Suppr超能文献

作物生产中用有机基质替代无机肥料的利弊:一项全球荟萃分析。

Benefits and trade-offs of replacing inorganic fertilizer by organic substrate in crop production: A global meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xiya, Liu Mengjiao, Ciampitti Ignacio A, Cui Jiwen, Fang Kangrui, Zhao Shicheng, He Ping, Zhou Wei

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 100081, China; State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.

Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 15;925:171781. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171781. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

Abstract

Replacing inorganic fertilizer with organic substrate contributes to sustainable agricultural production capacity. However, the effects of organic substitution regimes (OSR) on global crop productivity, soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) losses and biofertility as function of environmental variables have not been systematically quantified. Here, we have conducted a meta-analysis of these effects using field data (211 papers with 852 observations) collected around the world. Results indicated that OSR increased crop productivity (3.04 %) and soil biofertility (soil qMBC, qMBN, microbial richness, Shannon and functionality by 11.4 %, 21.1 %, 10.2 %, 3.95 %, and 38.5 %, respectively), and reduced soil N losses (NO emissions, NH volatilization and soil N leaching by 26.5 %, 26.1 %, and 33.8 %, respectively), but increased CO emissions (19.4 %), and paddy fields CH emissions (41.2 %). N rate was an important factor influencing crop productivity and soil biofertility response to OSR, and crop productivity and soil biofertility had a greater positive response at moderate substitution rates in acid soil and long-term trials, but full substitution significantly decreased crop yield. Furthermore, the increase in soil biofertility and crop yield saturated in ~10-14 and ~ 22 years after organic substrate input. The emissions of CO, CH, and NO significantly increased with increasing substitution rates, while the opposite was true for N leaching. The NH volatilization response to OSR presented a positive effect in acidic and coarse texture soil. OSR was more beneficial in mitigating soil C and N loss response (except CO emissions) in uplands compared to paddy fields. Therefore, implementation of OSR requires site-specific strategies to better achieve a balance between increasing crop production and reducing environmental benefits. Given that the OSR improvement varies depending on environmental variables, we propose a predictive model to initially assess the potential for OSR improvement. This study will provide scientific guidance on the reasonable application of organic substrate in agroecosystems.

摘要

用有机基质替代无机肥料有助于提高农业可持续生产能力。然而,作为环境变量的函数,有机替代制度(OSR)对全球作物生产力、土壤碳(C)和氮(N)损失以及生物肥力的影响尚未得到系统量化。在此,我们利用在世界各地收集的田间数据(211篇论文,852个观测值)对这些影响进行了荟萃分析。结果表明,OSR提高了作物生产力(3.04%)和土壤生物肥力(土壤微生物生物量碳、微生物生物量氮、微生物丰富度、香农指数和功能分别提高了11.4%、21.1%、10.2%、3.95%和38.5%),减少了土壤氮损失(一氧化氮排放、氨挥发和土壤氮淋失分别减少了26.5%、26.1%和33.8%),但增加了二氧化碳排放(19.4%)和稻田甲烷排放(41.2%)。施氮量是影响作物生产力和土壤生物肥力对OSR响应的重要因素,在酸性土壤和长期试验中,中等替代率下作物生产力和土壤生物肥力有更大的正向响应,但完全替代显著降低作物产量。此外,有机基质输入后约10 - 14年和约22年,土壤生物肥力和作物产量的增加趋于饱和。二氧化碳、甲烷和一氧化氮的排放随着替代率的增加而显著增加,而氮淋失则相反。氨挥发对OSR的响应在酸性和质地粗糙的土壤中呈正向效应。与稻田相比,OSR在减轻旱地土壤碳和氮损失响应(二氧化碳排放除外)方面更有益。因此,实施OSR需要因地制宜的策略,以更好地实现增加作物产量和减少环境影响之间的平衡。鉴于OSR的改善因环境变量而异,我们提出了一个预测模型,以初步评估OSR改善的潜力。本研究将为有机基质在农业生态系统中的合理应用提供科学指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验