• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压中心律传导系统疾病的发生率和预后:STEP 试验。

Incidence and prognosis of cardiac conduction system diseases in hypertension: the STEP trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Hypertension Center, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Nat Aging. 2024 Apr;4(4):483-490. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00591-6. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1038/s43587-024-00591-6
PMID:38514823
Abstract

Patients with cardiac conduction system diseases (CSD) may have increased incidence and mortality of cardiovascular events. Here we report a post hoc analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311) concerning the effect of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on the incidence of new-onset CSD and the prognostic implications of preexisting or new-onset CSD. The incidence of new-onset CSD was similar in the intensive (n = 205, 6.42%) and standard (n = 188, 5.94%) treatment arms. Participants with preexisting CSD had a higher risk for acute decompensated heart failure. Increased age, male sex and increased body mass index were independently associated with increased risk for new-onset CSD. Our results suggest that intensive BP control may not reduce the incidence of new-onset CSD compared with standard BP control.

摘要

患有心脏传导系统疾病(CSD)的患者心血管事件的发生率和死亡率可能会增加。在这里,我们报告了老年高血压患者血压干预策略(STEP)随机临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03015311)的事后分析,该研究涉及强化血压(BP)控制对新发 CSD 发生率的影响,以及新发或原有 CSD 的预后意义。强化治疗组(n=205,6.42%)和标准治疗组(n=188,5.94%)新发 CSD 的发生率相似。患有原有 CSD 的患者发生急性失代偿性心力衰竭的风险更高。年龄较大、男性和体重指数增加与新发 CSD 的风险增加独立相关。我们的研究结果表明,与标准 BP 控制相比,强化 BP 控制可能不会降低新发 CSD 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Incidence and prognosis of cardiac conduction system diseases in hypertension: the STEP trial.高血压中心律传导系统疾病的发生率和预后:STEP 试验。
Nat Aging. 2024 Apr;4(4):483-490. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00591-6. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Incidence and Implications of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter in Hypertension: Insights From the SPRINT Trial.高血压中心房颤动/房扑的发生率及其影响:SPRINT 试验的见解。
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1483-1490. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14690. Epub 2020 May 4.
3
Intensive blood pressure lowering and the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with hypertension: a post-hoc analysis of the STEP randomized trial.强化降压与高血压患者新发糖尿病风险:STEP 随机试验的事后分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;30(10):988-995. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad105.
4
Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化血压控制试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385(14):1268-1279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering: Results From the STEP Randomized Trial.基线舒张压对强化降压效果的影响:来自 STEP 随机试验的结果。
Hypertension. 2023 Dec;80(12):2572-2580. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21892. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
6
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Heart Failure Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Intervention Trial.收缩压降低干预试验中强化血压治疗对心力衰竭事件的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003613.
7
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation.强化降压对房颤风险的影响。
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1491-1496. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14766. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Early Blood Pressure Reduction by Intravenous Vasodilators Is Associated With Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Hypertensive Acute Decompensated Heart.静脉血管扩张剂早期降压与高血压急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的急性肾损伤相关。
Circ J. 2019 Aug 23;83(9):1883-1890. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0333. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatment by the levels of baseline Framingham risk score: A post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).基于基线 Framingham 风险评分水平的降压治疗效果:SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)的事后分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec;21(12):1813-1820. doi: 10.1111/jch.13720. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk-benefit profile of intensive blood pressure control amongst nondiabetic patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.估算肾小球滤过率与非糖尿病患者强化血压控制的风险-获益特征:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;283(3):314-327. doi: 10.1111/joim.12701. Epub 2017 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of baseline eGFR and incident heart failure on patients receiving intensive blood pressure treatment.接受强化血压治疗患者的基线估算肾小球滤过率与新发心力衰竭的关联。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2148-2156. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15232. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
2
Efficacy and safety of leadless ventricular pacemaker: a single-center retrospective observational study.无导线心室起搏器的疗效与安全性:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Oct 31;14(5):878-889. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-181. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Incident Left Ventricular Conduction Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制与新发左束支传导阻滞相关性的研究:SPRINT 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;8(6):612-616. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0845.
2
Lifestyle habits associated with cardiac conduction disease.与心脏传导疾病相关的生活习惯。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Mar 21;44(12):1058-1066. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac799.
3
Fascicular heart blocks and risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes: Results from a large primary care population.
束支传导阻滞与不良心血管结局的风险:来自大型初级保健人群的研究结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Feb;19(2):252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化血压控制试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385(14):1268-1279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
Prevalence and risk factors of atrioventricular block among 15 million Chinese health examination participants in 2018: a nation-wide cross-sectional study.2018 年 1500 万中国体检参与者中心房-心室传导阻滞的患病率及危险因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02105-3.
6
Left Posterior Fascicular Block and Increased Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Young People.年轻人左后分支阻滞与心脏性猝死风险增加
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 2;77(8):1143-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.033.
7
Mortality in Patients With Right Bundle-Branch Block in the Absence of Cardiovascular Disease.无心血管疾病的右束支传导阻滞患者的死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e017430. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017430. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
8
High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease.高血压与心血管疾病。
Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Strategy of blood pressure intervention in the elderly hypertensive patients (STEP): Rational, design, and baseline characteristics for the main trial.老年高血压患者血压干预策略(STEP):主要试验的合理性、设计和基线特征。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105913. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105913. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
Effect of Left Ventricular Conduction Delay on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality (from the PRECISION Trial).左心室传导延迟对全因和心血管死亡率的影响(来自 PRECISION 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;124(7):1049-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.024. Epub 2019 Jul 15.