• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共物品博弈中的方差、规范与合作行为。

Variance, norms and cooperative behavior in public goods games.

作者信息

Wang Guangrong, Li Jianbiao, Wang Wenhua, Wang Yue, Wang Jiafeng

机构信息

Neural Decision Science Laboratory, School of Economics and Management, Weifang University, Weifang, China.

School of Economics, Institute for Study of Brain-like Economics, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 6;15:1277707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1277707. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1277707
PMID:38510307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10953686/
Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the variance of others' contributions, social norms (empirical and normative expectations), and cooperative behavior using a classic linear public goods game. The following results are observed. First, the variance of a participant's group members' contributions had a negative impact on their contributions, empirical expectations, and normative expectations. Second, deviations from the mean, whether negative or positive, were deemed less socially appropriate. Third, while there was a strong relationship between variance, social norms, and cooperative behavior, the mediating effect of social norms was found to be insignificant. Finally, there were some notable findings regarding behavior type. Although free riders and cooperators exhibited distinct behavioral patterns, their normative expectations were similar. Free riders expected others to cooperate, but their empirical expectations were significantly lower than cooperators' expectations, which were aligned with their actual contributions. These findings contribute to research on the relationship between distribution heterogeneity, social norms and cooperative behavior. Furthermore, these findings provide valuable insights into management practices.

摘要

本研究使用经典的线性公共物品博弈来考察他人贡献的方差、社会规范(经验性和规范性期望)与合作行为之间的关系。观察到以下结果。首先,参与者所在组内成员贡献的方差对其自身的贡献、经验性期望和规范性期望产生了负面影响。其次,与均值的偏差,无论是负向还是正向,都被认为在社会层面上不太合适。第三,虽然方差、社会规范和合作行为之间存在很强的关系,但社会规范的中介作用被发现不显著。最后,关于行为类型有一些值得注意的发现。尽管搭便车者和合作者表现出不同的行为模式,但他们的规范性期望是相似的。搭便车者期望他人合作,但其经验性期望显著低于合作者的期望,而合作者的期望与他们的实际贡献相符。这些发现有助于对分配异质性、社会规范和合作行为之间关系的研究。此外,这些发现为管理实践提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/30e90d9dd95d/fpsyg-15-1277707-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/ee8043e1e81b/fpsyg-15-1277707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/9181c9152061/fpsyg-15-1277707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/18d2b150d62c/fpsyg-15-1277707-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/121652c9123b/fpsyg-15-1277707-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/c15fffea0b3c/fpsyg-15-1277707-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/6654d672bcbd/fpsyg-15-1277707-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/30e90d9dd95d/fpsyg-15-1277707-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/ee8043e1e81b/fpsyg-15-1277707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/9181c9152061/fpsyg-15-1277707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/18d2b150d62c/fpsyg-15-1277707-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/121652c9123b/fpsyg-15-1277707-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/c15fffea0b3c/fpsyg-15-1277707-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/6654d672bcbd/fpsyg-15-1277707-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce6/10953686/30e90d9dd95d/fpsyg-15-1277707-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Variance, norms and cooperative behavior in public goods games.公共物品博弈中的方差、规范与合作行为。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 6;15:1277707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1277707. eCollection 2024.
2
Co-evolution of conditional cooperation and social norm.条件合作与社会规范的共同进化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):16625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43918-w.
3
Group-size diversity in public goods games.公共物品博弈中的群体规模多样性。
Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):623-636. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01504.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
4
Neural traits characterize unconditional cooperators, conditional cooperators, and noncooperators in group-based cooperation.神经特征将基于群体合作的无条件合作者、有条件合作者和非合作者区分开来。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 15;40(15):4508-4517. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24717. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Perceived legitimacy of normative expectations motivates compliance with social norms when nobody is watching.当无人监督时,规范性期望的感知合法性会促使人们遵守社会规范。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 6;6:1413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01413. eCollection 2015.
6
The signaling role of feedback in the repeated public goods game: Experimental evidence from the laboratory.反馈在重复公共物品博弈中的信号作用:来自实验室的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299196. eCollection 2024.
7
Public goods games on adaptive coevolutionary networks.适应性协同进化网络上的公共物品博弈
Chaos. 2017 Jul;27(7):073107. doi: 10.1063/1.4991679.
8
Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games.困惑无法解释公共物品博弈中的合作行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2310109121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310109121. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Replicator dynamics in public goods games with reward funds.带有奖励基金的公共物品博弈中的复制者动态。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Oct 21;287:109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of public goods games with diverse contributions in finite populations.有限种群中具有不同贡献的公共物品博弈的进化动力学
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 May;81(5 Pt 2):056103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056103. Epub 2010 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Reputation and reciprocity.声誉和互惠。
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Sep;46:8-45. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 10.
2
Neuro-Computational Foundations of Moral Preferences.道德偏好的神经计算基础
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Sep 11;17(3):253-65. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab100.
3
Mathematical foundations of moral preferences.道德偏好的数学基础。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0880. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Framing context effects with reference points.用参照点来构建语境效应。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104334. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Normative foundations of human cooperation.人类合作的规范基础。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):458-468. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0385-5.
6
Conditioning on What? Heterogeneous Contributions and Conditional Cooperation.以什么为条件?异质性贡献与条件性合作。
J Behav Exp Econ. 2015 Apr;55:48-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
Within-subject mediation analysis for experimental data in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.认知心理学和神经科学实验数据的个体内中介分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2125-2143. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0980-9.
8
Reciprocity and the Tragedies of Maintaining and Providing the Commons.互惠与维护和提供公共资源的悲剧
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):650-656. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0191-5. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
9
Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments.公共物品实验中的条件性合作与混淆
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 2;113(5):1291-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509740113. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
Experimental, cultural, and neural evidence of deliberate prosociality.刻意亲社会性的实验、文化和神经证据。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;17(3):106-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 12.