Suppr超能文献

美国医学院的晋升和终身教职政策与实践:终身教职是否无关紧要,还是比以往任何时候都更重要?

Promotion and Tenure Policies and Practices at U.S. Medical Schools: Is Tenure Irrelevant or More Relevant Than Ever?

出版信息

Acad Med. 2024 Jul 1;99(7):724-732. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005689. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Abstract

Promotion and tenure (P&T) have been common mechanisms to support and nurture faculty at higher education institutions and, therefore, have been of continual interest to medical school faculty and administrators. In the last decade, significant changes in the academic medicine sector have occurred, including new medical schools, mergers and acquisitions of academic hospitals and health systems, and institutional and societal efforts to address systemic racism and inequality. In addition, societal controversies have revived long-dormant concerns about academic freedom for medical school faculty, a bedrock principle of U.S. higher education for more than a century. These developments raise the question of whether tenure at medical schools is increasingly irrelevant for large numbers of full-time faculty or more relevant than ever.Using a 2022 survey of 118 medical schools, a review of P&T policies at 37 other medical schools, and an analysis of Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster data, the authors review the prevalence of tenure systems at U.S. MD-granting medical schools; trends in the use of such systems for full-time basic science and clinical faculty; models of including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria in P&T standards; and alterations to introduce greater flexibility into the P&T process.The authors' analysis shows that, although tenure systems remain well established at U.S. MD-granting medical schools, the percentage of full-time faculty on tenured or tenure-eligible tracks declined over the last 4 decades. Troubling gaps in tenure-eligible appointments persist between men and women faculty and among faculty by race and ethnicity. Medical schools have begun to deploy a variety of tactics in P&T processes focused on DEI to address these systemic inequities. To adapt the traditional tenure system to meet the needs of academic medicine, medical schools have altered their policies, including tenure financial guarantees, probationary period extensions, and post-tenure review.

摘要

晋升和终身教职(P&T)一直是支持和培养高等教育机构教师的常见机制,因此一直是医学院教师和管理人员持续关注的焦点。在过去的十年中,学术医学领域发生了重大变化,包括新医学院的成立、学术医院和医疗系统的合并和收购,以及机构和社会为解决系统性种族主义和不平等问题所做的努力。此外,社会争议重新引发了人们对医学院教师学术自由的长期休眠的关注,这是美国高等教育一个多世纪以来的基石原则。这些发展提出了一个问题,即终身教职是否对越来越多的全职教师变得不那么重要,或者比以往任何时候都更加重要。

作者使用了 2022 年对 118 所医学院的调查、对 37 所其他医学院的 P&T 政策的审查以及对美国医师学院教师名册数据的分析,回顾了美国 MD 授予医学院的终身教职系统的流行程度;全职基础科学和临床教师使用这些系统的趋势;将多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)标准纳入 P&T 标准的模型;以及为引入 P&T 过程更大的灵活性而进行的修改。

作者的分析表明,尽管终身教职系统在美国 MD 授予医学院仍然得到很好的建立,但在过去的 40 年里,有终身教职或有资格获得终身教职的全职教师的比例有所下降。在有资格获得终身教职的任命方面,男女教师之间以及不同种族和族裔的教师之间仍然存在着令人不安的差距。医学院已经开始在 P&T 过程中部署各种策略,以关注 DEI,解决这些系统性不平等问题。为了使传统的终身教职制度适应学术医学的需要,医学院已经修改了其政策,包括终身教职的财务保障、试用期延长和终身教职后审查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验