• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同增强材料三维打印假肢接受腔的研究:力学强度与微观结构分析。

Investigation on three-dimensional printed prosthetics leg sockets coated with different reinforcement materials: analysis on mechanical strength and microstructural.

机构信息

Bone Biomechanics Laboratory (BBL), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia.

Bioinspired Devices and Tissue Engineering (BIOINSPIRA) Research Group, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57454-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-57454-8
PMID:38514731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10958049/
Abstract

Previous research has primarily focused on pre-processing parameters such as design, material selection, and printing techniques to improve the strength of 3D-printed prosthetic leg sockets. However, these methods fail to address the major challenges that arise post-printing, namely failures at the distal end of the socket and susceptibility to shear failure. Addressing this gap, the study aims to enhance the mechanical properties of 3D-printed prosthetic leg sockets through post-processing techniques. Fifteen PLA + prosthetic leg sockets are fabricated and reinforced with four materials: carbon fiber, carbon-Kevlar fiber, fiberglass, and cement. Mechanical and microstructural properties of the sockets are evaluated through axial compression testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results highlight superior attributes of cement-reinforced sockets, exhibiting significantly higher yield strength (up to 89.57% more than counterparts) and higher Young's modulus (up to 76.15% greater). SEM reveals correlations between microstructural properties and socket strength. These findings deepen the comprehension of 3D-printed prosthetic leg socket post-processing, presenting optimization prospects. Future research can focus on refining fabrication techniques, exploring alternative reinforcement materials, and investigating the long-term durability and functionality of post-processed 3D-printed prosthetic leg sockets.

摘要

先前的研究主要集中在设计、材料选择和打印技术等预处理参数上,以提高 3D 打印假肢接受腔的强度。然而,这些方法无法解决打印后出现的主要问题,即接受腔末端的失效和抗剪切失效的问题。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在通过后处理技术来提高 3D 打印假肢接受腔的机械性能。制作了 15 个 PLA + 假肢接受腔,并使用四种材料进行增强:碳纤维、碳凯夫拉纤维、玻璃纤维和水泥。通过轴向压缩试验和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估了接受腔的机械和微观结构性能。结果突出了水泥增强接受腔的优越性能,表现出更高的屈服强度(比对照物高出高达 89.57%)和更高的杨氏模量(高达 76.15%)。SEM 揭示了微观结构特性和接受腔强度之间的相关性。这些发现加深了对 3D 打印假肢接受腔后处理的理解,提出了优化的前景。未来的研究可以集中在改进制造技术、探索替代增强材料以及研究后处理的 3D 打印假肢接受腔的长期耐久性和功能上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/db5930c3e612/41598_2024_57454_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1333e78c9f99/41598_2024_57454_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/6429daaeb07e/41598_2024_57454_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/148ee39c82d2/41598_2024_57454_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/5fafbd4dbbf8/41598_2024_57454_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/57f757f3ed20/41598_2024_57454_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ea8c6233b5d3/41598_2024_57454_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/fabed6b2e6ca/41598_2024_57454_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/66506d42b587/41598_2024_57454_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ea611a7d386a/41598_2024_57454_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/564ab0298021/41598_2024_57454_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/622f76278ccf/41598_2024_57454_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/86c627a951f8/41598_2024_57454_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/3bc1b770f0f1/41598_2024_57454_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ed94f9912fa2/41598_2024_57454_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1283d60fe86c/41598_2024_57454_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/dae1d735564a/41598_2024_57454_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/468f71410e82/41598_2024_57454_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/b0775dd0a96b/41598_2024_57454_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/24b3d6035069/41598_2024_57454_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1012c341e0e7/41598_2024_57454_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/db5930c3e612/41598_2024_57454_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1333e78c9f99/41598_2024_57454_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/6429daaeb07e/41598_2024_57454_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/148ee39c82d2/41598_2024_57454_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/5fafbd4dbbf8/41598_2024_57454_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/57f757f3ed20/41598_2024_57454_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ea8c6233b5d3/41598_2024_57454_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/fabed6b2e6ca/41598_2024_57454_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/66506d42b587/41598_2024_57454_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ea611a7d386a/41598_2024_57454_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/564ab0298021/41598_2024_57454_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/622f76278ccf/41598_2024_57454_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/86c627a951f8/41598_2024_57454_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/3bc1b770f0f1/41598_2024_57454_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/ed94f9912fa2/41598_2024_57454_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1283d60fe86c/41598_2024_57454_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/dae1d735564a/41598_2024_57454_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/468f71410e82/41598_2024_57454_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/b0775dd0a96b/41598_2024_57454_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/24b3d6035069/41598_2024_57454_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/1012c341e0e7/41598_2024_57454_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/10958049/db5930c3e612/41598_2024_57454_Fig21_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigation on three-dimensional printed prosthetics leg sockets coated with different reinforcement materials: analysis on mechanical strength and microstructural.不同增强材料三维打印假肢接受腔的研究:力学强度与微观结构分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57454-8.
2
3D printed transtibial prosthetic sockets: A systematic review.3D 打印胫骨假体接受腔:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275161. eCollection 2022.
3
A qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of lower limb 3D printed sockets.一项探索医疗保健专业人员对下肢 3D 打印接受腔的看法的定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):4033-4039. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2258345. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Strength testing of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic socket.低成本 3D 打印小腿假肢接受腔的强度测试。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022 Mar;236(3):367-375. doi: 10.1177/09544119211060092. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
Examining the viability of carbon fiber reinforced three-dimensionally printed prosthetic feet created by composite filament fabrication.研究通过复合长丝制造法生成的碳纤维增强三维打印假脚的可行性。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Dec;42(6):644-651. doi: 10.1177/0309364618785726. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Introducing microarchitecture into 3D-printed prosthesis socket: Pressure distribution and mechanical performance.将微结构引入 3D 打印义肢接受腔:压力分布和机械性能。
Med Eng Phys. 2023 Dec;122:104075. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104075. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
7
A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.一项关于利益相关者对经胫骨截肢数字假肢接受腔制造看法的定性研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Dec 1;46(6):607-613. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000157. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
8
Three-dimensional printing in prosthetics: Method for managing rapid limb volume change.三维打印在假肢中的应用:快速肢体体积变化管理方法。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Oct;44(5):355-358. doi: 10.1177/0309364620934340. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
An Investigation of the Structural Strength of Transtibial Sockets Fabricated Using Conventional Methods and Rapid Prototyping Techniques.使用传统方法和快速成型技术制造的经胫骨假肢接受腔结构强度的研究。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2019 Apr 18;2(1):31008. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.31008. eCollection 2019.
10
Tensile strength and impact resistance properties of materials used in prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets.用于修复性检查接受腔、共聚物接受腔和定制层压接受腔的材料的拉伸强度和抗冲击性能。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):987-1004. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0204.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical performance analysis of a 3D printing-based transtibial prosthetic socket against the gait cycle using the finite element method.基于有限元法的3D打印经胫骨假肢接受腔在步态周期中的力学性能分析
RSC Adv. 2025 Jul 10;15(30):24150-24166. doi: 10.1039/d5ra03155a.
2
Enhancing the Strength of 3D-Printed Polymer Exoprosthetic Socket by Localized Non-Planar Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforcement.通过局部非平面连续碳纤维增强提高3D打印聚合物假肢接受腔的强度
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;17(8):1097. doi: 10.3390/polym17081097.
3
Application of liposomal nanoparticles of berberine in photodynamic therapy of A549 lung cancer spheroids.

本文引用的文献

1
An Investigation of the Structural Strength of Transtibial Sockets Fabricated Using Conventional Methods and Rapid Prototyping Techniques.使用传统方法和快速成型技术制造的经胫骨假肢接受腔结构强度的研究。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2019 Apr 18;2(1):31008. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.31008. eCollection 2019.
2
Orthotics and prosthetics by 3D-printing: Accelerating its fabrication flow.3D 打印矫形器和假肢:加速其制造流程。
Res Vet Sci. 2023 Sep;162:104960. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.104960. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Axial Compression Behaviour of FRP-Confined Concrete-Core-Encased Rebar.
黄连素脂质体纳米粒在A549肺癌球体光动力治疗中的应用。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024 Nov 17;40:101877. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101877. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Innovations in Gritti-Stokes Amputation: A Focused Analysis of Immobile Patient Outcomes.格里蒂-斯托克斯截肢术的创新:对行动不便患者结局的重点分析。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e69998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69998. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
The Gritti-Stokes Amputation: Is It Still a Reliable Technique in the 21st Century? A Narrative Review.格里蒂-斯托克斯截肢术:在 21 世纪它仍是一种可靠的技术吗?一篇叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 30;60(6):911. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060911.
FRP约束混凝土芯柱钢筋轴向压缩性能的试验与数值研究
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;15(4):828. doi: 10.3390/polym15040828.
4
A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.一项关于利益相关者对经胫骨截肢数字假肢接受腔制造看法的定性研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Dec 1;46(6):607-613. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000157. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
5
A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.用户需求研究推动下肢假肢的发展。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Nov 5;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01097-1.
6
3D printed transtibial prosthetic sockets: A systematic review.3D 打印胫骨假体接受腔:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275161. eCollection 2022.
7
3D Printing: Applications in Tissue Engineering, Medical Devices, and Drug Delivery.3D 打印:在组织工程、医疗器械和药物输送中的应用。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022 Mar 17;23(4):92. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02242-8.
8
Strength testing of low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetic socket.低成本 3D 打印小腿假肢接受腔的强度测试。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022 Mar;236(3):367-375. doi: 10.1177/09544119211060092. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Pioneering low-cost 3D-printed transtibial prosthetics to serve a rural population in Sierra Leone - an observational cohort study.开创性的低成本3D打印经胫骨假肢服务于塞拉利昂农村人口——一项观察性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 8;35:100874. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100874. eCollection 2021 May.
10
3D-Printing and Upper-Limb Prosthetic Sockets: Promises and Pitfalls.3D 打印与上肢假肢接受腔:前景与挑战。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:527-535. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3057984. Epub 2021 Mar 3.