Suppr超能文献

基于迷你临床演练评估的中国硕士护理学生临床能力评估工具的开发:德尔菲法研究。

Development of a tool for assessing the clinical competency of Chinese master's nursing students based on the mini-CEX: a Delphi method study.

机构信息

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e078719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078719.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a scientific and systematic competency evaluation tool for master of nursing specialists (MNS) and to provide a reference for the training, assessment and competency evaluation of MNS.

METHODS

A first draft of the indicators for assessing MNS core competencies was developed on the basis of published research and group discussions. Between June and December 2020, the indicators were revised using two rounds of the Delphi expert consultation method, with questionnaires completed by 16 experts from five provinces in China.

RESULTS

The valid retrieval rate of the two questionnaires was 100.00%, and the coefficient of expert authority was 0.931. The Kendall's concordance coefficients of the two rounds of questionnaires were 0.136 (p<0.05) and 0.147 (p<0.05), respectively. Consensus was reached on the seven dimensions and 52 items of the MNS competency assessment instrument. The instrument dimensions included nurse‒patient communication (9 items), health assessment (7 items), clinical decision-making (8 items), operational skills (7 items), health promotion (6 items), humanistic care (9 items) and organisational effectiveness (6 items).

CONCLUSIONS

The MNS competency assessment tool constructed in this study is focused and highly credible. The findings can be used as a guide for the training, assessment and competence evaluation of MNS in the future.

摘要

目的

构建科学、系统的护理硕士专业学位研究生核心能力评价指标体系,为护理硕士专业学位研究生的培养、考核及能力评价提供参考。

方法

基于文献研究和小组讨论,初步拟定护理硕士专业学位研究生核心能力评价指标。于 2020 年 6 月至 12 月,采用两轮 Delphi 专家咨询法对指标进行修订,共选取中国 5 个省份的 16 名专家进行两轮问卷调查。

结果

两轮问卷的有效回收率均为 100.00%,专家权威系数为 0.931。两轮问卷专家协调系数分别为 0.136(P<0.05)和 0.147(P<0.05)。最终形成包括护士-患者沟通(9 项)、健康评估(7 项)、临床决策(8 项)、操作技能(7 项)、健康促进(6 项)、人文关怀(9 项)和组织效能(6 项)7 个维度 52 个条目的护理硕士专业学位研究生核心能力评价工具。

结论

本研究构建的护理硕士专业学位研究生核心能力评价工具针对性强,可信度高,可为未来护理硕士专业学位研究生的培养、考核及能力评价提供参考。

相似文献

2
3
Development of the core competency-based entrustable professional activities for Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) graduates in China.
Med Teach. 2024 Oct;46(10):1328-1336. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2308074. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
7
Competency model for dentists in China: Results of a Delphi study.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194411. eCollection 2018.
8
Developing core competencies for clinical nurse educators: An e-Delphi-study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105217. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
9

本文引用的文献

1
A Pilot Study of Modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX) in Rotation Students in the Department of Endocrinology.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Jul 9;15:2031-2038. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S372253. eCollection 2022.
3
5
Exploring the foundation programme trainees' experience of CEX assessments.
Educ Prim Care. 2019 May;30(3):176-177. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1566873. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
6
Methodology Update: Delphi Studies.
Nurs Res. 2018 Sep/Oct;67(5):404-410. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000297.
7
Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation.
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 23;7(2):e013659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013659.
8
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
The Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale: Psychometric testing in Norwegian long term and home care contexts.
BMC Nurs. 2015 Nov 16;14:59. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0109-3. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验