Dewi Grace, Manjankattil Shijinaraj, Peichel Claire, Johnson Timothy J, Noll Sally, Cardona Carol, Kollanoor Johny Anup
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Mar 6;15:1337428. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337428. eCollection 2024.
Reducing the colonization of in turkeys is critical to mitigating the risk of its contamination at later stages of production. Given the increased susceptibility of newly hatched poults to colonization, it is crucial to implement interventions that target potential transmission routes, including drinking water. As no individual intervention explored to date is known to eliminate , the United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) recommends employing multiple hurdles to achieve a more meaningful reduction and minimize the potential emergence of resistance. Probiotics and plant-derived antimicrobials (PDAs) have demonstrated efficacy as interventions against in poultry. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the use of turkey-derived probiotics (LB; a mixture of UMNPBX2 and UMNPBX19 isolated from turkey ileum) and a PDA, cinnamaldehyde (TC), alone and in combination (CO), against Heidelberg in turkey drinking water and poults. The presence of 5% nutrient broth or cecal contents as contaminants in water resulted in Heidelberg growth. TC eliminated Heidelberg, regardless of the contaminants present. In contrast, the cecal contents led to increased survival of in the CO group. Unlike TC, LB was most effective against . Heidelberg when the nutrient broth was present, suggesting the role of secondary metabolites in its mechanism of action. In the experiments with poults, individual TC and LB supplementation reduced cecal . Heidelberg in challenged poults by 1.2- and 1.7-log colony-forming units (CFU)/g cecal contents, respectively. Their combination yielded an additive effect, reducing . Heidelberg by 2.7 log CFU/g of cecal contents compared to the control ( ≤ 0.05). However, the impact of TC and LB on the translocation of . Heidelberg to the liver was more significant than CO. TC and LB are effective preharvest interventions against . Heidelberg in poultry production. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to determine the optimum application method and its efficacy in adult turkeys.
减少火鸡体内的[细菌名称未给出]定植对于降低其在生产后期污染的风险至关重要。鉴于新孵出的雏火鸡对[细菌名称未给出]定植的易感性增加,实施针对潜在传播途径(包括饮用水)的干预措施至关重要。由于迄今为止尚未发现任何单独的干预措施能够消除[细菌名称未给出],美国农业部食品安全检验局(USDA - FSIS)建议采用多种障碍措施以实现更有意义的减少并最大限度地减少耐药性的潜在出现。益生菌和植物源抗菌剂(PDA)已证明作为家禽中对抗[细菌名称未给出]的干预措施具有功效。因此,本研究旨在调查源自火鸡的[细菌名称未给出]益生菌(LB;从火鸡回肠分离的UMNPBX2和UMNPBX19的混合物)和一种PDA肉桂醛(TC)单独使用以及联合使用(CO)对火鸡饮用水和雏火鸡中[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌的作用。水中存在5%的营养肉汤或盲肠内容物作为污染物会导致[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌生长。无论存在何种污染物,TC都能消除[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌。相比之下,盲肠内容物导致CO组中[细菌名称未给出]的存活率增加。与TC不同,当存在营养肉汤时,LB对[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌最有效,这表明次生代谢产物在其作用机制中的作用。在雏火鸡实验中,单独补充TC和LB分别使受挑战雏火鸡的盲肠[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌减少了1.2和1.7个对数菌落形成单位(CFU)/克盲肠内容物。它们的联合产生了相加效应,与对照组相比,使[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌减少了2.7 log CFU/克盲肠内容物(P≤0.05)。然而,TC和LB对[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌向肝脏转移的影响比CO更显著。TC和LB是家禽生产中对抗[细菌名称未给出]海德堡菌的有效收获前干预措施。尽管如此,仍需要进一步研究以确定最佳应用方法及其在成年火鸡中的功效。