Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany.
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vasc Med. 2024 Aug;29(4):405-415. doi: 10.1177/1358863X241231943. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
This study aimed to assess the peri- and postprocedural outcomes of atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of the common femoral (CFA) and popliteal arteries. Phoenix atherectomy was used for the treatment of 73 and 53 de novo CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, in 122 consecutive patients. Safety endpoints encompassed perforation and peripheral embolization. Postprocedural endpoints included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and clinical success (an improvement of ⩾ 2 Rutherford category [RC]). In addition, 531 patients treated for popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion without atherectomy were used as a comparator group. Procedural success (residual stenosis < 30% after treatment) was 99.2%. The need for bail-out stenting was 2 (2.7%) and 3 (5.7%) in CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively. Only one (1.4%) embolization occurred in the CFA, which was treated by catheter aspiration. No perforations occurred. After 1.50 (IQR = 1.17-2.20) years, CD-TLR occurred in seven (9.2%) and six (14.6%) patients with CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, whereas clinical success was achieved in 62 (91.2%) and 31 (75.6%), respectively. Patients treated with atherectomy and DCB in the popliteal artery after matching for baseline RC, lesion calcification, length, and the presence of chronic total occlusion, exhibited higher freedom from CD-TLR compared to the nondebulking group (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, = 0.03). Atherectomy can be used safely and is associated with low rates of bail-out stenting in CFA and popliteal arteries. CD-TLR and clinical success rates are clinically acceptable. In addition, for the popliteal artery, atherectomy combined with DCB demonstrates lower CD-TLR rates compared to a DCB alone strategy. ().
这项研究旨在评估动脉粥样切除术辅助腔内治疗股浅动脉(CFA)和腘动脉的围手术期和术后结果。Phoenix 动脉粥样切除术分别用于治疗 122 例连续患者中的 73 例和 53 例初发 CFA 和腘动脉病变。安全性终点包括穿孔和外周栓塞。术后终点包括无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)和临床成功(Rutherford 分类[RC]至少改善 ⩾2 级)。此外,还将 531 例未经动脉粥样切除术治疗的腘动脉狭窄或闭塞患者作为对照组。手术成功率(治疗后残余狭窄<30%)为 99.2%。需要挽救性支架置入的 CFA 和腘动脉病变分别为 2(2.7%)和 3(5.7%)例。仅 CFA 发生 1 次(1.4%)栓塞,采用导管抽吸治疗。无穿孔发生。1.50 年后(IQR=1.17-2.20),CFA 和腘动脉病变分别有 7 例(9.2%)和 6 例(14.6%)发生 CD-TLR,而临床成功率分别为 62 例(91.2%)和 31 例(75.6%)。对基线 RC、病变钙化、长度和慢性完全闭塞存在进行匹配后,在腘动脉中接受动脉粥样切除术和 DCB 治疗的患者与非去细胞组相比,CD-TLR 发生率更高(HR=3.1;95%CI=1.1-8.5, =0.03)。动脉粥样切除术可安全使用,在 CFA 和腘动脉中,挽救性支架置入率较低。CD-TLR 和临床成功率均具有临床可接受性。此外,对于腘动脉,动脉粥样切除术联合 DCB 与单独 DCB 策略相比,CD-TLR 发生率较低。()。