Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, Victoria, BC V8N 5M8, Canada; University of Victoria School of Nursing, Box 1700 Stn CSC, Victoria, BC 250, Canada.
Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Health Care, 570-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z IY6b, Canada.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jun;161:209341. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209341. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
North America has been in an unrelenting overdose crisis for almost a decade. British Columbia (BC), Canada declared a public health emergency due to overdoses in 2016. Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) for prescribing pharmaceutical opioids, stimulants and benzodiazepine alternatives to the toxic drug supply ("safer supply") was implemented in March 2020 in an attempt to reduce harms of COVID-19 and overdose deaths in BC during dual declared public health emergencies. Our objective was to describe early implementation of RMG among prescribers in BC.
We conducted a convergent mixed methods study drawing population-level linked administrative health data and qualitative interviews with 17 prescribers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) informs our work. The study utilized seven linked databases, capturing the characteristics of prescribers for people with substance use disorder to describe the characteristics of those prescribing under the RMG using univariate summary statistics and logistic regression analysis. For the qualitative analysis, we drew on interpretative descriptive methodology to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.
Analysis of administrative databases demonstrated limited uptake of the intervention outside large urban centres and a highly specific profile of urban prescribers, with larger and more complex caseloads associated with RMG prescribing. Nurse practitioners were three times more likely to prescribe than general practitioners. Qualitatively, the study identified five themes related to the five CFIR domains: 1) RMG is helpful but controversial; 2) Motivations and challenges to prescribing; 3) New options and opportunities for care but not enough to 'win the arms race'; 4) Lack of implementation support and resources; 5) Limited infrastructure.
BC's implementation of RMG was limited in scope, prescriber uptake and geographic scale up. Systemic, organizational and individual barriers and facilitators point to the importance of engaging professional regulatory colleges, implementation planning and organizational infrastructure to ensure effective implementation and adaptation to context.
北美地区正处于一场持续不断的阿片类药物过量危机之中,这场危机已持续近十年。2016 年,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)因过量用药而宣布进入公共卫生紧急状态。2020 年 3 月,为了减少 COVID-19 对 BC 的危害以及双重宣布的公共卫生紧急情况下的过量死亡人数,BC 省实施了风险缓解指导(RMG),为有毒药物供应开处医药类阿片、兴奋剂和苯二氮䓬类药物替代品(“安全供应”),以减少危害。我们的目标是描述 BC 省的医生在早期实施 RMG 的情况。
我们进行了一项收敛混合方法研究,利用人群水平的链接行政健康数据和对 17 名医生的定性访谈。综合实施研究框架(CFIR)为我们的工作提供了信息。该研究利用七个链接数据库,描述了接受物质使用障碍治疗的医生的特征,使用单变量总结统计和逻辑回归分析描述了根据 RMG 开处方的医生的特征。对于定性分析,我们借鉴了解释性描述方法,以确定实施的障碍和促进因素。
对行政数据库的分析表明,该干预措施在大型城市中心以外的地区采用有限,城市医生的情况非常特殊,与 RMG 处方相关的是更大和更复杂的病例量。执业护士开处方的可能性是普通医生的三倍。从定性上看,研究确定了与五个 CFIR 领域相关的五个主题:1)RMG 很有帮助,但有争议;2)开处方的动机和挑战;3)新的护理选择和机会,但不足以“赢得军备竞赛”;4)缺乏实施支持和资源;5)基础设施有限。
BC 实施 RMG 的范围、医生的参与度和地理范围都很有限。系统、组织和个人的障碍和促进因素表明,必须让专业监管学院参与进来,进行实施规划和组织基础设施建设,以确保有效实施并适应环境。