Varghese Sajit, Abraham Lissa
General Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Center, Thiruvalla, IND.
Emergency Medicine, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Center, Thiruvalla, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 18;16(2):e54397. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54397. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Conventional bedside teaching (CBT) is an integral and classical method for imparting clinical skills to undergraduates in medical schools. It is a traditionally successful approach, especially when it comes to imparting patient-doctor relationship skills and knowledge on clinical management. Peyton's four-step approach (PFSA) is one of the newer structured instructional approaches for teaching-learning, especially for imparting procedural and complex psychomotor skills. The present study compares the application of PFSA in teaching complex systemic examination skills to the CBT technique in teaching the same skill to MBBS students. The impact of the acquisition of this examination skill was assessed statistically to compare PFSA and CBT methodologies.
The target population was MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) students; for this study, the phase II MBBS students were considered as the study population since they were relatively naïve to clinical bedside examination skills. Students were allotted groups and they were taught clinical skills through CBT and PFSA separately. Using the OpenEpi toolkit Version 3 open-source sample size calculator for comparing two means, the sample size was 30 students in each group. The students were assessed for their competency and were also made to fill out a feedback questionnaire to compare the two methods of education dispensing. Results: The results of this study showed that PFSA is definitely suitable for teaching clinical examination skills. The acquisition of skills was found non-inferior to CBT while the retention of these skills was found to be equally good or even superior with PFSA than with CBT. Conclusion: PFSA has already been proven to be a good teaching method for the acquisition of complex procedural skills. This study expands the role of PFSA in teaching clinical bedside examination skills to medical students. Further large-scale studies may clarify the learning impact and outcomes of PFSA in clinical bedside teaching.
传统床边教学(CBT)是医学院校向本科生传授临床技能不可或缺的经典方法。这是一种传统上成功的方法,特别是在传授医患关系技能和临床管理知识方面。佩顿四步法(PFSA)是一种较新的结构化教学方法,尤其适用于传授程序性和复杂的心理运动技能。本研究比较了PFSA在教授复杂系统检查技能方面的应用与CBT技术在向MBBS学生教授相同技能方面的应用。对获得该检查技能的影响进行了统计学评估,以比较PFSA和CBT方法。
目标人群为MBBS(医学学士和外科学士)学生;在本研究中,将II期MBBS学生视为研究人群,因为他们对临床床边检查技能相对缺乏经验。将学生分成小组,分别通过CBT和PFSA教授他们临床技能。使用OpenEpi工具包3版本的开源样本量计算器来比较两个均值,每组样本量为30名学生。对学生的能力进行评估,并让他们填写一份反馈问卷,以比较两种教学方法。结果:本研究结果表明,PFSA绝对适合教授临床检查技能。发现技能的获得不低于CBT,而PFSA对这些技能的保留与CBT一样好甚至更好。结论:PFSA已被证明是一种获得复杂程序性技能的良好教学方法。本研究扩展了PFSA在向医学生教授临床床边检查技能方面的作用。进一步的大规模研究可能会阐明PFSA在临床床边教学中的学习影响和结果。