• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施无行为健康共付额法律后处方药配药和患者费用。

Prescription Drug Dispensing and Patient Costs After Implementation of a No Behavioral Health Cost-Sharing Law.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240198. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0198.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0198
PMID:38517423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10960196/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

On January 1, 2022, New Mexico implemented a No Behavioral Cost-Sharing (NCS) law that eliminated cost-sharing for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatments in plans regulated by the state, potentially reducing a barrier to treatment for MH/SUDs among the commercially insured; however, the outcomes of the law are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of implementation of the NCS with out-of-pocket spending for prescription for drugs primarily used to treat MH/SUDs and monthly volume of dispensed drugs.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used a difference-in-differences research design to examine trends in outcomes for New Mexico state employees, a population affected by the NCS, compared with federal employees in New Mexico who were unaffected by NCS. Data were collected on prescription drugs for MH/SUDs dispensed per month between January 2021 and June 2022 for New Mexico patients with a New Mexico state employee health plan and New Mexico patients with a federal employee health plan. Data analysis occurred from December 2022 to January 2024.

EXPOSURE

Enrollment in a state employee health plan or federal health plan.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were mean patient out-of-pocket spending per dispensed MH/SUD prescription and the monthly volume of dispensed MH/SUD prescriptions per 1000 employees. A difference-in-differences estimation approach was used.

RESULTS

The implementation of the NCS law was associated with a mean (SE) $6.37 ($0.30) reduction (corresponding to an 85.6% decrease) in mean out-of-pocket spending per dispensed MH/SUD medication (95% CI, -$7.00 to -$5.75). The association of implementation of NCS with the volume of prescriptions dispensed was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that the implementation of the New Mexico NCS law was successful in lowering out-of-pocket spending on prescription medications for MH/SUDs, but that there was no association of NCS with the volume of medications dispensed in the first 6 months after implementation. A key challenge is to identify policies that protect from high out-of-pocket spending while also promoting access to needed care.

摘要

重要性

2022 年 1 月 1 日,新墨西哥州实施了一项无行为成本分担(NCS)法,取消了该州监管的医疗保险计划中精神健康和物质使用障碍(MH/SUD)治疗的费用分担,这可能会降低商业保险人群中 MH/SUD 治疗的障碍;然而,该法律的结果尚不清楚。

目的

评估实施 NCS 与主要用于治疗 MH/SUD 的药物的自付费用支出和每月药物配药量之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:本回顾性队列研究采用差异中的差异研究设计,比较受 NCS 影响的新墨西哥州员工的人群的结果与不受 NCS 影响的新墨西哥州联邦员工的结果。数据收集于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间新墨西哥州员工健康计划和新墨西哥州联邦员工健康计划的新墨西哥州患者每月 MH/SUD 药物处方的药物。数据分析于 2022 年 12 月至 2024 年 1 月进行。

暴露

参加州员工健康计划或联邦健康计划。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是每位患者开出的 MH/SUD 处方的平均患者自付费用和每 1000 名员工开出的 MH/SUD 处方的每月数量。采用差异中的差异估计方法。

结果

NCS 法的实施与每位患者开出的 MH/SUD 药物的平均(SE)自付费用减少 6.37 美元(0.30 美元)(对应于 85.6%的减少)(95%CI,-7.00 美元至-5.75 美元)相关。实施 NCS 与配药数量之间的关联没有统计学意义。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,新墨西哥州 NCS 法的实施成功降低了 MH/SUD 处方药的自付费用,但在实施后 6 个月内,NCS 与配药量之间没有关联。一个关键挑战是确定既能保护免受高额自付费用又能促进获得所需护理的政策。

相似文献

1
Prescription Drug Dispensing and Patient Costs After Implementation of a No Behavioral Health Cost-Sharing Law.实施无行为健康共付额法律后处方药配药和患者费用。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240198. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0198.
2
Comparison of Anticancer Medication Use and Spending Under US Oncology Parity Laws With and Without Out-of-Pocket Spending Caps.美国肿瘤学均等法案下有和无自付费用上限对癌症药物使用和支出的比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 28;2(5):e210673. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0673. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Parity and out-of-pocket spending for children with high mental health or substance abuse expenditures.精神健康或物质滥用支出较高的儿童的平价医疗和自付费用。
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e903-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1491. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
4
Out-of-Pocket and Health Care Spending Changes for Patients Using Orally Administered Anticancer Therapy After Adoption of State Parity Laws.州平价法实施后口服抗癌治疗患者自付费用和医疗支出变化。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;4(6):e173598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3598.
5
Drug use and spending under a formulary informed by cost-effectiveness.基于成本效益的用药清单下的药物使用和支出。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Nov;29(11):1175-1183. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.11.1175.
6
Oregon's Hospital Payment Cap and Enrollee Out-of-Pocket Spending and Service Use.俄勒冈州的医院支付上限和参保者自付支出及服务使用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):e242614. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2614.
7
A comparison of costs of Medicare Part D prescriptions dispensed at retail and mail order pharmacies.比较在零售和邮购药店配药的医疗保险处方药 D 部分的成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):959-67. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.959.
8
Trends in Out-of-Pocket Costs for and Characteristics of Pharmacy-Dispensed Buprenorphine Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment by Type of Payer, 2015 to 2020.2015 年至 2020 年按支付类型划分的用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药房配给丁丙诺啡药物的自付费用和特征趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54590.
9
Association of High-Deductible Health Plan Enrollment With Spending on and Use of Lenalidomide Therapy Among Commercially Insured Patients With Multiple Myeloma.高免赔额健康计划参保与商业保险多发性骨髓瘤患者来那度胺治疗的花费和使用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215720. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15720.
10
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.医生和患者对药品参考定价的调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.

本文引用的文献

1
How policymakers innovate around behavioral health: adoption of the New Mexico "No Behavioral Health Cost-Sharing" law.政策制定者如何围绕行为健康进行创新:新墨西哥州“无行为健康费用分担”法的采用。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Dec 6;2(1):qxad081. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad081. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Insulin Fills by Medicare Enrollees and Out-of-Pocket Caps Under the Inflation Reduction Act.医疗保险参保者的胰岛素费用报销情况以及《降低通胀法案》规定的自付费用上限。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):660-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12951.
3
Mental Health Service Utilization Rates Among Commercially Insured Adults in the US During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠大流行第一年美国商业保险成年人心理健康服务利用率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jan 6;4(1):e224936. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4936.
4
Effects of High-Deductible Health Plans on Enrollees With Mental Health Conditions With and Without Substance Use Disorders.高自付额健康计划对有和没有物质使用障碍的心理健康状况参保者的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 May;73(5):518-525. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000914. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Utilization of Mental Health Care.平价医疗法案医疗补助扩大对精神保健利用的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Sep;58(9):757-762. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001373.
6
A comprehensive analysis of mortality-related health metrics associated with mental disorders: a nationwide, register-based cohort study.一项与精神障碍相关的死亡率健康指标的综合分析:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 16;394(10211):1827-1835. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32316-5. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
7
The Effects of Federal Parity on Mental Health Services Use and Spending: Evidence From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.联邦平价法案对精神健康服务使用和支出的影响:来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Apr 1;70(4):287-293. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800313. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Medicaid Expansion and Prescription Trends: Opioids, Addiction Therapies, and Other Drugs.医疗补助扩张与处方趋势:阿片类药物、成瘾治疗药物和其他药物。
Med Care. 2019 Mar;57(3):208-212. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001054.
9
Impact of severe mental illness on cancer stage at diagnosis and subsequent mortality: A population-based register study.严重精神疾病对诊断时癌症分期和随后死亡率的影响:基于人群的登记研究。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
10
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.