要

食品生产系统中动物的福利是公众关注的一个问题。再生农业最初由罗代尔研究所提出,旨在恢复生态系统退化的组成部分,目标不仅仅是可持续发展。然而,尽管动物福利被纳入了2030年可持续发展目标议程,但对于再生农业如何影响动物福利尚无明确结论。由于再生农业并未完全明确界定,因此很难确定其对动物福利的影响。“同一健康”理念通过研究动物福利与人类福利及环境保护的关系,可能有助于确定未来研究的切入点。我们旨在分析同行评议文章中再生农业系统在多大程度上具有积极的动物福利成果,以及这些文章的叙述是否支持再生农业通过改善人类福利和环境保护直接或间接促进动物福利。我们使用PRISMA-P检索了包含“再生农业”的论文,选择了动物福利、人类福利、环境保护术语,确定了主题,并使用Atlas.Ti8和因果循环图进行分析。我们发现,论文主要将动物福利与动物健康联系起来,将人类福利与农场财务状况和农民自我认知联系起来,将环境保护与土壤改良联系起来。因果循环图表明,再生农业有可能通过提高农民的财务状况/自我认知(人类福利)和改善土壤(环境保护)来改善动物福利的健康和营养成分,这反映出影响人类福利和环境保护的过程也可能影响动物福利。然而,论文中的信息仍不足以确定再生农业如何影响动物福利,对再生农业的研究需要扩大对动物福利的关注,并阐明导致动物福利的再生农业原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23fd/10936273/996e504b20c8/S0962728623000283_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验