• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较肌筋膜疼痛综合征中干针与缺血性压迫方法的疗效:一项随机试验。

COMPARISON THE EFFICACY OF DRY NEEDLING AND ISCHEMIC COMPRESSION METHODS IN MIYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL.

机构信息

1Istanbul Kent University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Physical therapy and rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey.

2Lokman Hekim University, Faculty of Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Georgian Med News. 2024 Jan(346):27-32.

PMID:38501617
Abstract

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common in the musculoskeletal disease. Dry needling techniques and ischemic compression are the most common applications. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dry needling and ischemic compression methods on pain, cervical range of motion and disability in myofascial pain syndrome. This is a randomized, controlled study. 98 patients with MPS were randomly assigned into three groups. Group1 received dry needling (n=33), group 2 (n=33) received ischemic compression and group 3 (n=32) received combined with dry needling and ischemic compression inventions. Additionally, all patients were given neck exercise programs including isotonic, isometric, and stretching. The severity of the pain was measured by visual analog scale (VAS). The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and cervical range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Disability was assessed by the Neck Pain Disability Scale. All assessments were performed before the treatment and one month and three months after the treatment. There were statistically significant improvements in VAS, PPT, cervical ROM, and disability scores after one and three months in all groups compared to pre-treatment results (p<0.05). After three months of follow-up, statistically significant differences were observed in all parameters between the groups (p<0.05) except cervical ROM (p>0.05). Myofascial pain syndrome in patients with ischemic compression and dry needling effective treatment methods are shown separately in our study to be more effective when used together.

摘要

肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病。干针技术和缺血性压迫是最常见的应用方法。我们旨在比较干针和缺血性压迫方法对肌筋膜疼痛综合征疼痛、颈椎活动范围和残疾的疗效。这是一项随机对照研究。98 例 MPS 患者随机分为三组。第 1 组接受干针治疗(n=33),第 2 组(n=33)接受缺血性压迫治疗,第 3 组(n=32)接受干针和缺血性压迫联合治疗。此外,所有患者均接受颈部运动方案,包括等张、等长和伸展运动。疼痛严重程度采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量。压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和颈椎活动范围(ROM)也被记录下来。残疾程度通过颈部疼痛残疾量表进行评估。所有评估均在治疗前和治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月进行。与治疗前相比,所有组在治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时 VAS、PPT、颈椎 ROM 和残疾评分均有统计学显著改善(p<0.05)。在 3 个月的随访中,各组之间除颈椎 ROM 外(p>0.05),所有参数均存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。我们的研究分别显示,缺血性压迫和干针治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者的有效治疗方法,联合使用时效果更为显著。

相似文献

1
COMPARISON THE EFFICACY OF DRY NEEDLING AND ISCHEMIC COMPRESSION METHODS IN MIYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL.比较肌筋膜疼痛综合征中干针与缺血性压迫方法的疗效:一项随机试验。
Georgian Med News. 2024 Jan(346):27-32.
2
Improvement in clinical outcomes after dry needling versus myofascial release on pain pressure thresholds, quality of life, fatigue, pain intensity, quality of sleep, anxiety, and depression in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.干针与肌筋膜松解治疗纤维肌痛综合征患者的疼痛压痛阈值、生活质量、疲劳、疼痛强度、睡眠质量、焦虑和抑郁的临床结局改善比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2235-2246. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1461259. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
Effectiveness of Dry Needling with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation of High Frequency Versus Low Frequency in Patients with Myofascial Neck Pain.高频与低频经皮电神经刺激干针治疗肌筋膜性颈痛的疗效比较。
Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):135-143.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of dry needling and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled study.比较干针与高强度激光治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效:一项随机单盲对照研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 20;38(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03687-w.
5
Efficacy of dry needling as an adjunct to manual therapy for patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomised clinical trial.干针疗法作为慢性机械性颈痛患者手法治疗的辅助手段的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Acupunct Med. 2020 Aug;38(4):244-254. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2018-011682. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
6
Benefits of dry needling of myofascial trigger points on autonomic function and photoelectric plethysmography in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.肌筋膜触发点干针治疗对纤维肌痛综合征患者自主神经功能和光电体积描记术的影响。
Acupunct Med. 2020 Jun;38(3):140-149. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2017-011504. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
Comparison of miniscalpel-needle release, acupuncture needling, and stretching exercise to trigger point in myofascial pain syndrome.肌筋膜疼痛综合征中小针刀松解、针刺与伸展运动治疗扳机点的比较。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):251-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b8cdc8.
8
Effectiveness of ischemic compression on myofascial trigger points in relieving neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.缺血性压迫对缓解颈痛肌筋膜触发点的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(4):783-798. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220045.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Inactivation of Trigger Points Combined with Muscle Fascia Stripping by Liquid Knife in Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia Complicated with Abdominal Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective and Controlled Clinical Study.超声引导下扳机点灭活联合液体刀肌筋膜松解术治疗带状疱疹后神经痛合并腹型肌筋膜疼痛综合征的前瞻性对照临床研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 May 17;2020:4298509. doi: 10.1155/2020/4298509. eCollection 2020.
10
Treating myofascial pain with dry needling: a systematic review for the best evidence-based practices in low back pain.用干针治疗肌筋膜疼痛:低腰痛最佳循证实践的系统评价。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 Dec;81(12):1169-1178. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777731. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Plantar pressures and stabilometry effects of ischemic compression in Flexor digitorum brevis muscle Myofascial Trigger Point: A prepost study.趾短屈肌肌筋膜触发点缺血性按压的足底压力及稳定测量效应:一项前后对照研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329734. eCollection 2025.
2
A Review of the Application of Myofascial Release Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases.肌筋膜松解疗法在疾病治疗中的应用综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Sep 26;17:4507-4517. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S481706. eCollection 2024.