• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究人们为何会相信医疗保健方面的虚假信息。

Discovering why people believe disinformation about healthcare.

机构信息

Ivy College of Business, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0300497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300497. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300497
PMID:38512834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956743/
Abstract

Disinformation-false information intended to cause harm or for profit-is pervasive. While disinformation exists in several domains, one area with great potential for personal harm from disinformation is healthcare. The amount of disinformation about health issues on social media has grown dramatically over the past several years, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study described in this paper sought to determine the characteristics of multimedia social network posts that lead them to believe and potentially act on healthcare disinformation. The study was conducted in a neuroscience laboratory in early 2022. Twenty-six study participants each viewed a series of 20 either honest or dishonest social media posts, dealing with various aspects of healthcare. They were asked to determine if the posts were true or false and then to provide the reasoning behind their choices. Participant gaze was captured through eye tracking technology and investigated through "area of interest" analysis. This approach has the potential to discover the elements of disinformation that help convince the viewer a given post is true. Participants detected the true nature of the posts they were exposed to 69% of the time. Overall, the source of the post, whether its claims seemed reasonable, and the look and feel of the post were the most important reasons they cited for determining whether it was true or false. Based on the eye tracking data collected, the factors most associated with successfully detecting disinformation were the total number of fixations on key words and the total number of revisits to source information. The findings suggest the outlines of generalizations about why people believe online disinformation, suggesting a basis for the development of mid-range theory.

摘要

虚假信息(旨在造成伤害或谋取利益的虚假信息)无处不在。虽然虚假信息存在于多个领域,但在医疗保健领域,虚假信息可能会对个人造成极大的伤害。过去几年,社交媒体上有关健康问题的虚假信息数量急剧增加,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间。本文描述的研究旨在确定导致人们相信并可能采取行动的多媒体社交网络帖子的特征。这项研究是在 2022 年初在一个神经科学实验室进行的。26 名研究参与者每人观看了一系列 20 个真实或不真实的社交媒体帖子,这些帖子涉及医疗保健的各个方面。他们被要求确定帖子是真是假,然后提供他们选择的理由。参与者的注视通过眼动追踪技术进行捕获,并通过“感兴趣区域”分析进行调查。这种方法有可能发现帮助说服观看者某个帖子是真实的虚假信息元素。参与者在 69%的时间里发现了他们所接触到的帖子的真实性质。总的来说,帖子的来源、其说法是否合理以及帖子的外观和感觉是他们引用的确定帖子真假的最重要原因。基于收集到的眼动追踪数据,与成功检测虚假信息最相关的因素是对关键字的总注视次数和对来源信息的总回访次数。研究结果表明,人们相信在线虚假信息的原因可以概括为一般规律,为中程理论的发展提供了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70f/10956743/b22c1ed153a1/pone.0300497.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70f/10956743/ef273a93af70/pone.0300497.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70f/10956743/b22c1ed153a1/pone.0300497.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70f/10956743/ef273a93af70/pone.0300497.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70f/10956743/b22c1ed153a1/pone.0300497.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Discovering why people believe disinformation about healthcare.探究人们为何会相信医疗保健方面的虚假信息。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0300497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300497. eCollection 2024.
2
The Role of Social Media in Health Misinformation and Disinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bibliometric Analysis.社交媒体在 COVID-19 大流行期间健康错误信息和虚假信息中的作用:文献计量分析。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Sep 20;3:e48620. doi: 10.2196/48620.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Text mining online disinformation about antihypertensive agents ACEI/ARB and COVID-19 on Sina Weibo.在新浪微博上进行 ACEI/ARB 类降压药与 COVID-19 相关网络虚假信息的文本挖掘。
J Glob Health. 2023 Aug 18;13:06028. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06028.
5
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息?信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
6
Disinformation of text mining online about tobacco and the COVID-19 discussed on Sina Weibo.关于烟草与新冠疫情的线上文本挖掘虚假信息在新浪微博上的讨论。
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Oct 22;19:83. doi: 10.18332/tid/142776. eCollection 2021.
7
Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media.对与信仰一致的虚假信息持道德宽容态度,可能有助于解释其在社交媒体上的传播。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281777. eCollection 2023.
8
Online mis/disinformation and vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: Why we need an eHealth literacy revolution.新冠疫情时代的网络错误/虚假信息和疫苗犹豫:为什么我们需要一场电子健康素养革命。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1874218. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
What contributes to COVID-19 online disinformation among Black Canadians: a qualitative study.是什么导致加拿大黑人对 COVID-19 在线虚假信息的信任:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 May 2;11(3):E389-E396. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220197. Print 2023 May-Jun.
10
A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.针对 COVID-19 错误信息和虚假信息的数字健康干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):752-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad005.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating visual expertise in sculpture: A methodological approach using eye tracking.探究雕塑领域的视觉专业技能:一种使用眼动追踪的方法。
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Jun 30;15(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.2.5. eCollection 2022.
2
The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情期间假新闻在社交媒体上的影响及其对健康的作用:一项系统综述
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2021 Oct 9:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z.
3
Development of the 12-Item Social Media Disinformation Scale and its Association With Social Media Addiction and Mental Health Related to COVID-19 in Tunisia: Survey-Based Pilot Case Study.
12项社交媒体虚假信息量表的编制及其与突尼斯社交媒体成瘾和与COVID-19相关的心理健康的关联:基于调查的试点案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 9;5(6):e27280. doi: 10.2196/27280.
4
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
5
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation.为什么人们会在网上传播虚假信息?信息和观众特征对自我报告的社交媒体虚假信息分享可能性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239666. eCollection 2020.
6
Who Is Susceptible to Online Health Misinformation?谁容易受到网络健康错误信息的影响?
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S276-S277. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305908.
7
Content Themes and Influential Voices Within Vaccine Opposition on Twitter, 2019.2019 年推特上的疫苗反对者的主题内容和有影响力的声音。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S326-S330. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305901.
8
Breast Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Misinformation on Pinterest, 2018.2018 年,Pinterest 上有关乳腺癌预防和治疗的错误信息。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S300-S304. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305812.
9
Concrete Recommendations for Cutting Through Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间消除错误信息的具体建议。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S286-S287. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305922.
10
Crowdfunding Cannabidiol (CBD) for Cancer: Hype and Misinformation on GoFundMe.众筹大麻二酚(CBD)治疗癌症:GoFundMe 上的炒作和错误信息。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S294-S299. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305768.