Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1(st) Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209351. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209351. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, reduce overdose risk and improve outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, historically, most non-opioid treatment program (non-OTP) specialty substance use treatment programs have not offered buprenorphine. Understanding barriers to offering buprenorphine in specialty substance use treatment settings is critical for expanding access to buprenorphine. This study aims to examine program-level attitudinal, financial, and regulatory factors that influence clients' access to buprenorphine in state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs.
We surveyed leadership from state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs in New Jersey about organizational characteristics, including medications provided on- and off-site and percentage of OUD clients receiving any type of MOUD, and perceived attitudinal, financial, and regulatory barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine. The study estimated prevalence of barriers and compared high MOUD reach (n = 36, 35 %) and low MOUD reach (n = 66, 65 %) programs.
Most responding organizations offered at least one type of MOUD either on- or off-site (n = 80, 78 %). However, 71 % of organizations stated that fewer than a quarter of their clients with OUD use any type of MOUD. Endorsement of attitudinal, financial, and institutional barriers to buprenorphine were similar among high and low MOUD reach programs. The most frequently endorsed government actions suggested to increase use of buprenorphine were facilitating access to long-acting buprenorphine (n = 95, 96 %), education and stigma reduction for clients and families (n = 95, 95 %), and financial assistance to clients to pay for medications (n = 90, 90 %).
Although non-OTP specialty substance use programs often offer clients access to MOUD, including buprenorphine, most OUD clients do not actually receive MOUD. Buprenorphine uptake in these settings may require increased financial support for programs and clients, more robust education and training for providers, and efforts to reduce the stigma associated with medication among clients and their families.
阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物,包括丁丙诺啡,可降低阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的过量风险并改善其预后。然而,从历史上看,大多数非阿片类药物治疗项目(非 OTP)专业药物使用治疗项目并未提供丁丙诺啡。了解在专业药物使用治疗环境中提供丁丙诺啡的障碍对于扩大丁丙诺啡的可及性至关重要。本研究旨在探讨影响在获得州许可的非 OTP 专业药物使用治疗项目中患者接受丁丙诺啡治疗的项目层面的态度、财务和监管因素。
我们调查了新泽西州获得州许可的非 OTP 专业药物使用治疗项目的领导层,了解组织特征,包括现场和场外提供的药物以及接受任何类型 MOUD 的 OUD 患者的比例,以及对丁丙诺啡的感知态度、财务和监管障碍和促进因素。该研究估计了障碍的流行率,并比较了高 MOUD 覆盖率(n=36,35%)和低 MOUD 覆盖率(n=66,65%)的项目。
大多数参与的组织提供至少一种现场或场外的 MOUD 类型(n=80,78%)。然而,71%的组织表示,他们的 OUD 患者中只有不到四分之一的人使用任何类型的 MOUD。高 MOUD 覆盖率和低 MOUD 覆盖率项目对丁丙诺啡的态度、财务和机构障碍的认可相似。最常被认可的增加丁丙诺啡使用的政府行动建议包括促进长效丁丙诺啡的使用(n=95,96%)、为患者及其家属提供教育和减少污名化(n=95,95%),以及为患者支付药物费用提供经济援助(n=90,90%)。
尽管非 OTP 专业药物使用治疗项目通常为患者提供包括丁丙诺啡在内的 MOUD,但大多数 OUD 患者实际上并未接受 MOUD。在这些环境中采用丁丙诺啡可能需要为项目和患者提供更多的财务支持,为提供者提供更强大的教育和培训,并努力减少患者及其家属对药物的污名化。