Welch W D, Layman M A, Chiles L, Ragsdale R, Kutscher E, Southern P M
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):387-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.387-390.1985.
The susceptibilities of 350 gram-positive cocci and 638 gram-negative bacilli to various antimicrobial agents were compared by using the Micro-Media system (MMS) (Fox Panel) (Micro-Media Systems, Inc., Potomac, Md.) and a standard agar dilution procedure. Major discrepancies occurred with enterococci, among which 48 of 53 isolates (91%) were found to be resistant to penicillin G by agar dilution and reported as susceptible by the MMS. Other large discrepancies occurred with Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus, among which more than 40% of the isolates were judged to be resistant to ampicillin by agar dilution and susceptible by the MMS. In terms of overall agreement in interpretation of MICs by the two systems, an agreement of greater than 84% was seen for both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms when ampicillin and cephalothin (68 and 78% agreement for gram-positive cocci, respectively) were excluded. These disagreements in MIC interpretations may result in part from the small number of organisms tested per well (4,000 CFU) in the MMS, as compared with 10,000 CFU per test in the agar dilution method.
使用微量培养基系统(MMS)(福克斯平板)(微量培养基系统公司,马里兰州波托马克)和标准琼脂稀释法,比较了350株革兰氏阳性球菌和638株革兰氏阴性杆菌对各种抗菌剂的敏感性。肠球菌出现了主要差异,其中53株分离株中有48株(91%)经琼脂稀释法检测对青霉素G耐药,但MMS报告为敏感。金黄色葡萄球菌和醋酸钙不动杆菌反硝化亚种也出现了其他较大差异,其中超过40%的分离株经琼脂稀释法判断对氨苄西林耐药,但MMS检测为敏感。就两种系统对最低抑菌浓度(MIC)解释的总体一致性而言,当排除氨苄西林和头孢噻吩(革兰氏阳性球菌的一致性分别为68%和78%)时,革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌的一致性均超过84%。MIC解释中的这些差异可能部分是由于MMS中每孔测试的菌数较少(4000 CFU),而琼脂稀释法每次测试为10000 CFU。