• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部钝性损伤中CT扫描证实的实性器官损伤的管理评估——一项前瞻性研究。

Evaluation of management of CT scan proved solid organ injury in blunt injury abdomen-a prospective study.

作者信息

Mukharjee Sourodip, B V Dinesh, S V Bharath

机构信息

General Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Tiger Circle, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2753-2763. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02501-2. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02501-2
PMID:38512418
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma especially road traffic injury is one of the major health-related issues throughout the world, especially in developing countries like India (Mattox 2022). Solid organ injury is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The non-operative management (NOM) is being consistently followed for hemodynamically stable patients with respect to solid organ injuries. This study aims to provide an evidence base for management modalities of solid organ injuries in blunt abdominal trauma.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment modalities for solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the characteristics of blunt abdominal injury with respect to age and gender; distribution, mode of injury, most common organ injured, and severity of injury; effect of delay in getting treatment on the management outcome for patients with solid organ injury; evaluating the various modalities of treatment of CT-proven solid organ injury; incidence of complications in different modes of treatment.

METHODS

All patients aged more than 18 years and suffering from CT-proven solid organ injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma between February 2021 and September 2022 were included in this prospective observational study. Sixty-five patients were enrolled in the study after meeting the inclusion criteria. Details such as age, gender, mechanism of injury, the time between injury to first hospital contact, presenting complaints, organ and grade of injury, Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), management, and outcomes were collected using self-designed pro forma and analyzed. Different modalities of treatment were evaluated and patients undergoing operative and non-operative management were compared. Patients in whom non-operative management failed were compared with patients with successful non-operative management.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients involved were 36.8 years with a male:female ratio of 7.125:1 and the most common age group affected being between 21 and 30 years. The most common mode of injury was noted to be road traffic accidents (72.3%). The most common presenting complaints were abdominal pain (64.6%) followed by chest pain (29.2%) and vomiting (13.8%). There was no significant relationship between latent period and type of intervention or failure of non-operative management. FAST positivity rate was noted to be 92.3%. Chronic alcoholism and bronchial asthma were significant predictors for patients undergoing upfront surgery (p = 0.003 and 0.006 respectively). The presence of pelvic and spine injury was statistically significant for predicting mortality in polytrauma patients (p = 0.003). Concurrent adrenal injury was found in 24.6% of patients but was not related to failure of non-operative management or mortality. RTS significantly predicts the multitude of organ involvement (p = 0.015). The liver was the most common organ injured (60%) followed by the spleen (52.3%) and the kidney (20%). The liver and the spleen (9.2%) were noted to be the most common organ combination involved. No specific organ or organ injury combination was noted to predict failure of non-operative management or mortality. But the multitude of organ involvement was statistically significant for predicting patients undergoing upfront surgery (p = 0.011). Out of 65 patients enrolled in the study, 7 patients (10.8%) underwent immediate surgery, and 58 patients (89.2%) underwent non-operative management. Among the 68 chosen for non-operative management, 6 patients (9.2%) failed non-operative management and 52 patients (80%) had success of non-operative management. A significant drop in hemoglobin (83.3%) on day 1 (66.6%) was seen to be the commonest reason for failure of non-operative management. The spleen was noted to be the most commonly involved organ intra-operatively (61.5%) followed by the liver (30.8%). Concordance between pre-operative and intra-operative grading of organ injuries was highest for liver and kidney injuries (100%) and lowest for pancreatic injuries (0%). Requirement of blood transfusion and liver injuries were significant factors for failure of non-operative management (p = 0.012 and 0.045 respectively). The presence of pancreatic leak was significant between the non-operated patients and patients operated upfront (p = 0.003). Mortality was noted to be 10.8% (7 patients) in our study.

CONCLUSION

Solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. RTS was noted to be a good predictor for solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma. Pancreatic injuries are notorious for being under-staged on CT findings; hence, the need arises for multimodality imaging for suspected pancreatic injuries. Non-operative management is a successful modality of treatment for majority of patients suffering from multiple solid organ injuries in blunt abdominal trauma provided serial close monitoring of patient's clinical signs and hemoglobin is instituted along with the presence of an emergency surgery team.

摘要

背景

创伤尤其是道路交通伤是全球主要的健康相关问题之一,在印度等发展中国家尤为突出(Mattox,2022年)。实质性器官损伤是钝性腹部创伤患者发病和死亡的最常见原因。对于血流动力学稳定的实质性器官损伤患者,一直采用非手术治疗(NOM)。本研究旨在为钝性腹部创伤中实质性器官损伤的治疗方式提供循证依据。

目的

本研究的目的是评估钝性腹部创伤中实质性器官损伤的各种治疗方式的有效性。

目标

评估钝性腹部损伤在年龄和性别方面的特征;损伤的分布、方式、最常受损器官及损伤严重程度;治疗延迟对实质性器官损伤患者治疗结果的影响;评估CT证实的实质性器官损伤的各种治疗方式;不同治疗方式的并发症发生率。

方法

本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了2021年2月至2022年9月期间所有年龄超过18岁、经CT证实因钝性腹部创伤导致实质性器官损伤的患者。65名患者符合纳入标准后被纳入研究。使用自行设计的表格收集年龄、性别、损伤机制、受伤至首次医院就诊的时间、主诉、损伤器官及分级、修订创伤评分(RTS)、创伤评分和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)、治疗及结果等详细信息,并进行分析。评估不同的治疗方式,比较接受手术和非手术治疗的患者。将非手术治疗失败的患者与非手术治疗成功的患者进行比较。

结果

纳入患者的平均年龄为36.8岁,男女比例为7.125:1,最常受影响的年龄组为21至30岁。最常见的损伤方式为道路交通事故(72.3%)。最常见的主诉是腹痛(64.6%),其次是胸痛(29.2%)和呕吐(13.8%)。潜伏期与干预类型或非手术治疗失败之间无显著关系。床旁超声(FAST)阳性率为92.3%。慢性酒精中毒和支气管哮喘是接受早期手术患者的重要预测因素(分别为p = 0.003和0.006)。骨盆和脊柱损伤的存在对预测多发伤患者的死亡率具有统计学意义(p = 0.003)。24.6%的患者并发肾上腺损伤,但与非手术治疗失败或死亡率无关。RTS能显著预测多器官受累情况(p = 0.015)。最常受损的器官是肝脏(60%),其次是脾脏(52.3%)和肾脏(20%)。肝脏和脾脏(9.2%)是最常受累的器官组合。未发现特定器官或器官损伤组合可预测非手术治疗失败或死亡率。但多器官受累对预测接受早期手术的患者具有统计学意义(p = 0.011)。在纳入研究的65名患者中,7名患者(10.8%)接受了立即手术,58名患者(89.2%)接受了非手术治疗。在选择非手术治疗的68名患者中,6名患者(9.2%)非手术治疗失败,52名患者(80%)非手术治疗成功。术后第1天血红蛋白显著下降(83.3%)(第66.6天)是最常见的非手术治疗失败原因。术中最常受累的器官是脾脏(61.5%),其次是肝脏(30.8%)。肝损伤和肾损伤的术前与术中损伤分级一致性最高(100%),胰腺损伤最低(0%)。输血需求和肝损伤是非手术治疗失败的重要因素(分别为p = 0.012和0.045)。未手术患者与早期手术患者之间胰腺瘘的发生率存在显著差异(p = 0.003)。本研究中的死亡率为10.8%(7名患者)。

结论

钝性腹部创伤中的实质性器官损伤是发病和死亡的重要原因。RTS是钝性腹部创伤中实质性器官损伤的良好预测指标。胰腺损伤在CT检查中常常分期不足,因此对于疑似胰腺损伤需要进行多模态影像学检查。对于大多数钝性腹部创伤导致多发实质性器官损伤的患者,非手术治疗是一种成功的治疗方式,前提是对患者的临床体征和血红蛋白进行连续密切监测,并配备急诊手术团队。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of management of CT scan proved solid organ injury in blunt injury abdomen-a prospective study.腹部钝性损伤中CT扫描证实的实性器官损伤的管理评估——一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2753-2763. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02501-2. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Clinical parameters for the early detection of complications in patients with blunt hepatic and/or splenic injury undergoing non-operative management.用于检测行非手术治疗的钝性肝和/或脾损伤患者并发症的临床参数。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):847-855. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02460-8. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in a middle-income country, how does it stack up?中低收入国家的实体器官损伤非手术治疗:情况如何?
Injury. 2022 Sep;53(9):2992-2997. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.036. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma in children: a fifteen-year experience.儿童钝性腹部创伤所致孤立性实体器官损伤的非手术治疗:十五年经验
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;14(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815777.
5
Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内多个实性器官损伤的非手术治疗
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):943-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180342023.
6
Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol.钝性脾外伤的非手术治疗:一项标准化治疗方案的前瞻性评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):593-598. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0575-z. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Management of blunt liver trauma in 134 severely injured patients.134例严重创伤患者钝性肝损伤的处理
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Nonoperative treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs: a prospective study.腹部实性脏器钝性损伤的非手术治疗:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):844-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.844.
9
[Non-operative management of blunt abdominal injuries].钝性腹部损伤的非手术治疗
Chir Ital. 2007 Jan-Feb;59(1):1-15.
10
[Non-operative management of blunt hepatic trauma].钝性肝损伤的非手术治疗
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007 Jul;13(3):222-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, characteristics and treatment of concomitant injury to liver and spleen with vascular injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后肝脾伴血管损伤的发生率、特征及治疗
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14113-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-operative management for abdominal solidorgan injuries: A literature review.腹部实质脏器损伤的非手术治疗:文献回顾。
Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Sep;25(5):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Single Versus Multiple Solid Organ Injuries Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma.钝性腹部创伤后单一与多发实体器官损伤
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2689-2696. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4087-3.
3
Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤的诊断与处理
Ann Surg. 1976 Jun;183(6):672-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197606000-00009.