Robb S S
Nurs Res. 1985 Sep-Oct;34(5):278-82.
This study considered the problem of verifying the amount and frequency of incontinent urine loss in an outpatient population. The sample consisted of elderly male community-dwelling veterans who experienced urinary incontinence. Two amount tests (60-minute and 3-day) were completed by 46 volunteer subjects and 7-day frequency records were kept by an additional 44 volunteers. Results indicated that 60-minute and 3-day absorbent pad tests for amount of urine loss classified 59% (n = 27) of the subjects the same way (normal or abnormal). Thus, the shorter test appears useful as a screening test and offers advantages of lower cost and more accurate reporting. If abnormal urine loss is not identified with the short test, the long test should be used to detect infrequent episodes. Three-day tests for incontinence frequency classified 86% (n = 28) of subjects the same as 4-day tests. Therefore, a 3-day test appears adequate to determine the number and pattern of incontinent episodes as well as associations with relevant events such as activity levels and fluid intake.
本研究探讨了在门诊人群中验证尿失禁尿量及频率的问题。样本包括患有尿失禁的老年男性社区退伍军人。46名志愿者完成了两项尿量测试(60分钟测试和3天测试),另外44名志愿者记录了7天的频率。结果表明,60分钟和3天的尿失禁尿量吸收垫测试对59%(n = 27)的受试者给出了相同分类结果(正常或异常)。因此,较短的测试似乎可用作筛查测试,具有成本较低和报告更准确的优势。如果短测试未发现异常尿量,应使用长测试来检测不频繁发作的情况。尿失禁频率的3天测试与4天测试对86%(n = 28)的受试者给出了相同分类结果。因此,3天测试似乎足以确定尿失禁发作的次数和模式,以及与活动水平和液体摄入量等相关事件的关联。