• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经重症监护中创伤性脑损伤管理的精细调整——指示性观察与未来展望

Fine Tuning of Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Neurointensive Care-Indicative Observations and Future Perspectives.

作者信息

Svedung Wettervik Teodor M, Lewén Anders, Enblad Per

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:638132. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638132. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.638132
PMID:33716941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943830/
Abstract

Neurointensive care (NIC) has contributed to great improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) by preventing, detecting, and treating secondary insults and thereby reducing secondary brain injury. Traditional NIC management has mainly focused on generally applicable escalated treatment protocols to avoid high intracranial pressure (ICP) and to keep the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) at sufficiently high levels. However, TBI is a very heterogeneous disease regarding the type of injury, age, comorbidity, secondary injury mechanisms, etc. In recent years, the introduction of multimodality monitoring, including, e.g., pressure autoregulation, brain tissue oxygenation, and cerebral energy metabolism, in addition to ICP and CPP, has increased the understanding of the complex pathophysiology and the physiological effects of treatments in this condition. In this article, we will present some potential future approaches for more individualized patient management and fine-tuning of NIC, taking advantage of multimodal monitoring to further improve outcome after severe TBI.

摘要

神经重症监护(NIC)通过预防、检测和治疗继发性损伤,从而减少继发性脑损伤,为重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的临床预后带来了显著改善。传统的NIC管理主要侧重于普遍适用的逐步升级治疗方案,以避免高颅内压(ICP)并将脑灌注压(CPP)维持在足够高的水平。然而,TBI在损伤类型、年龄、合并症、继发性损伤机制等方面是一种非常异质性的疾病。近年来,除了ICP和CPP监测外,引入多模态监测,如压力自动调节、脑组织氧合和脑能量代谢,增加了对这种情况下复杂病理生理学和治疗生理效应的理解。在本文中,我们将介绍一些未来可能的方法,利用多模态监测来进一步改善重度TBI后的预后,实现更个性化的患者管理和NIC的精细调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/c0f4ee773b15/fneur-12-638132-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/59cfc86e0fab/fneur-12-638132-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/4389287fc22f/fneur-12-638132-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/b70fbb213b88/fneur-12-638132-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/c0f4ee773b15/fneur-12-638132-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/59cfc86e0fab/fneur-12-638132-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/4389287fc22f/fneur-12-638132-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/b70fbb213b88/fneur-12-638132-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a39/7943830/c0f4ee773b15/fneur-12-638132-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Fine Tuning of Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Neurointensive Care-Indicative Observations and Future Perspectives.神经重症监护中创伤性脑损伤管理的精细调整——指示性观察与未来展望
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:638132. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638132. eCollection 2021.
2
Fine tuning of neurointensive care in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: From one-size-fits-all towards individualized care.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血神经重症监护的精准优化:从一刀切到个性化护理。
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Jan 24;18:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100160. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome.乌普萨拉创伤性脑损伤登记处介绍,用于定期监测患者特征和神经重症监护管理,包括二次损伤量化和临床转归。
Ups J Med Sci. 2013 Aug;118(3):169-80. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2013.806616.
4
Neurointensive care of traumatic brain injury in the elderly-age-specific secondary insult levels and optimal physiological levels to target need to be defined.老年创伤性脑损伤的神经重症监护——特定年龄的继发性损伤水平以及需要靶向的最佳生理水平有待确定。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jan;164(1):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05047-z. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Temporal Neurophysiological Dynamics in Traumatic Brain Injury: Role of Pressure Reactivity and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure for Predicting Outcome.创伤性脑损伤的时间神经生理动力学:压力反应和最佳脑灌注压在预测结果中的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun;36(11):1818-1827. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6157. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Brain tissue oxygenation and cerebral metabolic patterns in focal and diffuse traumatic brain injury.局灶性和弥漫性创伤性脑损伤的脑组织氧合和脑代谢模式。
Front Neurol. 2014 May 1;5:64. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00064. eCollection 2014.
8
Blood Pressure Variability and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-New Therapeutic Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury.血压变异性与最佳脑灌注压:创伤性脑损伤的新治疗靶点。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):E300-E309. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz515.
9
Intraoperative intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure for predicting surgical outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.术中颅内压和脑灌注压预测严重创伤性脑损伤的手术结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Oct;29(10):540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
Applying cerebral hypothermia and brain oxygen monitoring in treating severe traumatic brain injury.应用脑低温和脑氧监测治疗严重创伤性脑损伤。
World Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;74(6):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.06.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracranial pressure dynamics, cerebral autoregulation, and brain perfusion after decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: is there a role for invasive monitoring?恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术后的颅内压动态、脑自动调节和脑灌注:有创监测有作用吗?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 9;167(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06537-0.
2
Regional variation in traumatic brain injury patterns, management and mortality: a nationwide Swedish cohort study.创伤性脑损伤模式、治疗及死亡率的地区差异:一项瑞典全国性队列研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 8;167(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06557-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2020 Update of the Decompressive Craniectomy Recommendations.严重创伤性脑损伤管理指南:去骨瓣减压术推荐的 2020 年更新。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):427-434. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa278.
2
Arterial Oxygenation in Traumatic Brain Injury-Relation to Cerebral Energy Metabolism, Autoregulation, and Clinical Outcome.创伤性脑损伤的动脉氧合-与脑能量代谢、自动调节和临床结果的关系。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):1075-1083. doi: 10.1177/0885066620944097. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Systemic Hyperthermia in Traumatic Brain Injury-Relation to Intracranial Pressure Dynamics, Cerebral Energy Metabolism, and Clinical Outcome.
The influence of hemorrhagic shock on brain perfusion in a swine model of raised intracranial pressure.
失血性休克对颅内压升高猪模型脑灌注的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02819-5.
4
Traumatic brain injury causes early aggregation of beta-amyloid peptides and NOTCH3 reduction in vascular smooth muscle cells of leptomeningeal arteries.创伤性脑损伤导致β-淀粉样肽早期聚集,并使软脑膜动脉血管平滑肌细胞中的NOTCH3减少。
Acta Neuropathol. 2025 Jan 22;149(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00401-025-02848-9.
5
Revisiting the oxygen reactivity index in traumatic brain injury: the complementary value of combined focal and global autoregulation monitoring.重新审视创伤性脑损伤中的氧反应性指数:联合局部和整体自动调节监测的互补价值。
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 12;29(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05261-6.
6
The Therapeutic Potential of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Traumatic Brain Injury.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在创伤性脑损伤中的治疗潜力
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;17(10):1313. doi: 10.3390/ph17101313.
7
Preliminary Observations of the Loke Microdialysis in an Experimental Pig Model: Are We Ready for Continuous Monitoring of Brain Energy Metabolism?洛氏微透析在实验猪模型中的初步观察:我们是否准备好对脑能量代谢进行连续监测?
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):222-231. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02080-5. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
8
Neutralization of Interleukin 1-beta is associated with preservation of thalamic capillaries after experimental traumatic brain injury.白细胞介素1-β的中和与实验性创伤性脑损伤后丘脑毛细血管的保留有关。
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1378203. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1378203. eCollection 2024.
9
Red solid line: Patterns of terminal loss of cerebrovascular reactivity at the bedside.红色实线:床边脑血管反应性终末丧失模式。
Brain Spine. 2024 Jan 27;4:102760. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102760. eCollection 2024.
10
Should Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Significant Contusions be Treated with Different Neurointensive Care Targets?创伤性脑损伤伴大挫伤患者是否应采用不同的神经重症监护目标治疗?
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):511-522. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01954-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
颅脑创伤后全身发热与颅内压动态、脑能量代谢和临床转归的关系。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Oct 1;33(4):329-336. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000695.
4
Continuous cerebrovascular reactivity monitoring in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of advances in neurocritical care.中度/重度创伤性脑损伤中脑血管反应性的连续监测:神经重症监护进展的叙述性综述
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Apr;124(4):440-453. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.031. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Blood Pressure Variability and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-New Therapeutic Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury.血压变异性与最佳脑灌注压:创伤性脑损伤的新治疗靶点。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):E300-E309. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz515.
6
A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1783-1794. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
7
Mild Hyperventilation in Traumatic Brain Injury-Relation to Cerebral Energy Metabolism, Pressure Autoregulation, and Clinical Outcome.轻度过度通气与创伤性脑损伤的关系——与脑能量代谢、压力自动调节和临床结果的关系。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e567-e575. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.099. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.采用自动评估最佳脑灌注压方法对个体化严重创伤性脑损伤管理的可行性:COGiTATE 二期研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.
9
Cerebrovascular reactivity is not associated with therapeutic intensity in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI analysis.脑血管反应性与成人创伤性脑损伤的治疗强度无关:CENTER-TBI 分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Sep;161(9):1955-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03980-8. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Copenhagen Head Injury Ciclosporin Study: A Phase IIa Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Biomarker Study of Ciclosporin in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.哥本哈根颅脑损伤环孢素研究:环孢素治疗严重颅脑损伤患者的 IIa 期安全性、药代动力学和生物标志物研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Dec 1;36(23):3253-3263. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6369. Epub 2019 Aug 1.