Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul-Aug;69(4):646-660. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of irreversible visual impairment among people aged 50 years and older. Earlier research has indicated that the communication process between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) leaves considerable room for improvement in AMD care. Effective communication is essential to enhance trust in the professional and understanding of the diagnosis and treatment, and decrease anxiety and stress related to illness. We review patients' experiences, needs and preferences regarding information provision, communication style of the HCP and shared decision-making. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science. Study quality was assessed using standard checklists of quality measures. Our search returned 31 eligible articles. Findings indicated current deficits in information provision for people with AMD. Patients were often ill-informed regarding the chronic character of the condition, treatment duration, nutrition, and visual aids and low vision rehabilitation. Many patients were not actively involved during the decision-making process. Altogether, patients with AMD are faced with challenges in terms of patient-HCP communication. Methods of providing information and discussing possible options for care need to be further investigated and improved for this patient group.
年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是 50 岁及以上人群中导致不可逆性视力损害的最常见原因。早期研究表明,患者与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间的沟通过程在 AMD 护理方面仍有很大的改进空间。有效的沟通对于增强对专业人员的信任、理解诊断和治疗以及降低与疾病相关的焦虑和压力至关重要。我们回顾了患者在信息提供、HCP 的沟通方式和共同决策方面的体验、需求和偏好。我们在 PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统搜索。使用标准质量措施检查表评估研究质量。我们的搜索返回了 31 篇符合条件的文章。研究结果表明,目前 AMD 患者的信息提供存在缺陷。患者通常对病情的慢性特征、治疗持续时间、营养以及视觉辅助设备和低视力康复知之甚少。许多患者在决策过程中并未积极参与。总之,AMD 患者在医患沟通方面面临挑战。需要进一步研究和改进为这一患者群体提供信息和讨论护理选择的方法。