Suppr超能文献

中国糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的成本效用分析。

Cost-Utility Analysis of Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy in China.

作者信息

Zhang Yue, Bai Weiling, Li Ruyue, Du Yifan, Sun Runzhou, Li Tao, Kang Hong, Yang Ziwei, Tang Jianjun, Wang Ningli, Liu Hanruo

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing, China.

College of Computer Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Health Data Sci. 2022 Mar 12;2022:9832185. doi: 10.34133/2022/9832185. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has been primarily indicated to cause vision impairment and blindness, while no studies have focused on the cost-utility of telemedicine-based and community screening programs for DR in China, especially in rural and urban areas, respectively.. We developed a Markov model to calculate the cost-utility of screening programs for DR in DM patients in rural and urban settings from the societal perspective. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was calculated for the assessment.. In the rural setting, the community screening program obtained 1 QALY with a cost of $4179 (95% CI 3859 to 5343), and the telemedicine screening program had an ICUR of $2323 (95% CI 1023 to 3903) compared with no screening, both of which satisfied the criterion of a significantly cost-effective health intervention. Likewise, community screening programs in urban areas generated an ICUR of $3812 (95% CI 2906 to 4167) per QALY gained, with telemedicine screening at an ICUR of $2437 (95% CI 1242 to 3520) compared with no screening, and both were also cost-effective. By further comparison, compared to community screening programs, telemedicine screening yielded an ICUR of 1212 (95% CI 896 to 1590) per incremental QALY gained in rural setting and 1141 (95% CI 859 to 1403) in urban setting, which both meet the criterion for a significantly cost-effective health intervention.. Both telemedicine and community screening for DR in rural and urban settings were cost-effective in China, and telemedicine screening programs were more cost-effective.

摘要

糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)主要被认为会导致视力损害和失明,然而在中国,尤其是分别在农村和城市地区,尚未有研究关注基于远程医疗和社区筛查项目对DR的成本效益。我们构建了一个马尔可夫模型,从社会角度计算农村和城市环境中糖尿病患者DR筛查项目的成本效益。计算增量成本效益比(ICUR)用于评估。在农村环境中,社区筛查项目获得1个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为4179美元(95%置信区间3859至5343),与未筛查相比,远程医疗筛查项目的ICUR为2323美元(95%置信区间1023至3903),二者均满足具有显著成本效益的健康干预标准。同样,城市地区的社区筛查项目每获得1个QALY的ICUR为3812美元(95%置信区间2906至4167),与未筛查相比,远程医疗筛查的ICUR为2437美元(95%置信区间1242至3520),二者也具有成本效益。通过进一步比较,与社区筛查项目相比,远程医疗筛查在农村环境中每增加1个QALY的ICUR为1212美元(95%置信区间896至1590),在城市环境中为1141美元(95%置信区间859至1403),均符合具有显著成本效益的健康干预标准。在中国农村和城市环境中,远程医疗和社区对DR的筛查均具有成本效益,且远程医疗筛查项目更具成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e55/10904067/b876012289d3/9832185.fig.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验