• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红色实线:床边脑血管反应性终末丧失模式。

Red solid line: Patterns of terminal loss of cerebrovascular reactivity at the bedside.

作者信息

Beqiri Erta, Czosnyka Marek, Placek Michal M, Cucciolini Giada, Motroni Virginia, Smith Claudia A, Hutchinson Peter, Smielewski Peter

机构信息

Brain Physics Laboratory Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK.

Neurosurgery Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 27;4:102760. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102760. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102760
PMID:38510604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10951796/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Continuous monitoring of the pressure reactivity index (PRx) provides an estimation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) at the bedside in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Visualising the time-trend of PRx with a risk bar chart in ICM + software at the bedside allows for better real-time interpretability of the autoregulation status. When PRx>0.3 is sustained for long periods, typically of at least half an hour, the bar shows a pattern called "red solid line" (RSL). RSL was previously described to precede refractory intracranial hypertension and brain death.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We aimed to describe pathophysiological changes in measured signals/parameters during RSL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observation of time-trends of PRx, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, brain oxygenation and compensatory reserve of TBI patients with RSL.

RESULTS

Three pathophysiological patterns were identified: RSL precedes intracranial hypertension, RSL is preceded by intracranial hypertension, or RSL is preceded by brain hypoperfusion. In all cases, RSL was followed by death and the RSL onset was between 1 h and 1 day before the terminal event.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

RSL precedes death in intensive care and could represent a marker for terminal clinical deterioration in TBI patients. These findings warrant further investigations in larger cohorts to characterise pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the RSL pattern and whether RSL has a significant relationship with outcome after TBI.

摘要

引言

连续监测压力反应性指数(PRx)可在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者床边评估动态脑自动调节(CA)。在床边使用ICM +软件中的风险条形图可视化PRx的时间趋势,有助于更好地实时解读自动调节状态。当PRx>0.3持续较长时间,通常至少半小时时,条形图会显示一种称为“红色实线”(RSL)的模式。先前曾描述RSL先于难治性颅内高压和脑死亡出现。

研究问题

我们旨在描述RSL期间测量信号/参数的病理生理变化。

材料与方法

观察出现RSL的TBI患者的PRx、颅内压、脑灌注压、脑氧合和代偿储备的时间趋势。

结果

确定了三种病理生理模式:RSL先于颅内高压出现、RSL之前存在颅内高压、或RSL之前存在脑灌注不足。在所有病例中,RSL之后均出现死亡,且RSL发作发生在终末事件前1小时至1天之间。

讨论与结论

RSL在重症监护中先于死亡出现,可能代表TBI患者终末临床恶化的标志物。这些发现值得在更大队列中进一步研究,以明确RSL模式背后的病理生理机制,以及RSL与TBI后结局是否存在显著关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/a920aea4774c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/6208722452ce/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/d8fe44b59b29/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/36355047b559/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/a920aea4774c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/6208722452ce/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/d8fe44b59b29/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/36355047b559/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91e7/10951796/a920aea4774c/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Red solid line: Patterns of terminal loss of cerebrovascular reactivity at the bedside.红色实线:床边脑血管反应性终末丧失模式。
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 27;4:102760. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102760. eCollection 2024.
2
"Solid Red Line": An Observational Study on Death from Refractory Intracranial Hypertension.“实线”:难治性颅内高压致死的一项观察性研究
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:113-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_22.
3
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
4
Inducing oscillations in positive end-expiratory pressure improves assessment of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with traumatic brain injury.在正呼气末压下诱导震荡可改善颅脑损伤患者脑血管压力反应性的评估。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Sep 1;133(3):585-592. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00199.2022. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Observations on the Cerebral Effects of Refractory Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后难治性颅内高压的脑观察。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Apr;32(2):437-447. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00748-x.
6
The impact of hypertonic saline on cerebrovascular reactivity and compensatory reserve in traumatic brain injury: an exploratory analysis.高渗盐水对创伤性脑损伤患者脑血管反应性和代偿储备能力的影响:一项探索性分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Nov;162(11):2683-2693. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04579-0. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
'Long' pressure reactivity index (L-PRx) as a measure of autoregulation correlates with outcome in traumatic brain injury patients.'长时'压力反应指数(L-PRx)作为自动调节的测量指标与创伤性脑损伤患者的预后相关。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Sep;154(9):1575-81. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1423-0. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Continuous assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation after traumatic brain injury using brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity.使用脑组织氧分压反应性对创伤性脑损伤后脑血管自动调节进行连续评估。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1783-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218413.51546.9E.
9
Alternative continuous intracranial pressure-derived cerebrovascular reactivity metrics in traumatic brain injury: a scoping overview.创伤性脑损伤中替代连续颅内压衍生的脑血管反应性指标:范围概述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1647-1662. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04378-7. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Evaluation and application of ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.超低频压力反应指数在小儿创伤性脑损伤患者中的评估与应用
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):865-874. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05538-1. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlocking the potential of high-resolution multimodality neuromonitoring for traumatic brain injury management: lessons and insights from cases, events, and patterns.挖掘高分辨率多模态神经监测在创伤性脑损伤管理中的潜力:来自病例、事件及模式的经验与见解。
Crit Care. 2025 Mar 31;29(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05360-4.
2
Dynamic assessment of signal entropy for prognostication and secondary brain insult detection after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后用于预后评估和继发性脑损伤检测的信号熵动态评估
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 30;28(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05228-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The lower limit of reactivity as a potential individualised cerebral perfusion pressure target in traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI high-resolution sub-study analysis.作为创伤性脑损伤潜在个体化脑灌注压目标的反应下限:CENTER-TBI 高分辨率亚研究分析。
Crit Care. 2023 May 20;27(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04485-8.
2
Cerebral multimodality monitoring in adult neurocritical care patients with acute brain injury: A narrative review.成人急性脑损伤神经重症监护患者的脑多模态监测:一项叙述性综述。
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1071161. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1071161. eCollection 2022.
3
Differential Hemodynamic Response of Pial Arterioles Contributes to a Quadriphasic Cerebral Autoregulation Physiology.
软脑膜小动脉的差异血流动力学反应有助于形成四相性脑自动调节生理学。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 4;11(1):e022943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022943. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Losing the dogmatic view of cerebral autoregulation.摒弃脑自动调节的教条观点。
Physiol Rep. 2021 Aug;9(15):e14982. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14982.
5
Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation.人脑血流的调节:自身调节的生理学和临床意义。
Physiol Rev. 2021 Oct 1;101(4):1487-1559. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2020. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Fine Tuning of Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Neurointensive Care-Indicative Observations and Future Perspectives.神经重症监护中创伤性脑损伤管理的精细调整——指示性观察与未来展望
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:638132. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638132. eCollection 2021.
7
Recent advances in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的最新进展。
J Neurol. 2019 Nov;266(11):2878-2889. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09541-4. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
8
Twenty-Five Years of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.颅脑创伤后颅内压监测 25 年:回顾性单中心分析。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(1):E75-E82. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy468.
9
Individualizing Thresholds of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Using Estimated Limits of Autoregulation.利用估计的自动调节极限个体化脑灌注压阈值
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1464-1471. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002575.
10
Critical care management of traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的重症监护管理
Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;140:239-274. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63600-3.00014-3.