• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收缩压降低干预试验中强化血压治疗对心力衰竭事件的影响。

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Heart Failure Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Intervention Trial.

作者信息

Upadhya Bharathi, Rocco Michael, Lewis Cora E, Oparil Suzanne, Lovato Laura C, Cushman William C, Bates Jeffrey T, Bello Natalie A, Aurigemma Gerard, Fine Lawrence J, Johnson Karen C, Rodriguez Carlos J, Raj Dominic S, Rastogi Anjay, Tamariz Leonardo, Wiggers Alan, Kitzman Dalane W

机构信息

From the Cardiovascular Medicine Section (B.U., C.J.R., D.W.K.), Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine (M.R.), and Biostatistics (L.C.L.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Division of Preventive Medicine (C.E.L.) and Division of Cardiovascular Disease (S.O.), Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham; Preventive Medicine Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN (W.C.C.); Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (J.T.B.); Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (N.A.B.); Department of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (G.A.); Clinical Applications and Prevention Branch, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (L.J.F.); Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis (K.C.J.); Department of Medicine-Nephrology, George Washington University School of Medicine, DC (D.S.R.); Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (A.R.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL (L.T.); and UH Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Medical Center, OH (A.W.).

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003613.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003613
PMID:28364091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5384646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) was a frequent common outcome in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). We examined whether there was differential reduction in ADHF events from intensive blood pressure [BP] treatment among the 6 key, prespecified subgroups in SPRINT: age ≥75 years, prior cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, women, black race, and 3 levels of baseline systolic BP (≤132 versus >132 to <145 versus ≥145 mm Hg).

METHODS AND RESULTS

ADHF was defined as hospitalization for ADHF, confirmed and formally adjudicated by a blinded events committee using standardized protocols. At 3.29 years follow-up, there were 103 ADHF events (2.2%) among 4683 standard arm participants and 65 ADHF events (1.4%) among 4678 intensive arm participants (Cox proportional hazards ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.85; value =0.003). In multivariable analyses, including treatment arm, baseline covariates that were significant predictors for ADHF included chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, age≥75 years, body mass index, and higher systolic BP. The beneficial effect of the intervention on incident ADHF was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. Participants who had incident ADHF had markedly increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, including a 27-fold increase (<0.001) in cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting a systolic BP<120 mm Hg, compared with <140 mm Hg, significantly reduced ADHF events, and the benefit was similar across all key, prespecified subgroups. Participants who developed ADHF had markedly increased risk for subsequent cardiovascular events and death, highlighting the importance of strategies aimed at prevention of ADHF, especially intensive BP reduction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

背景

急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)是收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中常见的一个频繁出现的结局。我们研究了在SPRINT预先设定的6个关键亚组中,强化血压治疗对ADHF事件的减少是否存在差异,这6个亚组分别为:年龄≥75岁、既往有心血管疾病、慢性肾脏病、女性、黑人种族以及3个基线收缩压水平(≤132mmHg与>132至<145mmHg与≥145mmHg)。

方法与结果

ADHF定义为因ADHF住院,由一个盲法事件委员会使用标准化方案进行确认和正式判定。在3.29年的随访中,4683名标准治疗组参与者中有103例ADHF事件(2.2%),4678名强化治疗组参与者中有65例ADHF事件(1.4%)(Cox比例风险比,0.63;95%置信区间,0.46 - 0.85;P值 = 0.003)。在多变量分析中,包括治疗组,对ADHF有显著预测作用的基线协变量包括慢性肾脏病、心血管疾病、年龄≥75岁、体重指数以及较高的收缩压。干预对新发ADHF的有益作用在所有预先设定的亚组中都是一致的。发生ADHF的参与者随后发生心血管事件的风险显著增加,包括心血管死亡增加27倍(P<0.001)。

结论

将收缩压目标设定为<120mmHg,与<140mmHg相比,显著减少了ADHF事件,并且在所有关键的预先设定亚组中获益相似。发生ADHF的参与者随后发生心血管事件和死亡的风险显著增加,这突出了旨在预防ADHF策略的重要性,尤其是强化降压。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01206062。

相似文献

1
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Heart Failure Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Intervention Trial.收缩压降低干预试验中强化血压治疗对心力衰竭事件的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003613.
2
Heart Failure Primary Prevention: What Does SPRINT Add?: Recent Advances in Hypertension.心力衰竭一级预防:SPRINT 有何新增内容?:高血压的最新进展。
Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):1804-1814. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.16503. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).在美国采用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)强化血压治疗方案避免的潜在死亡和发生的严重不良事件:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的预测
Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):1617-1628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025322. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
Personalizing the Intensity of Blood Pressure Control: Modeling the Heterogeneity of Risks and Benefits From SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).个性化血压控制强度:对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)风险和获益的异质性进行建模
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003624.
5
Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Heart Failure With Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in SPRINT.SPRINT 研究中射血分数保留与降低的急性心力衰竭的发生率和结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;14(12):e008322. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008322. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).强化降压对高血压患者左心室肥厚的影响:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)
Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):440-450. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441. Epub 2017 May 16.
7
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Acute Kidney Injury Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压治疗对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中急性肾损伤事件的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Mar;71(3):352-361. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Heart Failure Prevention in Older Patients Using Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction: Potential Role of Diuretics.老年患者通过强化降压预防心力衰竭:利尿剂的潜在作用。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;7(12):1032-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.018.

引用本文的文献

1
The aging heart: exploring the role of Klotho in cardiac health/function.衰老的心脏:探索Klotho在心脏健康/功能中的作用。
J Cardiovasc Aging. 2024 Dec;4(4). doi: 10.20517/jca.2024.16. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.一种用于预测强化血压治疗益处的风险分层模型:收缩压干预试验分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/jch.70098.
3
Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT.收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中社区居住的老年人强化降压的个体化净获益
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1441-1453. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19395. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2025年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S207-S238. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S010.
5
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Aug 14;10(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00540-y.
6
Incorporating Individual-Level Treatment Effects and Outcome Preferences Into Personalized Blood Pressure Target Recommendations.将个体治疗效果和结局偏好纳入个性化血压目标推荐中。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e033995. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.033995. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Blood pressure and heart failure: focused on treatment.血压与心力衰竭:聚焦于治疗
Clin Hypertens. 2024 Jun 1;30(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00271-y.
8
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2024年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S179-S218. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S010.
9
Preventing new-onset heart failure: Intervening at stage A.预防新发心力衰竭:在A阶段进行干预。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Oct 2;16:100609. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100609. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
The AHA/ACC/HFSA 2022 Heart Failure Guidelines: Changing the Focus to Heart Failure Prevention.美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会2022年心力衰竭指南:将重点转向心力衰竭预防。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jul 30;15:100527. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100527. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Diastolic Blood Pressure, Subclinical Myocardial Damage, and Cardiac Events: Implications for Blood Pressure Control.舒张压、亚临床心肌损伤与心脏事件:对血压控制的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 18;68(16):1713-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.754. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
2
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
3
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment. 6. Prevention of heart failure and new-onset heart failure--meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗的效果。6. 心力衰竭的预防及新发心力衰竭——随机试验的荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2016 Mar;34(3):373-84; discussion 384. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000848.
4
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
5
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2015年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).一项比较两种收缩压控制策略的多中心临床试验的设计与原理:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):532-46. doi: 10.1177/1740774514537404. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
8
Outcomes of combined cardiovascular risk factor management strategies in type 2 diabetes: the ACCORD randomized trial.2型糖尿病合并心血管危险因素管理策略的结局:ACCORD随机试验
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1721-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2334. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
9
Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2014年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):399-410. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12.
10
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2014年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18.