Wang Jun-Guang, Zhong Chao, Zhang Ke-Cheng, Chen Jun-Bo
Department of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 6;14:1344050. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1344050. eCollection 2024.
To explore the impact of different imaging classifications of prostate cancer (PCa) with extracapsular extension (EPE) on positive surgical margins (PSM) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Clinical data were collected for 114 patients with stage PT3a PCa admitted to Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital from September 2019 to August 2023. Radiologists classified the EPE imaging of PCa into Type I, Type II, and Type III. A chi-square test or t-test was employed to analyze the factors related to PSM. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with PSM. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve and evaluate the diagnostic performance of our model. Clinical decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical net benefit of EPE imaging classification, biopsy grade group (GG), and combined model.
Among the 114 patients, 58 had PSM, and 56 had negative surgical margins. Multivariate analysis showed that EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were risk factors for PSM after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The areas under the curve for EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were 0.677 and 0.712, respectively. The difference in predicting PSM between EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG was not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, when used in combination, the diagnostic efficiency significantly improved, with an increase in the area under the curve to 0.795 (P<0.05). The clinical decision curve analysis revealed that the clinical net benefit of the combined model was significantly higher than that of EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG.
EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were associated with PSM after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and their combination can significantly improve the accuracy of predicting PSM.
探讨前列腺癌(PCa)伴包膜外侵犯(EPE)的不同影像学分类对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性(PSM)的影响。
收集2019年9月至2023年8月在宁波市鄞州第二医院住院的114例PT3a期PCa患者的临床资料。放射科医生将PCa的EPE影像学分为I型、II型和III型。采用卡方检验或t检验分析与PSM相关的因素。进行多因素回归分析以确定与PSM相关的因素。采用受试者操作特征曲线分析计算曲线下面积,并评估模型的诊断性能。进行临床决策曲线分析以评估EPE影像学分类、活检分级组(GG)及联合模型的临床净效益。
114例患者中,58例出现PSM,56例切缘阴性。多因素分析显示,EPE影像学分类和活检GG是腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后PSM的危险因素。EPE影像学分类和活检GG的曲线下面积分别为0.677和0.712。EPE影像学分类和活检GG在预测PSM方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,联合使用时,诊断效率显著提高,曲线下面积增加至0.795(P<0.05)。临床决策曲线分析显示,联合模型的临床净效益显著高于EPE影像学分类和活检GG。
EPE影像学分类和活检GG与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的PSM相关,二者联合可显著提高预测PSM的准确性。