Ramezanzade Tabriz Elahe, Sadeghi Masoumeh, Tavana Ensieh, Heidarian Miri Hamid, Heshmati Nabavi Fatemeh
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 6;10(6):e27347. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27347. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
Self-confidence is a key element in successfully promoting achievement strivings among the healthcare workforce. Targeted interventions can strengthen this characteristic in nursing students, thus improving the quality of hospital services.
We evaluated the effect of educational interventions on boosting self-confidence in nursing students using systematic review and meta-analysis.
A comprehensive search was used to screen the related studies in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Peer-reviewed literature in English until June 2023 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials, either non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) or randomized (RCTs). Studies were assessed for methodological quality by the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool for RCTs (RoB 2.0) and quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. The main outcome was the self-confidence score of nursing students because of educational methods or intervention/s. Using the inverse variance weights method, a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) estimate with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess conceptual heterogeneity using Stata.
Twenty-two studies were selected involving 1758 participants and 940 cases of nursing students in the intervention group on boosting self-confidence (Fourteen Randomized controlled trials, Five Quasi-experimental, and three Before-After studies). The post-intervention self-confidence results in the nursing student's intervention group were significantly greater (SMD) (SMD for Controlled experimental design = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.14-0.89), (SMD for Quasi-experimental = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.33-0.41), (SMD for Before-After (Pre-Post) = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.85-3.63). The random-effect meta-analysis of 22 interventional studies determined that educational interventions are significantly associated with the improving self-confidence of nursing students. The intervention showed a moderate impact on the research units, according to Cohen's d results. Also, the results of simulation learning intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.03-0.81) showed a significant relationship between intervention and outcome in studies.
Analysis of our findings revealed the successful impact of most interventional approaches in boosting self-confidence, especially in the long term. It can be concluded that self-confidence is a multifactorial concept that can be improved by using targeted combination intervention strategies.
自信是成功促进医护人员追求卓越成就的关键因素。有针对性的干预措施可以增强护理专业学生的这一特质,从而提高医院服务质量。
我们通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估教育干预对提高护理专业学生自信心的效果。
采用全面检索的方法,在Scopus、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和PsycINFO中筛选相关研究。回顾了截至2023年6月的英文同行评审文献。纳入标准为对照试验,包括非随机干预研究(NRSI)或随机对照试验(RCT)。采用Cochrane非随机干预研究偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-I)和Cochrane随机对照试验“偏倚风险”工具(RoB 2.0)以及无对照组的前后(干预前-干预后)研究质量评估工具对研究进行方法学质量评估。主要结果是由于教育方法或干预措施导致的护理专业学生自信心得分。使用逆方差权重法,确定合并标准化均数差(SMD)估计值及相应的95%置信区间(CI)。使用Stata进行随机效应荟萃分析以评估概念异质性。
共纳入22项研究,涉及1758名参与者,其中干预组有940例护理专业学生参与提高自信心的研究(14项随机对照试验、5项准实验和3项前后研究)。干预组护理专业学生干预后的自信心结果显著更高(SMD)(对照实验设计的SMD = 0.51;95% CI = 0.14 - 0.89),(准实验的SMD = 0.04;95% CI = -0.33 - 0.41),(前后(干预前-干预后)研究的SMD = 2.74;95% CI = 1.85 - 3.63)。对22项干预性研究进行的随机效应荟萃分析确定,教育干预与护理专业学生自信心的提高显著相关。根据科恩d值结果,干预对研究单位有中等影响。此外,模拟学习干预的结果(SMD = 0.42;95% CI = 0.03 - 0.81)表明干预与研究中的结果之间存在显著关系。
对我们研究结果的分析表明,大多数干预方法在提高自信心方面取得了成功,尤其是从长期来看。可以得出结论,自信是一个多因素概念,可以通过使用有针对性的组合干预策略来提高。