Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Jul-Aug;34(4):370-380. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
Undocumented immigrants face many barriers in accessing pregnancy care, including language differences, implicit and explicit bias, limited or no insurance coverage, and fear about accessing services. With the national spotlight on maternal health inequities, the current literature on undocumented immigrants during pregnancy requires synthesis.
We aimed to describe the literature on pregnancy care utilization, experiences, and outcomes of undocumented individuals in the United States.
We performed a scoping review of original research studies in the United States that described the undocumented population specifically and examined pregnancy care utilization, experiences, and outcomes. Studies underwent title, abstract, and full-text review by two investigators. Data were extracted and synthesized using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
A total of 5,940 articles were retrieved and 3,949 remained after de-duplication. After two investigators screened and reviewed the articles, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. The definition of undocumented individuals varied widely across studies. Of the 29 articles, 24 showed that undocumented status and anti-immigrant policies and rhetoric are associated with lower care utilization and worse pregnancy outcomes, while inclusive health care and immigration policies are associated with higher levels of prenatal and postnatal care utilization as well as better pregnancy outcomes.
The small, heterogeneous literature on undocumented immigrants and pregnancy care is fraught with inconsistent definitions, precluding comparisons across studies. Despite areas in need of further research, the signal among published studies is that undocumented individuals experience variable access to pregnancy care, heightened fear and stress regarding their status during pregnancy, and worse outcomes compared with other groups, including documented immigrants.
无证移民在获得妊娠护理方面面临诸多障碍,包括语言差异、隐性和显性偏见、保险覆盖范围有限或没有、以及对获取服务的担忧。随着全国对母婴健康不平等问题的关注,目前关于妊娠期间无证移民的文献需要进行综合分析。
我们旨在描述美国无证移民妊娠护理的利用情况、经历和结果方面的文献。
我们对在美国进行的原始研究进行了范围界定审查,这些研究专门描述了无证人口,并考察了妊娠护理的利用情况、经历和结果。研究由两名调查员进行标题、摘要和全文审查。使用描述性统计和内容分析来提取和综合数据。
共检索到 5940 篇文章,去重后剩余 3949 篇。经过两名调查员筛选和审查文章后,有 29 项研究符合纳入标准。无证移民的定义在研究中差异很大。在这 29 篇文章中,有 24 篇表明无证身份和反移民政策和言论与较低的护理利用率和较差的妊娠结局相关,而包容性的医疗保健和移民政策与较高水平的产前和产后护理利用率以及更好的妊娠结局相关。
无证移民和妊娠护理方面的文献数量较少且异质性较大,由于定义不一致,难以进行研究间的比较。尽管在进一步研究方面存在一些不足之处,但已发表研究的信号表明,无证移民在妊娠期间获得妊娠护理的机会存在差异,对其身份的恐惧和压力增加,且与其他群体(包括有证移民)相比,妊娠结局更差。